Cargando…
The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is controversial. Limited studies have demonstrated the satisfactory outcomes of percutaneous adhesiolysis in FBSS, which can be performed as a 1 day or 3 days procedure. In the current randomized clinical trial, we compared th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kowsar
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29696119 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.60271 |
_version_ | 1783314911718277120 |
---|---|
author | Hossieni, Behnam Dadkhah, Payman Moradi, Siamak Hashemi, Seyed Masoud Safdari, Farshad |
author_facet | Hossieni, Behnam Dadkhah, Payman Moradi, Siamak Hashemi, Seyed Masoud Safdari, Farshad |
author_sort | Hossieni, Behnam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is controversial. Limited studies have demonstrated the satisfactory outcomes of percutaneous adhesiolysis in FBSS, which can be performed as a 1 day or 3 days procedure. In the current randomized clinical trial, we compared the clinical and functional outcomes of these 2 techniques. METHODS: In this study, 60 patients with FBSS were randomly assigned into 2 equal groups: 1 day group and 3 days group. Before and at 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure, pain intensity was measured using visual analogue scale (VAS). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) was also completed. Pain reduction of 50% or more was defined as treatment success. RESULTS: Significant pain relief and ODI improvement were obtained in the 2 groups with adhesiolysis (P < 0.001). However, pain intensity remained the same before and at 4 and 12 weeks after adhesiolysis. ODI score was significantly lower in 1 day group in the 1 month visit (P < 0.001). Treatment was successful in 76.7% and 83.3% of the patients in 1 day and 3 days groups, respectively (P = 0.519). CONCLUSIONS: Adhesiolysis is an effective treatment for pain relief and functional improvement in FBSS. The results of 1 day and 3 days procedures are comparable. Based on these findings, the authors recommend using 1 day technique, which can potentially decrease the patients' discomfort, hospital stay, and cost of treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5903221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Kowsar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59032212018-04-25 The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols Hossieni, Behnam Dadkhah, Payman Moradi, Siamak Hashemi, Seyed Masoud Safdari, Farshad Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is controversial. Limited studies have demonstrated the satisfactory outcomes of percutaneous adhesiolysis in FBSS, which can be performed as a 1 day or 3 days procedure. In the current randomized clinical trial, we compared the clinical and functional outcomes of these 2 techniques. METHODS: In this study, 60 patients with FBSS were randomly assigned into 2 equal groups: 1 day group and 3 days group. Before and at 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure, pain intensity was measured using visual analogue scale (VAS). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) was also completed. Pain reduction of 50% or more was defined as treatment success. RESULTS: Significant pain relief and ODI improvement were obtained in the 2 groups with adhesiolysis (P < 0.001). However, pain intensity remained the same before and at 4 and 12 weeks after adhesiolysis. ODI score was significantly lower in 1 day group in the 1 month visit (P < 0.001). Treatment was successful in 76.7% and 83.3% of the patients in 1 day and 3 days groups, respectively (P = 0.519). CONCLUSIONS: Adhesiolysis is an effective treatment for pain relief and functional improvement in FBSS. The results of 1 day and 3 days procedures are comparable. Based on these findings, the authors recommend using 1 day technique, which can potentially decrease the patients' discomfort, hospital stay, and cost of treatment. Kowsar 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5903221/ /pubmed/29696119 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.60271 Text en Copyright © 2017, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hossieni, Behnam Dadkhah, Payman Moradi, Siamak Hashemi, Seyed Masoud Safdari, Farshad The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols |
title | The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols |
title_full | The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols |
title_fullStr | The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols |
title_short | The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols |
title_sort | results of treating failed back surgery syndrome by adhesiolysis: comparing the one- and three-day protocols |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29696119 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.60271 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hossienibehnam theresultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols AT dadkhahpayman theresultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols AT moradisiamak theresultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols AT hashemiseyedmasoud theresultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols AT safdarifarshad theresultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols AT hossienibehnam resultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols AT dadkhahpayman resultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols AT moradisiamak resultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols AT hashemiseyedmasoud resultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols AT safdarifarshad resultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols |