Cargando…
ENdometrial cancer SURvivors’ follow-up carE (ENSURE): Less is more? Evaluating patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up schedule: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: It has often been hypothesized that the frequency of follow-up visits for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer could be decreased. However, studies evaluating effects of a reduced follow-up schedule among this patient group are lacking. The aim of this study is to assess patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29661218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2611-x |
_version_ | 1783314836469317632 |
---|---|
author | Ezendam, Nicole P. M. de Rooij, Belle H. Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M. Creutzberg, Carien L. van Loon, Ingrid Boll, Dorry Vos, M. Caroline van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. |
author_facet | Ezendam, Nicole P. M. de Rooij, Belle H. Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M. Creutzberg, Carien L. van Loon, Ingrid Boll, Dorry Vos, M. Caroline van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. |
author_sort | Ezendam, Nicole P. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It has often been hypothesized that the frequency of follow-up visits for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer could be decreased. However, studies evaluating effects of a reduced follow-up schedule among this patient group are lacking. The aim of this study is to assess patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a less frequent follow-up schedule compared to the schedule according to the Dutch guideline. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients diagnosed in the Netherlands with stage 1A and 1B low-risk endometrial cancer, for whom adjuvant radiotherapy is not indicated (n = 282), are randomized. Patients allocated to the intervention group receive four follow-up visits during three years. Patients allocated to the control group receive 10–13 follow-up visits during five years, according to the Dutch guideline. Patients are asked to fill out a questionnaire at baseline and after 6, 12, 36, and 60 months. Primary outcomes include patient satisfaction with follow-up care and cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes include healthcare use, adherence to schedule, health-related quality of life, fear of recurrence, anxiety and depression, information provision, recurrence, and survival. Linear regression analyses will be used to assess differences in patient satisfaction with follow-up care between intervention and control group. DISCUSSION: We anticipate that patients in the intervention arm have a similar satisfaction with follow-up care and overall outcomes, but lower healthcare use and costs than patients in the control arm. No differences are expected in quality-adjusted life-years and satisfaction, but the reduced schedule is expected to be cost-saving when implemented in the Netherlands. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02413606. Registered on 10 April 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2611-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5902894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59028942018-04-23 ENdometrial cancer SURvivors’ follow-up carE (ENSURE): Less is more? Evaluating patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up schedule: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial Ezendam, Nicole P. M. de Rooij, Belle H. Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M. Creutzberg, Carien L. van Loon, Ingrid Boll, Dorry Vos, M. Caroline van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: It has often been hypothesized that the frequency of follow-up visits for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer could be decreased. However, studies evaluating effects of a reduced follow-up schedule among this patient group are lacking. The aim of this study is to assess patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a less frequent follow-up schedule compared to the schedule according to the Dutch guideline. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients diagnosed in the Netherlands with stage 1A and 1B low-risk endometrial cancer, for whom adjuvant radiotherapy is not indicated (n = 282), are randomized. Patients allocated to the intervention group receive four follow-up visits during three years. Patients allocated to the control group receive 10–13 follow-up visits during five years, according to the Dutch guideline. Patients are asked to fill out a questionnaire at baseline and after 6, 12, 36, and 60 months. Primary outcomes include patient satisfaction with follow-up care and cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes include healthcare use, adherence to schedule, health-related quality of life, fear of recurrence, anxiety and depression, information provision, recurrence, and survival. Linear regression analyses will be used to assess differences in patient satisfaction with follow-up care between intervention and control group. DISCUSSION: We anticipate that patients in the intervention arm have a similar satisfaction with follow-up care and overall outcomes, but lower healthcare use and costs than patients in the control arm. No differences are expected in quality-adjusted life-years and satisfaction, but the reduced schedule is expected to be cost-saving when implemented in the Netherlands. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02413606. Registered on 10 April 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2611-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5902894/ /pubmed/29661218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2611-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Ezendam, Nicole P. M. de Rooij, Belle H. Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M. Creutzberg, Carien L. van Loon, Ingrid Boll, Dorry Vos, M. Caroline van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. ENdometrial cancer SURvivors’ follow-up carE (ENSURE): Less is more? Evaluating patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up schedule: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title | ENdometrial cancer SURvivors’ follow-up carE (ENSURE): Less is more? Evaluating patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up schedule: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | ENdometrial cancer SURvivors’ follow-up carE (ENSURE): Less is more? Evaluating patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up schedule: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | ENdometrial cancer SURvivors’ follow-up carE (ENSURE): Less is more? Evaluating patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up schedule: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | ENdometrial cancer SURvivors’ follow-up carE (ENSURE): Less is more? Evaluating patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up schedule: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | ENdometrial cancer SURvivors’ follow-up carE (ENSURE): Less is more? Evaluating patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up schedule: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | endometrial cancer survivors’ follow-up care (ensure): less is more? evaluating patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up schedule: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29661218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2611-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ezendamnicolepm endometrialcancersurvivorsfollowupcareensurelessismoreevaluatingpatientsatisfactionandcosteffectivenessofareducedfollowupschedulestudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT derooijbelleh endometrialcancersurvivorsfollowupcareensurelessismoreevaluatingpatientsatisfactionandcosteffectivenessofareducedfollowupschedulestudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kruitwagenroyfpm endometrialcancersurvivorsfollowupcareensurelessismoreevaluatingpatientsatisfactionandcosteffectivenessofareducedfollowupschedulestudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT creutzbergcarienl endometrialcancersurvivorsfollowupcareensurelessismoreevaluatingpatientsatisfactionandcosteffectivenessofareducedfollowupschedulestudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanlooningrid endometrialcancersurvivorsfollowupcareensurelessismoreevaluatingpatientsatisfactionandcosteffectivenessofareducedfollowupschedulestudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bolldorry endometrialcancersurvivorsfollowupcareensurelessismoreevaluatingpatientsatisfactionandcosteffectivenessofareducedfollowupschedulestudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vosmcaroline endometrialcancersurvivorsfollowupcareensurelessismoreevaluatingpatientsatisfactionandcosteffectivenessofareducedfollowupschedulestudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandepollfranselonnekev endometrialcancersurvivorsfollowupcareensurelessismoreevaluatingpatientsatisfactionandcosteffectivenessofareducedfollowupschedulestudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |