Cargando…

State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study

We used the 7.5% carbon dioxide model of anxiety induction to investigate the effects of state anxiety on simple information processing. In both high- and low-anxious states, participants (n = 36) completed an auditory–visual matching task and a visual binary categorization task. The stimuli were ei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Easey, Kayleigh E., Catling, Jon C., Kent, Christopher, Crouch, Coral, Jackson, Sam, Munafò, Marcus R., Attwood, Angela S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1413-6
_version_ 1783314768102162432
author Easey, Kayleigh E.
Catling, Jon C.
Kent, Christopher
Crouch, Coral
Jackson, Sam
Munafò, Marcus R.
Attwood, Angela S.
author_facet Easey, Kayleigh E.
Catling, Jon C.
Kent, Christopher
Crouch, Coral
Jackson, Sam
Munafò, Marcus R.
Attwood, Angela S.
author_sort Easey, Kayleigh E.
collection PubMed
description We used the 7.5% carbon dioxide model of anxiety induction to investigate the effects of state anxiety on simple information processing. In both high- and low-anxious states, participants (n = 36) completed an auditory–visual matching task and a visual binary categorization task. The stimuli were either degraded or clear, so as to investigate whether the effects of anxiety are greater when signal clarity is compromised. Accuracy in the matching task was lower during CO(2) inhalation and for degraded stimuli. In the categorization task, response times and indecision (measured using mouse trajectories) were greater during CO(2) inhalation and for degraded stimuli. For most measures, we found no evidence of Gas × Clarity interactions. These data indicate that state anxiety negatively impacts simple information processing and do not support claims that anxiety may benefit performance in low-cognitively-demanding tasks. These findings have important implications for understanding the impact of state anxiety in real-world situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5902516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59025162018-04-24 State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study Easey, Kayleigh E. Catling, Jon C. Kent, Christopher Crouch, Coral Jackson, Sam Munafò, Marcus R. Attwood, Angela S. Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report We used the 7.5% carbon dioxide model of anxiety induction to investigate the effects of state anxiety on simple information processing. In both high- and low-anxious states, participants (n = 36) completed an auditory–visual matching task and a visual binary categorization task. The stimuli were either degraded or clear, so as to investigate whether the effects of anxiety are greater when signal clarity is compromised. Accuracy in the matching task was lower during CO(2) inhalation and for degraded stimuli. In the categorization task, response times and indecision (measured using mouse trajectories) were greater during CO(2) inhalation and for degraded stimuli. For most measures, we found no evidence of Gas × Clarity interactions. These data indicate that state anxiety negatively impacts simple information processing and do not support claims that anxiety may benefit performance in low-cognitively-demanding tasks. These findings have important implications for understanding the impact of state anxiety in real-world situations. Springer US 2018-02-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5902516/ /pubmed/29392633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1413-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Easey, Kayleigh E.
Catling, Jon C.
Kent, Christopher
Crouch, Coral
Jackson, Sam
Munafò, Marcus R.
Attwood, Angela S.
State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study
title State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study
title_full State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study
title_fullStr State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study
title_full_unstemmed State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study
title_short State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study
title_sort state anxiety and information processing: a 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392633
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1413-6
work_keys_str_mv AT easeykayleighe stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy
AT catlingjonc stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy
AT kentchristopher stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy
AT crouchcoral stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy
AT jacksonsam stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy
AT munafomarcusr stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy
AT attwoodangelas stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy