Cargando…

What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review

INTRODUCTION: Design and provision of good quality maternity care should incorporate what matters to childbearing women. This qualitative systematic review was undertaken to inform WHO intrapartum guidelines. METHODS: Using a pre-determined search strategy, we searched Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Downe, Soo, Finlayson, Kenneth, Oladapo, Olufemi, Bonet, Mercedes, Gülmezoglu, A. Metin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29664907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194906
_version_ 1783314968841551872
author Downe, Soo
Finlayson, Kenneth
Oladapo, Olufemi
Bonet, Mercedes
Gülmezoglu, A. Metin
author_facet Downe, Soo
Finlayson, Kenneth
Oladapo, Olufemi
Bonet, Mercedes
Gülmezoglu, A. Metin
author_sort Downe, Soo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Design and provision of good quality maternity care should incorporate what matters to childbearing women. This qualitative systematic review was undertaken to inform WHO intrapartum guidelines. METHODS: Using a pre-determined search strategy, we searched Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, EMBASE, LILACS, AJOL, and reference lists of eligible studies published 1996-August 2016 (updated to January 2018), reporting qualitative data on womens’ childbirth beliefs, expectations, and values. Studies including specific interventions or health conditions were excluded. PRISMA guidelines were followed. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Authors’ findings were extracted, logged on a study-specific data form, and synthesised using meta-ethnographic techniques. Confidence in the quality, coherence, relevance and adequacy of data underpinning the resulting themes was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. A line of argument synthesis was developed. RESULTS: 35 studies (19 countries) were included in the primary search, and 2 in the update. Confidence in most results was moderate to high. What mattered to most women was a positive experience that fulfilled or exceeded their prior personal and socio-cultural beliefs and expectations. This included giving birth to a healthy baby in a clinically and psychologically safe environment with practical and emotional support from birth companions, and competent, reassuring, kind clinical staff. Most wanted a physiological labour and birth, while acknowledging that birth can be unpredictable and frightening, and that they may need to ‘go with the flow’. If intervention was needed or wanted, women wanted to retain a sense of personal achievement and control through active decision-making. These values and expectations were mediated through womens’ embodied (physical and psychosocial) experience of pregnancy and birth; local familial and sociocultural norms; and encounters with local maternity services and staff. CONCLUSIONS: Most healthy childbearing women want a positive birth experience. Safety and psychosocial wellbeing are equally valued. Maternity care should be designed to fulfil or exceed womens’ personal and socio-cultural beliefs and expectations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5903648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59036482018-04-27 What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review Downe, Soo Finlayson, Kenneth Oladapo, Olufemi Bonet, Mercedes Gülmezoglu, A. Metin PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Design and provision of good quality maternity care should incorporate what matters to childbearing women. This qualitative systematic review was undertaken to inform WHO intrapartum guidelines. METHODS: Using a pre-determined search strategy, we searched Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, EMBASE, LILACS, AJOL, and reference lists of eligible studies published 1996-August 2016 (updated to January 2018), reporting qualitative data on womens’ childbirth beliefs, expectations, and values. Studies including specific interventions or health conditions were excluded. PRISMA guidelines were followed. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Authors’ findings were extracted, logged on a study-specific data form, and synthesised using meta-ethnographic techniques. Confidence in the quality, coherence, relevance and adequacy of data underpinning the resulting themes was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. A line of argument synthesis was developed. RESULTS: 35 studies (19 countries) were included in the primary search, and 2 in the update. Confidence in most results was moderate to high. What mattered to most women was a positive experience that fulfilled or exceeded their prior personal and socio-cultural beliefs and expectations. This included giving birth to a healthy baby in a clinically and psychologically safe environment with practical and emotional support from birth companions, and competent, reassuring, kind clinical staff. Most wanted a physiological labour and birth, while acknowledging that birth can be unpredictable and frightening, and that they may need to ‘go with the flow’. If intervention was needed or wanted, women wanted to retain a sense of personal achievement and control through active decision-making. These values and expectations were mediated through womens’ embodied (physical and psychosocial) experience of pregnancy and birth; local familial and sociocultural norms; and encounters with local maternity services and staff. CONCLUSIONS: Most healthy childbearing women want a positive birth experience. Safety and psychosocial wellbeing are equally valued. Maternity care should be designed to fulfil or exceed womens’ personal and socio-cultural beliefs and expectations. Public Library of Science 2018-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5903648/ /pubmed/29664907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194906 Text en © 2018 Downe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Downe, Soo
Finlayson, Kenneth
Oladapo, Olufemi
Bonet, Mercedes
Gülmezoglu, A. Metin
What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review
title What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review
title_full What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review
title_fullStr What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review
title_full_unstemmed What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review
title_short What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review
title_sort what matters to women during childbirth: a systematic qualitative review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29664907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194906
work_keys_str_mv AT downesoo whatmatterstowomenduringchildbirthasystematicqualitativereview
AT finlaysonkenneth whatmatterstowomenduringchildbirthasystematicqualitativereview
AT oladapoolufemi whatmatterstowomenduringchildbirthasystematicqualitativereview
AT bonetmercedes whatmatterstowomenduringchildbirthasystematicqualitativereview
AT gulmezogluametin whatmatterstowomenduringchildbirthasystematicqualitativereview