Cargando…

Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND: Although the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is widely used in the UK, no British English version is available. The aim of this study was to linguistically validate the DASH into British English and then test the reliability and validity of the British Eng...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammond, Alison, Prior, Yeliz, Tyson, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29661183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2032-8
_version_ 1783314823205879808
author Hammond, Alison
Prior, Yeliz
Tyson, Sarah
author_facet Hammond, Alison
Prior, Yeliz
Tyson, Sarah
author_sort Hammond, Alison
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is widely used in the UK, no British English version is available. The aim of this study was to linguistically validate the DASH into British English and then test the reliability and validity of the British English DASH, (including the Work and Sport/Music DASH) and QuickDASH, in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The DASH was forward translated, reviewed by an expert panel and cognitive debriefing interviews undertaken with 31 people with RA. Content validity was evaluated using the ICF Core Set for RA. Participants with RA (n = 340) then completed the DASH, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Short Form Health Survey v2 (SF36v2) and Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand (MAPHAND). We examined internal consistency and concurrent validity for the DASH, Work and Sport/Music DASH modules and QuickDASH. Participants repeated the DASH to assess test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Minor wording changes were made as required. The DASH addresses a quarter of Body Function and half of Activities and Participation codes in the ICF RA Core Set. Internal consistency for DASH scales were consistent with individual use (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94–0.98). Concurrent validity was strong with the HAQ (r(s) = 0.69–0.91), SF36v2 Physical Function (r(s) = − 0.71 - − 0.85), Bodily Pain (r(s) = − 0.71 - − 0.74) scales and MAPHAND (r(s) = 0.71–0.93). Test-retest reliability was good (r(s) = 0.74–0.95). CONCLUSIONS: British English versions of the DASH, QuickDASH and Work and Sport/Music modules are now available to evaluate upper limb disabilities in the UK. The DASH, QuickDASH, Work and Sport/Music modules are reliable and valid to use in clinical practice and research with British people with RA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2032-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5902839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59028392018-04-23 Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis Hammond, Alison Prior, Yeliz Tyson, Sarah BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Although the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is widely used in the UK, no British English version is available. The aim of this study was to linguistically validate the DASH into British English and then test the reliability and validity of the British English DASH, (including the Work and Sport/Music DASH) and QuickDASH, in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The DASH was forward translated, reviewed by an expert panel and cognitive debriefing interviews undertaken with 31 people with RA. Content validity was evaluated using the ICF Core Set for RA. Participants with RA (n = 340) then completed the DASH, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Short Form Health Survey v2 (SF36v2) and Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand (MAPHAND). We examined internal consistency and concurrent validity for the DASH, Work and Sport/Music DASH modules and QuickDASH. Participants repeated the DASH to assess test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Minor wording changes were made as required. The DASH addresses a quarter of Body Function and half of Activities and Participation codes in the ICF RA Core Set. Internal consistency for DASH scales were consistent with individual use (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94–0.98). Concurrent validity was strong with the HAQ (r(s) = 0.69–0.91), SF36v2 Physical Function (r(s) = − 0.71 - − 0.85), Bodily Pain (r(s) = − 0.71 - − 0.74) scales and MAPHAND (r(s) = 0.71–0.93). Test-retest reliability was good (r(s) = 0.74–0.95). CONCLUSIONS: British English versions of the DASH, QuickDASH and Work and Sport/Music modules are now available to evaluate upper limb disabilities in the UK. The DASH, QuickDASH, Work and Sport/Music modules are reliable and valid to use in clinical practice and research with British people with RA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2032-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5902839/ /pubmed/29661183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2032-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hammond, Alison
Prior, Yeliz
Tyson, Sarah
Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the british english versions of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (dash) questionnaire and quickdash in people with rheumatoid arthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29661183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2032-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hammondalison linguisticvalidationvalidityandreliabilityofthebritishenglishversionsofthedisabilitiesofthearmshoulderandhanddashquestionnaireandquickdashinpeoplewithrheumatoidarthritis
AT prioryeliz linguisticvalidationvalidityandreliabilityofthebritishenglishversionsofthedisabilitiesofthearmshoulderandhanddashquestionnaireandquickdashinpeoplewithrheumatoidarthritis
AT tysonsarah linguisticvalidationvalidityandreliabilityofthebritishenglishversionsofthedisabilitiesofthearmshoulderandhanddashquestionnaireandquickdashinpeoplewithrheumatoidarthritis