Cargando…

Acupotomy for calcaneodynia: A systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: Calcaneodynia customarily induces inferior heel pain, specialists believe that the pain is principally caused by acute or chronic injury due to the plantar fascia from accumulative overload pressure. Acupotomy has been widely used to treat calcaneodynia. But its efficiency has not been s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Yifeng, Zhou, Qiaoyin, Qiu, Zuyun, Jia, Yan, Li, Shiliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29620626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010143
_version_ 1783314739642761216
author Shen, Yifeng
Zhou, Qiaoyin
Qiu, Zuyun
Jia, Yan
Li, Shiliang
author_facet Shen, Yifeng
Zhou, Qiaoyin
Qiu, Zuyun
Jia, Yan
Li, Shiliang
author_sort Shen, Yifeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Calcaneodynia customarily induces inferior heel pain, specialists believe that the pain is principally caused by acute or chronic injury due to the plantar fascia from accumulative overload pressure. Acupotomy has been widely used to treat calcaneodynia. But its efficiency has not been scientifically and methodically evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the acupotomy treatment in patients with calcaneodynia. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials in 6 databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, Chinese literature databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database [CBM], China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], and Wanfang Database). The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the acupotomy for calcaneodynia patients will be searched in the databases from inception to December 2017 by 2 researchers. Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed as the primary outcomes. Roles and Maudsley Score (RM) will be assessed as the secondary outcome. The RevMan V.5.3 will be used for meta-analysis. Continuous outcomes will be presented as the mean difference or standard mean difference, while dichotomous data will be expressed as relative risk. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of VAS and RM to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy for calcaneodynia patients. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether acupotomy is an effective intervention for patients with Calcaneodynia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5902302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59023022018-04-24 Acupotomy for calcaneodynia: A systematic review protocol Shen, Yifeng Zhou, Qiaoyin Qiu, Zuyun Jia, Yan Li, Shiliang Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: Calcaneodynia customarily induces inferior heel pain, specialists believe that the pain is principally caused by acute or chronic injury due to the plantar fascia from accumulative overload pressure. Acupotomy has been widely used to treat calcaneodynia. But its efficiency has not been scientifically and methodically evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the acupotomy treatment in patients with calcaneodynia. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials in 6 databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, Chinese literature databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database [CBM], China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], and Wanfang Database). The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the acupotomy for calcaneodynia patients will be searched in the databases from inception to December 2017 by 2 researchers. Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed as the primary outcomes. Roles and Maudsley Score (RM) will be assessed as the secondary outcome. The RevMan V.5.3 will be used for meta-analysis. Continuous outcomes will be presented as the mean difference or standard mean difference, while dichotomous data will be expressed as relative risk. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of VAS and RM to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy for calcaneodynia patients. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether acupotomy is an effective intervention for patients with Calcaneodynia. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5902302/ /pubmed/29620626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010143 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3800
Shen, Yifeng
Zhou, Qiaoyin
Qiu, Zuyun
Jia, Yan
Li, Shiliang
Acupotomy for calcaneodynia: A systematic review protocol
title Acupotomy for calcaneodynia: A systematic review protocol
title_full Acupotomy for calcaneodynia: A systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Acupotomy for calcaneodynia: A systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Acupotomy for calcaneodynia: A systematic review protocol
title_short Acupotomy for calcaneodynia: A systematic review protocol
title_sort acupotomy for calcaneodynia: a systematic review protocol
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29620626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010143
work_keys_str_mv AT shenyifeng acupotomyforcalcaneodyniaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT zhouqiaoyin acupotomyforcalcaneodyniaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT qiuzuyun acupotomyforcalcaneodyniaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT jiayan acupotomyforcalcaneodyniaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT lishiliang acupotomyforcalcaneodyniaasystematicreviewprotocol