Cargando…

Use of a life-size three-dimensional-printed spine model for pedicle screw instrumentation training

BACKGROUND: Training beginners of the pedicle screw instrumentation technique in the operating room is limited because of issues related to patient safety and surgical efficiency. Three-dimensional (3D) printing enables training or simulation surgery on a real-size replica of deformed spine, which i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Hyun Jin, Wang, Chenyu, Choi, Kyung Ho, Kim, Hyong Nyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29661210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0788-z
_version_ 1783314828069175296
author Park, Hyun Jin
Wang, Chenyu
Choi, Kyung Ho
Kim, Hyong Nyun
author_facet Park, Hyun Jin
Wang, Chenyu
Choi, Kyung Ho
Kim, Hyong Nyun
author_sort Park, Hyun Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Training beginners of the pedicle screw instrumentation technique in the operating room is limited because of issues related to patient safety and surgical efficiency. Three-dimensional (3D) printing enables training or simulation surgery on a real-size replica of deformed spine, which is difficult to perform in the usual cadaver or surrogate plastic models. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the educational effect of using a real-size 3D-printed spine model for training beginners of the free-hand pedicle screw instrumentation technique. We asked whether the use of a 3D spine model can improve (1) screw instrumentation accuracy and (2) length of procedure. METHODS: Twenty life-size 3D-printed lumbar spine models were made from 10 volunteers (two models for each volunteer). Two novice surgeons who had no experience of free-hand pedicle screw instrumentation technique were instructed by an experienced surgeon, and each surgeon inserted 10 pedicle screws for each lumbar spine model. Computed tomography scans of the spine models were obtained to evaluate screw instrumentation accuracy. The length of time in completing the procedure was recorded. The results of the latter 10 spine models were compared with those of the former 10 models to evaluate learning effect. RESULTS: A total of 37/200 screws (18.5%) perforated the pedicle cortex with a mean of 1.7 mm (range, 1.2–3.3 mm). However, the latter half of the models had significantly less violation than the former half (10/100 vs. 27/100, p < 0.001). The mean length of time to complete 10 pedicle screw instrumentations in a spine model was 42.8 ± 5.3 min for the former 10 spine models and 35.6 ± 2.9 min for the latter 10 spine models. The latter 10 spine models had significantly less time than the former 10 models (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A life-size 3D-printed spine model can be an excellent tool for training beginners of the free-hand pedicle screw instrumentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5902859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59028592018-04-23 Use of a life-size three-dimensional-printed spine model for pedicle screw instrumentation training Park, Hyun Jin Wang, Chenyu Choi, Kyung Ho Kim, Hyong Nyun J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Training beginners of the pedicle screw instrumentation technique in the operating room is limited because of issues related to patient safety and surgical efficiency. Three-dimensional (3D) printing enables training or simulation surgery on a real-size replica of deformed spine, which is difficult to perform in the usual cadaver or surrogate plastic models. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the educational effect of using a real-size 3D-printed spine model for training beginners of the free-hand pedicle screw instrumentation technique. We asked whether the use of a 3D spine model can improve (1) screw instrumentation accuracy and (2) length of procedure. METHODS: Twenty life-size 3D-printed lumbar spine models were made from 10 volunteers (two models for each volunteer). Two novice surgeons who had no experience of free-hand pedicle screw instrumentation technique were instructed by an experienced surgeon, and each surgeon inserted 10 pedicle screws for each lumbar spine model. Computed tomography scans of the spine models were obtained to evaluate screw instrumentation accuracy. The length of time in completing the procedure was recorded. The results of the latter 10 spine models were compared with those of the former 10 models to evaluate learning effect. RESULTS: A total of 37/200 screws (18.5%) perforated the pedicle cortex with a mean of 1.7 mm (range, 1.2–3.3 mm). However, the latter half of the models had significantly less violation than the former half (10/100 vs. 27/100, p < 0.001). The mean length of time to complete 10 pedicle screw instrumentations in a spine model was 42.8 ± 5.3 min for the former 10 spine models and 35.6 ± 2.9 min for the latter 10 spine models. The latter 10 spine models had significantly less time than the former 10 models (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A life-size 3D-printed spine model can be an excellent tool for training beginners of the free-hand pedicle screw instrumentation. BioMed Central 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5902859/ /pubmed/29661210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0788-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Hyun Jin
Wang, Chenyu
Choi, Kyung Ho
Kim, Hyong Nyun
Use of a life-size three-dimensional-printed spine model for pedicle screw instrumentation training
title Use of a life-size three-dimensional-printed spine model for pedicle screw instrumentation training
title_full Use of a life-size three-dimensional-printed spine model for pedicle screw instrumentation training
title_fullStr Use of a life-size three-dimensional-printed spine model for pedicle screw instrumentation training
title_full_unstemmed Use of a life-size three-dimensional-printed spine model for pedicle screw instrumentation training
title_short Use of a life-size three-dimensional-printed spine model for pedicle screw instrumentation training
title_sort use of a life-size three-dimensional-printed spine model for pedicle screw instrumentation training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29661210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0788-z
work_keys_str_mv AT parkhyunjin useofalifesizethreedimensionalprintedspinemodelforpediclescrewinstrumentationtraining
AT wangchenyu useofalifesizethreedimensionalprintedspinemodelforpediclescrewinstrumentationtraining
AT choikyungho useofalifesizethreedimensionalprintedspinemodelforpediclescrewinstrumentationtraining
AT kimhyongnyun useofalifesizethreedimensionalprintedspinemodelforpediclescrewinstrumentationtraining