Cargando…

Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND: Robotic gastrectomy (RG) is a new surgical method alternative for gastric cancer. However, few studies have evaluated the outcomes of RG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the short-and long-term outcomes of RG and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhengyan, Li, Jipeng, Li, Bofei, Bai, Bin, Liu, Yezhou, Lian, Bo, Zhao, Qingchuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5901130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29692629
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S161007
_version_ 1783314546653396992
author Li, Zhengyan
Li, Jipeng
Li, Bofei
Bai, Bin
Liu, Yezhou
Lian, Bo
Zhao, Qingchuan
author_facet Li, Zhengyan
Li, Jipeng
Li, Bofei
Bai, Bin
Liu, Yezhou
Lian, Bo
Zhao, Qingchuan
author_sort Li, Zhengyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robotic gastrectomy (RG) is a new surgical method alternative for gastric cancer. However, few studies have evaluated the outcomes of RG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the short-and long-term outcomes of RG and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) with D2 lymph node dissection for AGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 454 patients with AGC who underwent RG or LG with D2 lymph node dissection for AGC between August 2013 and March 2017. The short-and long-term outcomes were compared between the propensity score-matched groups. RESULTS: The RG group was associated with longer operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and higher hospital cost. Additionally, there was a tendency favoring RG in terms of number of harvested lymph nodes, time to first flatus, time to first start diet, and postoperative hospital stay, although the differences were not statistically significant. The overall postoperative complication rate was 13.4% and 11.6% in the RG and LG groups, respectively, with no significant difference (P=0.686). The 3-year overall survival and recurrence rates of the RG and LG groups were also comparable (78.6% vs 74.1%, P=0.483; 18.8% vs 21.4%, P=0.617; respectively). CONCLUSION: RG with D2 lymph node dissection is safe and feasible for AGC in terms of both short- and long-term outcomes. High-volume randomized controlled trials with sufficient follow-up are needed to confirm this rationale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5901130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59011302018-04-24 Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis Li, Zhengyan Li, Jipeng Li, Bofei Bai, Bin Liu, Yezhou Lian, Bo Zhao, Qingchuan Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Robotic gastrectomy (RG) is a new surgical method alternative for gastric cancer. However, few studies have evaluated the outcomes of RG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the short-and long-term outcomes of RG and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) with D2 lymph node dissection for AGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 454 patients with AGC who underwent RG or LG with D2 lymph node dissection for AGC between August 2013 and March 2017. The short-and long-term outcomes were compared between the propensity score-matched groups. RESULTS: The RG group was associated with longer operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and higher hospital cost. Additionally, there was a tendency favoring RG in terms of number of harvested lymph nodes, time to first flatus, time to first start diet, and postoperative hospital stay, although the differences were not statistically significant. The overall postoperative complication rate was 13.4% and 11.6% in the RG and LG groups, respectively, with no significant difference (P=0.686). The 3-year overall survival and recurrence rates of the RG and LG groups were also comparable (78.6% vs 74.1%, P=0.483; 18.8% vs 21.4%, P=0.617; respectively). CONCLUSION: RG with D2 lymph node dissection is safe and feasible for AGC in terms of both short- and long-term outcomes. High-volume randomized controlled trials with sufficient follow-up are needed to confirm this rationale. Dove Medical Press 2018-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5901130/ /pubmed/29692629 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S161007 Text en © 2018 Li et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, Zhengyan
Li, Jipeng
Li, Bofei
Bai, Bin
Liu, Yezhou
Lian, Bo
Zhao, Qingchuan
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_fullStr Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_short Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_sort robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with d2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5901130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29692629
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S161007
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhengyan roboticversuslaparoscopicgastrectomywithd2lymphnodedissectionforadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT lijipeng roboticversuslaparoscopicgastrectomywithd2lymphnodedissectionforadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT libofei roboticversuslaparoscopicgastrectomywithd2lymphnodedissectionforadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT baibin roboticversuslaparoscopicgastrectomywithd2lymphnodedissectionforadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT liuyezhou roboticversuslaparoscopicgastrectomywithd2lymphnodedissectionforadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT lianbo roboticversuslaparoscopicgastrectomywithd2lymphnodedissectionforadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT zhaoqingchuan roboticversuslaparoscopicgastrectomywithd2lymphnodedissectionforadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis