Cargando…

The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is controversial. Limited studies have demonstrated the satisfactory outcomes of percutaneous adhesiolysis in FBSS, which can be performed as a 1 day or 3 days procedure. In the current randomized clinical trial, we compared th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hossieni, Behnam, Dadkhah, Payman, Moradi, Siamak, Hashemi, Seyed Masoud, Safdari, Farshad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29696119
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.60271
_version_ 1783314911718277120
author Hossieni, Behnam
Dadkhah, Payman
Moradi, Siamak
Hashemi, Seyed Masoud
Safdari, Farshad
author_facet Hossieni, Behnam
Dadkhah, Payman
Moradi, Siamak
Hashemi, Seyed Masoud
Safdari, Farshad
author_sort Hossieni, Behnam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is controversial. Limited studies have demonstrated the satisfactory outcomes of percutaneous adhesiolysis in FBSS, which can be performed as a 1 day or 3 days procedure. In the current randomized clinical trial, we compared the clinical and functional outcomes of these 2 techniques. METHODS: In this study, 60 patients with FBSS were randomly assigned into 2 equal groups: 1 day group and 3 days group. Before and at 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure, pain intensity was measured using visual analogue scale (VAS). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) was also completed. Pain reduction of 50% or more was defined as treatment success. RESULTS: Significant pain relief and ODI improvement were obtained in the 2 groups with adhesiolysis (P < 0.001). However, pain intensity remained the same before and at 4 and 12 weeks after adhesiolysis. ODI score was significantly lower in 1 day group in the 1 month visit (P < 0.001). Treatment was successful in 76.7% and 83.3% of the patients in 1 day and 3 days groups, respectively (P = 0.519). CONCLUSIONS: Adhesiolysis is an effective treatment for pain relief and functional improvement in FBSS. The results of 1 day and 3 days procedures are comparable. Based on these findings, the authors recommend using 1 day technique, which can potentially decrease the patients' discomfort, hospital stay, and cost of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5903221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59032212018-04-25 The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols Hossieni, Behnam Dadkhah, Payman Moradi, Siamak Hashemi, Seyed Masoud Safdari, Farshad Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is controversial. Limited studies have demonstrated the satisfactory outcomes of percutaneous adhesiolysis in FBSS, which can be performed as a 1 day or 3 days procedure. In the current randomized clinical trial, we compared the clinical and functional outcomes of these 2 techniques. METHODS: In this study, 60 patients with FBSS were randomly assigned into 2 equal groups: 1 day group and 3 days group. Before and at 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure, pain intensity was measured using visual analogue scale (VAS). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) was also completed. Pain reduction of 50% or more was defined as treatment success. RESULTS: Significant pain relief and ODI improvement were obtained in the 2 groups with adhesiolysis (P < 0.001). However, pain intensity remained the same before and at 4 and 12 weeks after adhesiolysis. ODI score was significantly lower in 1 day group in the 1 month visit (P < 0.001). Treatment was successful in 76.7% and 83.3% of the patients in 1 day and 3 days groups, respectively (P = 0.519). CONCLUSIONS: Adhesiolysis is an effective treatment for pain relief and functional improvement in FBSS. The results of 1 day and 3 days procedures are comparable. Based on these findings, the authors recommend using 1 day technique, which can potentially decrease the patients' discomfort, hospital stay, and cost of treatment. Kowsar 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5903221/ /pubmed/29696119 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.60271 Text en Copyright © 2017, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hossieni, Behnam
Dadkhah, Payman
Moradi, Siamak
Hashemi, Seyed Masoud
Safdari, Farshad
The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols
title The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols
title_full The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols
title_fullStr The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols
title_full_unstemmed The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols
title_short The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols
title_sort results of treating failed back surgery syndrome by adhesiolysis: comparing the one- and three-day protocols
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29696119
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.60271
work_keys_str_mv AT hossienibehnam theresultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols
AT dadkhahpayman theresultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols
AT moradisiamak theresultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols
AT hashemiseyedmasoud theresultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols
AT safdarifarshad theresultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols
AT hossienibehnam resultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols
AT dadkhahpayman resultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols
AT moradisiamak resultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols
AT hashemiseyedmasoud resultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols
AT safdarifarshad resultsoftreatingfailedbacksurgerysyndromebyadhesiolysiscomparingtheoneandthreedayprotocols