Cargando…
State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study
We used the 7.5% carbon dioxide model of anxiety induction to investigate the effects of state anxiety on simple information processing. In both high- and low-anxious states, participants (n = 36) completed an auditory–visual matching task and a visual binary categorization task. The stimuli were ei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1413-6 |
_version_ | 1783314768102162432 |
---|---|
author | Easey, Kayleigh E. Catling, Jon C. Kent, Christopher Crouch, Coral Jackson, Sam Munafò, Marcus R. Attwood, Angela S. |
author_facet | Easey, Kayleigh E. Catling, Jon C. Kent, Christopher Crouch, Coral Jackson, Sam Munafò, Marcus R. Attwood, Angela S. |
author_sort | Easey, Kayleigh E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We used the 7.5% carbon dioxide model of anxiety induction to investigate the effects of state anxiety on simple information processing. In both high- and low-anxious states, participants (n = 36) completed an auditory–visual matching task and a visual binary categorization task. The stimuli were either degraded or clear, so as to investigate whether the effects of anxiety are greater when signal clarity is compromised. Accuracy in the matching task was lower during CO(2) inhalation and for degraded stimuli. In the categorization task, response times and indecision (measured using mouse trajectories) were greater during CO(2) inhalation and for degraded stimuli. For most measures, we found no evidence of Gas × Clarity interactions. These data indicate that state anxiety negatively impacts simple information processing and do not support claims that anxiety may benefit performance in low-cognitively-demanding tasks. These findings have important implications for understanding the impact of state anxiety in real-world situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5902516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59025162018-04-24 State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study Easey, Kayleigh E. Catling, Jon C. Kent, Christopher Crouch, Coral Jackson, Sam Munafò, Marcus R. Attwood, Angela S. Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report We used the 7.5% carbon dioxide model of anxiety induction to investigate the effects of state anxiety on simple information processing. In both high- and low-anxious states, participants (n = 36) completed an auditory–visual matching task and a visual binary categorization task. The stimuli were either degraded or clear, so as to investigate whether the effects of anxiety are greater when signal clarity is compromised. Accuracy in the matching task was lower during CO(2) inhalation and for degraded stimuli. In the categorization task, response times and indecision (measured using mouse trajectories) were greater during CO(2) inhalation and for degraded stimuli. For most measures, we found no evidence of Gas × Clarity interactions. These data indicate that state anxiety negatively impacts simple information processing and do not support claims that anxiety may benefit performance in low-cognitively-demanding tasks. These findings have important implications for understanding the impact of state anxiety in real-world situations. Springer US 2018-02-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5902516/ /pubmed/29392633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1413-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Easey, Kayleigh E. Catling, Jon C. Kent, Christopher Crouch, Coral Jackson, Sam Munafò, Marcus R. Attwood, Angela S. State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study |
title | State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study |
title_full | State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study |
title_fullStr | State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study |
title_full_unstemmed | State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study |
title_short | State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study |
title_sort | state anxiety and information processing: a 7.5% carbon dioxide challenge study |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1413-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT easeykayleighe stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy AT catlingjonc stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy AT kentchristopher stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy AT crouchcoral stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy AT jacksonsam stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy AT munafomarcusr stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy AT attwoodangelas stateanxietyandinformationprocessinga75carbondioxidechallengestudy |