Cargando…

Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11)

PURPOSE: To investigate interobserver variation in target volume delineations for prostate cancer salvage radiotherapy using planning computed tomography (CT) versus combined planning CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten radiation oncologists independently delineated a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Eonju, Park, Won, Ahn, Sung Hwan, Cho, Jae Ho, Kim, Jin Hee, Cho, Kwan Ho, Choi, Young Min, Kim, Jae-Sung, Kim, Jin Ho, Jang, Hong-Seok, Kim, Young-Seok, Nam, Taek-Keun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29207866
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00080
_version_ 1783314932084768768
author Lee, Eonju
Park, Won
Ahn, Sung Hwan
Cho, Jae Ho
Kim, Jin Hee
Cho, Kwan Ho
Choi, Young Min
Kim, Jae-Sung
Kim, Jin Ho
Jang, Hong-Seok
Kim, Young-Seok
Nam, Taek-Keun
author_facet Lee, Eonju
Park, Won
Ahn, Sung Hwan
Cho, Jae Ho
Kim, Jin Hee
Cho, Kwan Ho
Choi, Young Min
Kim, Jae-Sung
Kim, Jin Ho
Jang, Hong-Seok
Kim, Young-Seok
Nam, Taek-Keun
author_sort Lee, Eonju
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate interobserver variation in target volume delineations for prostate cancer salvage radiotherapy using planning computed tomography (CT) versus combined planning CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten radiation oncologists independently delineated a target volume on the planning CT scans of five cases with different pathological status after radical prostatectomy. Two weeks later, this was repeated with the addition of planning MRI. The volumes obtained with CT only and combined CT and MRI were compared, and the effect of the addition of planning MRI on interobserver variability was assessed. RESULTS: There were large differences in clinical target volume (CTV) delineated by each observer, regardless of the addition of planning MRI (9.44–139.27 cm(3) in CT only and 7.77–122.83 cm(3) in CT plus MRI) and no significant differences in the mean and standard deviation of CTV. However, there were decreases in mean volume and standard deviation as a result of using the planning MRI. CONCLUSION: This study showed substantial interobserver variation in target volume delineation for salvage radiotherapy. The combination of planning MRI with CT tended to decrease the target volume and the variation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5903365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59033652018-04-19 Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11) Lee, Eonju Park, Won Ahn, Sung Hwan Cho, Jae Ho Kim, Jin Hee Cho, Kwan Ho Choi, Young Min Kim, Jae-Sung Kim, Jin Ho Jang, Hong-Seok Kim, Young-Seok Nam, Taek-Keun Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate interobserver variation in target volume delineations for prostate cancer salvage radiotherapy using planning computed tomography (CT) versus combined planning CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten radiation oncologists independently delineated a target volume on the planning CT scans of five cases with different pathological status after radical prostatectomy. Two weeks later, this was repeated with the addition of planning MRI. The volumes obtained with CT only and combined CT and MRI were compared, and the effect of the addition of planning MRI on interobserver variability was assessed. RESULTS: There were large differences in clinical target volume (CTV) delineated by each observer, regardless of the addition of planning MRI (9.44–139.27 cm(3) in CT only and 7.77–122.83 cm(3) in CT plus MRI) and no significant differences in the mean and standard deviation of CTV. However, there were decreases in mean volume and standard deviation as a result of using the planning MRI. CONCLUSION: This study showed substantial interobserver variation in target volume delineation for salvage radiotherapy. The combination of planning MRI with CT tended to decrease the target volume and the variation. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018-03 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5903365/ /pubmed/29207866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00080 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Eonju
Park, Won
Ahn, Sung Hwan
Cho, Jae Ho
Kim, Jin Hee
Cho, Kwan Ho
Choi, Young Min
Kim, Jae-Sung
Kim, Jin Ho
Jang, Hong-Seok
Kim, Young-Seok
Nam, Taek-Keun
Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11)
title Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11)
title_full Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11)
title_fullStr Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11)
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11)
title_short Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11)
title_sort interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using ct versus combined ct and mri: a multicenter study (krog 13-11)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29207866
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00080
work_keys_str_mv AT leeeonju interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT parkwon interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT ahnsunghwan interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT chojaeho interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT kimjinhee interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT chokwanho interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT choiyoungmin interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT kimjaesung interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT kimjinho interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT janghongseok interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT kimyoungseok interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311
AT namtaekkeun interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311