Cargando…

Economic evaluation of health promotion interventions for older people: do applied economic studies meet the methodological challenges?

BACKGROUND: In the light of demographic developments health promotion interventions for older people are gaining importance. In addition to methodological challenges arising from the economic evaluation of health promotion interventions in general, there are specific methodological problems for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huter, Kai, Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Katarzyna, Kocot, Ewa, Kissimova-Skarbek, Katarzyna, Rothgang, Heinz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0100-4
_version_ 1783314835283378176
author Huter, Kai
Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Katarzyna
Kocot, Ewa
Kissimova-Skarbek, Katarzyna
Rothgang, Heinz
author_facet Huter, Kai
Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Katarzyna
Kocot, Ewa
Kissimova-Skarbek, Katarzyna
Rothgang, Heinz
author_sort Huter, Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the light of demographic developments health promotion interventions for older people are gaining importance. In addition to methodological challenges arising from the economic evaluation of health promotion interventions in general, there are specific methodological problems for the particular target group of older people. There are especially four main methodological challenges that are discussed in the literature. They concern measurement and valuation of informal caregiving, accounting for productivity costs, effects of unrelated cost in added life years and the inclusion of ‘beyond-health’ benefits. This paper focuses on the question whether and to what extent specific methodological requirements are actually met in applied health economic evaluations. METHODS: Following a systematic review of pertinent health economic evaluations, the included studies are analysed on the basis of four assessment criteria that are derived from methodological debates on the economic evaluation of health promotion interventions in general and economic evaluations targeting older people in particular. RESULTS: Of the 37 studies included in the systematic review, only very few include cost and outcome categories discussed as being of specific relevance to the assessment of health promotion interventions for older people. The few studies that consider these aspects use very heterogeneous methods, thus there is no common methodological standard. CONCLUSION: There is a strong need for the development of guidelines to achieve better comparability and to include cost categories and outcomes that are relevant for older people. Disregarding these methodological obstacles could implicitly lead to discrimination against the elderly in terms of health promotion and disease prevention and, hence, an age-based rationing of public health care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0100-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5902889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59028892018-04-23 Economic evaluation of health promotion interventions for older people: do applied economic studies meet the methodological challenges? Huter, Kai Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Katarzyna Kocot, Ewa Kissimova-Skarbek, Katarzyna Rothgang, Heinz Cost Eff Resour Alloc Review BACKGROUND: In the light of demographic developments health promotion interventions for older people are gaining importance. In addition to methodological challenges arising from the economic evaluation of health promotion interventions in general, there are specific methodological problems for the particular target group of older people. There are especially four main methodological challenges that are discussed in the literature. They concern measurement and valuation of informal caregiving, accounting for productivity costs, effects of unrelated cost in added life years and the inclusion of ‘beyond-health’ benefits. This paper focuses on the question whether and to what extent specific methodological requirements are actually met in applied health economic evaluations. METHODS: Following a systematic review of pertinent health economic evaluations, the included studies are analysed on the basis of four assessment criteria that are derived from methodological debates on the economic evaluation of health promotion interventions in general and economic evaluations targeting older people in particular. RESULTS: Of the 37 studies included in the systematic review, only very few include cost and outcome categories discussed as being of specific relevance to the assessment of health promotion interventions for older people. The few studies that consider these aspects use very heterogeneous methods, thus there is no common methodological standard. CONCLUSION: There is a strong need for the development of guidelines to achieve better comparability and to include cost categories and outcomes that are relevant for older people. Disregarding these methodological obstacles could implicitly lead to discrimination against the elderly in terms of health promotion and disease prevention and, hence, an age-based rationing of public health care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0100-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5902889/ /pubmed/29686540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0100-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Huter, Kai
Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Katarzyna
Kocot, Ewa
Kissimova-Skarbek, Katarzyna
Rothgang, Heinz
Economic evaluation of health promotion interventions for older people: do applied economic studies meet the methodological challenges?
title Economic evaluation of health promotion interventions for older people: do applied economic studies meet the methodological challenges?
title_full Economic evaluation of health promotion interventions for older people: do applied economic studies meet the methodological challenges?
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of health promotion interventions for older people: do applied economic studies meet the methodological challenges?
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of health promotion interventions for older people: do applied economic studies meet the methodological challenges?
title_short Economic evaluation of health promotion interventions for older people: do applied economic studies meet the methodological challenges?
title_sort economic evaluation of health promotion interventions for older people: do applied economic studies meet the methodological challenges?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0100-4
work_keys_str_mv AT huterkai economicevaluationofhealthpromotioninterventionsforolderpeopledoappliedeconomicstudiesmeetthemethodologicalchallenges
AT dubasjakobczykkatarzyna economicevaluationofhealthpromotioninterventionsforolderpeopledoappliedeconomicstudiesmeetthemethodologicalchallenges
AT kocotewa economicevaluationofhealthpromotioninterventionsforolderpeopledoappliedeconomicstudiesmeetthemethodologicalchallenges
AT kissimovaskarbekkatarzyna economicevaluationofhealthpromotioninterventionsforolderpeopledoappliedeconomicstudiesmeetthemethodologicalchallenges
AT rothgangheinz economicevaluationofhealthpromotioninterventionsforolderpeopledoappliedeconomicstudiesmeetthemethodologicalchallenges