Cargando…

Comparative study of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for bilateral maxillary nerve block during pediatric primary cleft palate surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate are common major congenital anomalies. Cleft palate (CP) repair causes pain and needs large doses of intravenous opioids. The risk of postoperative airway obstruction or respiratory depression is high, requiring continuous and vigilant monitoring. The primary outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mostafa, Mohamed F., Herdan, Ragaa, Elshazly, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619786
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.135
_version_ 1783314887387119616
author Mostafa, Mohamed F.
Herdan, Ragaa
Elshazly, Mohamed
author_facet Mostafa, Mohamed F.
Herdan, Ragaa
Elshazly, Mohamed
author_sort Mostafa, Mohamed F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate are common major congenital anomalies. Cleft palate (CP) repair causes pain and needs large doses of intravenous opioids. The risk of postoperative airway obstruction or respiratory depression is high, requiring continuous and vigilant monitoring. The primary outcome was to evaluate the efficacy of using different local anesthetics during bilateral maxillary nerve block (MNB) with general anesthesia on quality of recovery after primary CP repair. We hypothesized that levobupivacaine would be better than bupivacaine. Also, to investigate the potency of bilateral MNB in improving quality of postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Sixty children undergoing primary CP repair surgery were enrolled in the study. Combined general anesthesia and regional bilateral MNB were used for all patients. Group L (n = 30): children received 0.15 ml/kg of 0.2% levobupivacaine, while in Group B (n = 30): children received 0.15 ml/kg of 0.2% bupivacaine. RESULTS: Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability pain score readings were 0 score in 7 cases of the Group L and 10 cases of Group B, 1 score in 14 cases of the Group L and 12 cases of Group B, and 2 score in 9 cases of the Group L and 8 cases of Group B. We found no statistically significant difference between the two study groups as regarding pain score or serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine is as effective and safe as bupivacaine to be used for MNB block with a lower incidence of complications. Bilateral suprazygomatic MNB is an effective, easy, and safe method for pain relief in children undergoing primary cleft palate repair surgeries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5903109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59031092018-05-01 Comparative study of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for bilateral maxillary nerve block during pediatric primary cleft palate surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study Mostafa, Mohamed F. Herdan, Ragaa Elshazly, Mohamed Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate are common major congenital anomalies. Cleft palate (CP) repair causes pain and needs large doses of intravenous opioids. The risk of postoperative airway obstruction or respiratory depression is high, requiring continuous and vigilant monitoring. The primary outcome was to evaluate the efficacy of using different local anesthetics during bilateral maxillary nerve block (MNB) with general anesthesia on quality of recovery after primary CP repair. We hypothesized that levobupivacaine would be better than bupivacaine. Also, to investigate the potency of bilateral MNB in improving quality of postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Sixty children undergoing primary CP repair surgery were enrolled in the study. Combined general anesthesia and regional bilateral MNB were used for all patients. Group L (n = 30): children received 0.15 ml/kg of 0.2% levobupivacaine, while in Group B (n = 30): children received 0.15 ml/kg of 0.2% bupivacaine. RESULTS: Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability pain score readings were 0 score in 7 cases of the Group L and 10 cases of Group B, 1 score in 14 cases of the Group L and 12 cases of Group B, and 2 score in 9 cases of the Group L and 8 cases of Group B. We found no statistically significant difference between the two study groups as regarding pain score or serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine is as effective and safe as bupivacaine to be used for MNB block with a lower incidence of complications. Bilateral suprazygomatic MNB is an effective, easy, and safe method for pain relief in children undergoing primary cleft palate repair surgeries. Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2018-04 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5903109/ /pubmed/29619786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.135 Text en Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2018 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Mostafa, Mohamed F.
Herdan, Ragaa
Elshazly, Mohamed
Comparative study of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for bilateral maxillary nerve block during pediatric primary cleft palate surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study
title Comparative study of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for bilateral maxillary nerve block during pediatric primary cleft palate surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study
title_full Comparative study of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for bilateral maxillary nerve block during pediatric primary cleft palate surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study
title_fullStr Comparative study of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for bilateral maxillary nerve block during pediatric primary cleft palate surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for bilateral maxillary nerve block during pediatric primary cleft palate surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study
title_short Comparative study of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for bilateral maxillary nerve block during pediatric primary cleft palate surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study
title_sort comparative study of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for bilateral maxillary nerve block during pediatric primary cleft palate surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619786
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.135
work_keys_str_mv AT mostafamohamedf comparativestudyoflevobupivacaineandbupivacaineforbilateralmaxillarynerveblockduringpediatricprimarycleftpalatesurgeryarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledstudy
AT herdanragaa comparativestudyoflevobupivacaineandbupivacaineforbilateralmaxillarynerveblockduringpediatricprimarycleftpalatesurgeryarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledstudy
AT elshazlymohamed comparativestudyoflevobupivacaineandbupivacaineforbilateralmaxillarynerveblockduringpediatricprimarycleftpalatesurgeryarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledstudy