Cargando…

Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice

Understanding the determinants of syntactic choice in sentence production is a salient topic in psycholinguistics. Existing evidence suggests that syntactic choice results from an interplay between linguistic and non-linguistic factors, and a speaker’s attention to the elements of a described event...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pokhoday, Mikhail, Scheepers, Christoph, Shtyrov, Yury, Myachykov, Andriy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195547
_version_ 1783314693834670080
author Pokhoday, Mikhail
Scheepers, Christoph
Shtyrov, Yury
Myachykov, Andriy
author_facet Pokhoday, Mikhail
Scheepers, Christoph
Shtyrov, Yury
Myachykov, Andriy
author_sort Pokhoday, Mikhail
collection PubMed
description Understanding the determinants of syntactic choice in sentence production is a salient topic in psycholinguistics. Existing evidence suggests that syntactic choice results from an interplay between linguistic and non-linguistic factors, and a speaker’s attention to the elements of a described event represents one such factor. Whereas multimodal accounts of attention suggest a role for different modalities in this process, existing studies examining attention effects in syntactic choice are primarily based on visual cueing paradigms. Hence, it remains unclear whether attentional effects on syntactic choice are limited to the visual modality or are indeed more general. This issue is addressed by the current study. Native English participants viewed and described line drawings of simple transitive events while their attention was directed to the location of the agent or the patient of the depicted event by means of either an auditory (monaural beep) or a motor (unilateral key press) lateral cue. Our results show an effect of cue location, with participants producing more passive-voice descriptions in the patient-cued conditions. Crucially, this cue location effect emerged in the motor-cue but not (or substantially less so) in the auditory-cue condition, as confirmed by a reliable interaction between cue location (agent vs. patient) and cue type (auditory vs. motor). Our data suggest that attentional effects on the speaker’s syntactic choices are modality-specific and limited to the visual and motor, but not the auditory, domain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5902030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59020302018-05-06 Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice Pokhoday, Mikhail Scheepers, Christoph Shtyrov, Yury Myachykov, Andriy PLoS One Research Article Understanding the determinants of syntactic choice in sentence production is a salient topic in psycholinguistics. Existing evidence suggests that syntactic choice results from an interplay between linguistic and non-linguistic factors, and a speaker’s attention to the elements of a described event represents one such factor. Whereas multimodal accounts of attention suggest a role for different modalities in this process, existing studies examining attention effects in syntactic choice are primarily based on visual cueing paradigms. Hence, it remains unclear whether attentional effects on syntactic choice are limited to the visual modality or are indeed more general. This issue is addressed by the current study. Native English participants viewed and described line drawings of simple transitive events while their attention was directed to the location of the agent or the patient of the depicted event by means of either an auditory (monaural beep) or a motor (unilateral key press) lateral cue. Our results show an effect of cue location, with participants producing more passive-voice descriptions in the patient-cued conditions. Crucially, this cue location effect emerged in the motor-cue but not (or substantially less so) in the auditory-cue condition, as confirmed by a reliable interaction between cue location (agent vs. patient) and cue type (auditory vs. motor). Our data suggest that attentional effects on the speaker’s syntactic choices are modality-specific and limited to the visual and motor, but not the auditory, domain. Public Library of Science 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5902030/ /pubmed/29659592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195547 Text en © 2018 Pokhoday et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pokhoday, Mikhail
Scheepers, Christoph
Shtyrov, Yury
Myachykov, Andriy
Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice
title Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice
title_full Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice
title_fullStr Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice
title_full_unstemmed Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice
title_short Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice
title_sort motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195547
work_keys_str_mv AT pokhodaymikhail motorbutnotauditoryattentionaffectssyntacticchoice
AT scheeperschristoph motorbutnotauditoryattentionaffectssyntacticchoice
AT shtyrovyury motorbutnotauditoryattentionaffectssyntacticchoice
AT myachykovandriy motorbutnotauditoryattentionaffectssyntacticchoice