Cargando…
Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11)
PURPOSE: To investigate interobserver variation in target volume delineations for prostate cancer salvage radiotherapy using planning computed tomography (CT) versus combined planning CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten radiation oncologists independently delineated a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29207866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00080 |
_version_ | 1783314932084768768 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Eonju Park, Won Ahn, Sung Hwan Cho, Jae Ho Kim, Jin Hee Cho, Kwan Ho Choi, Young Min Kim, Jae-Sung Kim, Jin Ho Jang, Hong-Seok Kim, Young-Seok Nam, Taek-Keun |
author_facet | Lee, Eonju Park, Won Ahn, Sung Hwan Cho, Jae Ho Kim, Jin Hee Cho, Kwan Ho Choi, Young Min Kim, Jae-Sung Kim, Jin Ho Jang, Hong-Seok Kim, Young-Seok Nam, Taek-Keun |
author_sort | Lee, Eonju |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate interobserver variation in target volume delineations for prostate cancer salvage radiotherapy using planning computed tomography (CT) versus combined planning CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten radiation oncologists independently delineated a target volume on the planning CT scans of five cases with different pathological status after radical prostatectomy. Two weeks later, this was repeated with the addition of planning MRI. The volumes obtained with CT only and combined CT and MRI were compared, and the effect of the addition of planning MRI on interobserver variability was assessed. RESULTS: There were large differences in clinical target volume (CTV) delineated by each observer, regardless of the addition of planning MRI (9.44–139.27 cm(3) in CT only and 7.77–122.83 cm(3) in CT plus MRI) and no significant differences in the mean and standard deviation of CTV. However, there were decreases in mean volume and standard deviation as a result of using the planning MRI. CONCLUSION: This study showed substantial interobserver variation in target volume delineation for salvage radiotherapy. The combination of planning MRI with CT tended to decrease the target volume and the variation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5903365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59033652018-04-19 Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11) Lee, Eonju Park, Won Ahn, Sung Hwan Cho, Jae Ho Kim, Jin Hee Cho, Kwan Ho Choi, Young Min Kim, Jae-Sung Kim, Jin Ho Jang, Hong-Seok Kim, Young-Seok Nam, Taek-Keun Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate interobserver variation in target volume delineations for prostate cancer salvage radiotherapy using planning computed tomography (CT) versus combined planning CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten radiation oncologists independently delineated a target volume on the planning CT scans of five cases with different pathological status after radical prostatectomy. Two weeks later, this was repeated with the addition of planning MRI. The volumes obtained with CT only and combined CT and MRI were compared, and the effect of the addition of planning MRI on interobserver variability was assessed. RESULTS: There were large differences in clinical target volume (CTV) delineated by each observer, regardless of the addition of planning MRI (9.44–139.27 cm(3) in CT only and 7.77–122.83 cm(3) in CT plus MRI) and no significant differences in the mean and standard deviation of CTV. However, there were decreases in mean volume and standard deviation as a result of using the planning MRI. CONCLUSION: This study showed substantial interobserver variation in target volume delineation for salvage radiotherapy. The combination of planning MRI with CT tended to decrease the target volume and the variation. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018-03 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5903365/ /pubmed/29207866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00080 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Eonju Park, Won Ahn, Sung Hwan Cho, Jae Ho Kim, Jin Hee Cho, Kwan Ho Choi, Young Min Kim, Jae-Sung Kim, Jin Ho Jang, Hong-Seok Kim, Young-Seok Nam, Taek-Keun Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11) |
title | Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11) |
title_full | Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11) |
title_fullStr | Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11) |
title_full_unstemmed | Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11) |
title_short | Interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using CT versus combined CT and MRI: a multicenter study (KROG 13-11) |
title_sort | interobserver variation in target volume for salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy using ct versus combined ct and mri: a multicenter study (krog 13-11) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29207866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeeonju interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT parkwon interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT ahnsunghwan interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT chojaeho interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT kimjinhee interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT chokwanho interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT choiyoungmin interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT kimjaesung interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT kimjinho interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT janghongseok interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT kimyoungseok interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 AT namtaekkeun interobservervariationintargetvolumeforsalvageradiotherapyinrecurrentprostatecancerpatientsafterradicalprostatectomyusingctversuscombinedctandmriamulticenterstudykrog1311 |