Cargando…

Diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Despite universal prophylaxis, late cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurs in a high proportion of kidney transplant recipients. We evaluated whether a specific viral T-cell response allows for the better identification of recipients who are at high risk of CMV infection after prophylaxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deborska-Materkowska, Dominika, Perkowska-Ptasinska, Agnieszka, Sadowska, Anna, Gozdowska, Jolanta, Ciszek, Michał, Serwanska-Swietek, Marta, Domagala, Piotr, Miszewska-Szyszkowska, Dorota, Sitarek, Elzbieta, Jozwik, Agnieszka, Kwiatkowski, Artur, Durlik, Magdalena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29661141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3075-z
_version_ 1783314847512920064
author Deborska-Materkowska, Dominika
Perkowska-Ptasinska, Agnieszka
Sadowska, Anna
Gozdowska, Jolanta
Ciszek, Michał
Serwanska-Swietek, Marta
Domagala, Piotr
Miszewska-Szyszkowska, Dorota
Sitarek, Elzbieta
Jozwik, Agnieszka
Kwiatkowski, Artur
Durlik, Magdalena
author_facet Deborska-Materkowska, Dominika
Perkowska-Ptasinska, Agnieszka
Sadowska, Anna
Gozdowska, Jolanta
Ciszek, Michał
Serwanska-Swietek, Marta
Domagala, Piotr
Miszewska-Szyszkowska, Dorota
Sitarek, Elzbieta
Jozwik, Agnieszka
Kwiatkowski, Artur
Durlik, Magdalena
author_sort Deborska-Materkowska, Dominika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite universal prophylaxis, late cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurs in a high proportion of kidney transplant recipients. We evaluated whether a specific viral T-cell response allows for the better identification of recipients who are at high risk of CMV infection after prophylaxis withdrawal. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in 19 pretransplant anti-CMV seronegative kidney graft recipients R- (18 from seropositive donors [D+] and one from a seronegative donor [D-]) and 67 seropositive recipients R(+) (59 from seropositive donors and eight from seronegative donors) who received antiviral prophylaxis with valganciclovir. The QuantiFERON-CMV (QF-CMV) assay was performed within the first and third months after transplantation. Blood samples were monitored for CMV DNAemia using a commercial quantitative nucleic acid amplification test (QNAT) that was calibrated to the World Health Organization International Standard. RESULTS: Twenty-one of the 86 patients (24%) developed CMV viremia after prophylaxis withdrawal within 12 months posttransplantation. In the CMV R(+) group, the QF-CMV assay yielded reactive results (QF-CMV[+]) in 51 of 67 patients (76%) compared with 7 of 19 patients (37%) in the CMV R(−) group (p = 0.001). In the CMV R(+) group, infection occurred in seven of 16 recipients (44%) who were QF-CMV(−) and eight of 51 recipients (16%) who were QF-CMV(+). In the CMV R(−) group, infection evolved in five of 12 recipients (42%) who were QF-CMV(−) and one of 7 recipients (14%) who were QF-CMV(+). No difference was found in the incidence of CMV infection stratified according to the QF-CMV results with regard to the recipients’ pretransplant CMV IgG serology (p = 0.985). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 15 of 36 patients (42%) with hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) 90 days posttransplantation compared with two of 34 patients (6%) without HGG (p = 0.0004). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in seven of 13 patients (54%) with lymphocytopenia compared with 14 of 70 patients (20%) without lymphocytopenia (p = 0.015). The multivariate analysis revealed that the nonreactive QuantiFERON-CMV assay was an independent risk factor for postprophylaxis CMV infection. CONCLUSIONS: In kidney transplant recipients who received posttransplantation prophylaxis, negative QF-CMV results better defined the risk of CMV infection than initial CMV IgG status after prophylaxis withdrawal. Hypogammaglobulinemia and lymphocytopenia were risk factors for CMV infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5902940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59029402018-04-23 Diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients Deborska-Materkowska, Dominika Perkowska-Ptasinska, Agnieszka Sadowska, Anna Gozdowska, Jolanta Ciszek, Michał Serwanska-Swietek, Marta Domagala, Piotr Miszewska-Szyszkowska, Dorota Sitarek, Elzbieta Jozwik, Agnieszka Kwiatkowski, Artur Durlik, Magdalena BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite universal prophylaxis, late cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurs in a high proportion of kidney transplant recipients. We evaluated whether a specific viral T-cell response allows for the better identification of recipients who are at high risk of CMV infection after prophylaxis withdrawal. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in 19 pretransplant anti-CMV seronegative kidney graft recipients R- (18 from seropositive donors [D+] and one from a seronegative donor [D-]) and 67 seropositive recipients R(+) (59 from seropositive donors and eight from seronegative donors) who received antiviral prophylaxis with valganciclovir. The QuantiFERON-CMV (QF-CMV) assay was performed within the first and third months after transplantation. Blood samples were monitored for CMV DNAemia using a commercial quantitative nucleic acid amplification test (QNAT) that was calibrated to the World Health Organization International Standard. RESULTS: Twenty-one of the 86 patients (24%) developed CMV viremia after prophylaxis withdrawal within 12 months posttransplantation. In the CMV R(+) group, the QF-CMV assay yielded reactive results (QF-CMV[+]) in 51 of 67 patients (76%) compared with 7 of 19 patients (37%) in the CMV R(−) group (p = 0.001). In the CMV R(+) group, infection occurred in seven of 16 recipients (44%) who were QF-CMV(−) and eight of 51 recipients (16%) who were QF-CMV(+). In the CMV R(−) group, infection evolved in five of 12 recipients (42%) who were QF-CMV(−) and one of 7 recipients (14%) who were QF-CMV(+). No difference was found in the incidence of CMV infection stratified according to the QF-CMV results with regard to the recipients’ pretransplant CMV IgG serology (p = 0.985). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 15 of 36 patients (42%) with hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) 90 days posttransplantation compared with two of 34 patients (6%) without HGG (p = 0.0004). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in seven of 13 patients (54%) with lymphocytopenia compared with 14 of 70 patients (20%) without lymphocytopenia (p = 0.015). The multivariate analysis revealed that the nonreactive QuantiFERON-CMV assay was an independent risk factor for postprophylaxis CMV infection. CONCLUSIONS: In kidney transplant recipients who received posttransplantation prophylaxis, negative QF-CMV results better defined the risk of CMV infection than initial CMV IgG status after prophylaxis withdrawal. Hypogammaglobulinemia and lymphocytopenia were risk factors for CMV infection. BioMed Central 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5902940/ /pubmed/29661141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3075-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deborska-Materkowska, Dominika
Perkowska-Ptasinska, Agnieszka
Sadowska, Anna
Gozdowska, Jolanta
Ciszek, Michał
Serwanska-Swietek, Marta
Domagala, Piotr
Miszewska-Szyszkowska, Dorota
Sitarek, Elzbieta
Jozwik, Agnieszka
Kwiatkowski, Artur
Durlik, Magdalena
Diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients
title Diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients
title_full Diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients
title_fullStr Diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients
title_short Diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients
title_sort diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by quantiferon-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5902940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29661141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3075-z
work_keys_str_mv AT deborskamaterkowskadominika diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT perkowskaptasinskaagnieszka diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT sadowskaanna diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT gozdowskajolanta diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT ciszekmichał diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT serwanskaswietekmarta diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT domagalapiotr diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT miszewskaszyszkowskadorota diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT sitarekelzbieta diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT jozwikagnieszka diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT kwiatkowskiartur diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients
AT durlikmagdalena diagnosticutilityofmonitoringcytomegalovirusspecificimmunitybyquantiferoncytomegalovirusassayinkidneytransplantrecipients