Cargando…

The Value of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has challenged the traditional management of ulcerative colitis (UC) in recent years, while it remained controversial. We aimed to provide a systematic protocol of FMT treatment on UC. METHODS: Studies reporting on FMT treatment in UC patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Yantian, Zhang, Bangjie, Wu, Yuanyuan, Wang, Qingzhi, Wang, Jie, Shen, Fangfang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5480961
_version_ 1783314924178505728
author Cao, Yantian
Zhang, Bangjie
Wu, Yuanyuan
Wang, Qingzhi
Wang, Jie
Shen, Fangfang
author_facet Cao, Yantian
Zhang, Bangjie
Wu, Yuanyuan
Wang, Qingzhi
Wang, Jie
Shen, Fangfang
author_sort Cao, Yantian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has challenged the traditional management of ulcerative colitis (UC) in recent years, while it remained controversial. We aimed to provide a systematic protocol of FMT treatment on UC. METHODS: Studies reporting on FMT treatment in UC patients were performed. A fixed-effect model was used to assess the efficacy of FMT. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were enrolled (n = 446). A pooled proportion of patients who received FMT had a significant efficacy compared to the placebo group (odds ratio (OR): 2.73, P = 0.002) with a low risk of heterogeneity (P = 0.59, I(2) = 0%). The Mayo score decreased to 5 points in a state of mild–moderate activity after FMT treatment, and the optimal range of the Mayo score baseline was 6–9 for FMT administration. Then, the baseline of the Shannon diversity index (SDI) had a negative correlation with the clinical response rate (R = −0.992, P = 0.08) or remission rate (R = −0.998, P = 0.036), and the optimal diversity of bacteria was at 7 days to one month. Moreover, the colonoscopy delivery and unrelated fecal donor had slight superiorities of FMT treatment. CONCLUSION: FMT treatment had a higher efficacy and shorter time-point of early assessment of effectiveness on UC patients compared to traditional therapies. And the optimal FMT delivery and donor were colonoscopy delivery and unrelated donor in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5903331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59033312018-05-30 The Value of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Cao, Yantian Zhang, Bangjie Wu, Yuanyuan Wang, Qingzhi Wang, Jie Shen, Fangfang Gastroenterol Res Pract Review Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has challenged the traditional management of ulcerative colitis (UC) in recent years, while it remained controversial. We aimed to provide a systematic protocol of FMT treatment on UC. METHODS: Studies reporting on FMT treatment in UC patients were performed. A fixed-effect model was used to assess the efficacy of FMT. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were enrolled (n = 446). A pooled proportion of patients who received FMT had a significant efficacy compared to the placebo group (odds ratio (OR): 2.73, P = 0.002) with a low risk of heterogeneity (P = 0.59, I(2) = 0%). The Mayo score decreased to 5 points in a state of mild–moderate activity after FMT treatment, and the optimal range of the Mayo score baseline was 6–9 for FMT administration. Then, the baseline of the Shannon diversity index (SDI) had a negative correlation with the clinical response rate (R = −0.992, P = 0.08) or remission rate (R = −0.998, P = 0.036), and the optimal diversity of bacteria was at 7 days to one month. Moreover, the colonoscopy delivery and unrelated fecal donor had slight superiorities of FMT treatment. CONCLUSION: FMT treatment had a higher efficacy and shorter time-point of early assessment of effectiveness on UC patients compared to traditional therapies. And the optimal FMT delivery and donor were colonoscopy delivery and unrelated donor in clinical practice. Hindawi 2018-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5903331/ /pubmed/29849592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5480961 Text en Copyright © 2018 Yantian Cao et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cao, Yantian
Zhang, Bangjie
Wu, Yuanyuan
Wang, Qingzhi
Wang, Jie
Shen, Fangfang
The Value of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Value of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Value of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Value of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Value of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort value of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of ulcerative colitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5480961
work_keys_str_mv AT caoyantian thevalueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangbangjie thevalueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuyuanyuan thevalueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangqingzhi thevalueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangjie thevalueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenfangfang thevalueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caoyantian valueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangbangjie valueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuyuanyuan valueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangqingzhi valueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangjie valueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenfangfang valueoffecalmicrobiotatransplantationinthetreatmentofulcerativecolitispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis