Cargando…
Caustic Ingestion in Children in South of Iran: A Two-Year Single Center Study
BACKGROUND Caustic ingestion is one of the most important injuries during childhood, which leads to serious sequel. In this study, we evaluated the clinical manifestations, endoscopic appearance, complications, and treatment results in patients with caustic ingestion in our hospital. METHODS Hospita...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Association of Gastroerterology and Hepatology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5903924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682245 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/mejdd.2017.87 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND Caustic ingestion is one of the most important injuries during childhood, which leads to serious sequel. In this study, we evaluated the clinical manifestations, endoscopic appearance, complications, and treatment results in patients with caustic ingestion in our hospital. METHODS Hospital chart of patients with caustic ingestion who admitted to Nemazee Teaching Hospital affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences during a 2-year period (2015-2016) were reviewed retrospectively. The age, sex, nature of the caustic agent, clinical presentations, grade of injury in endoscopy, degree of parents’ education, site of ingestion, accidental or intentional attempts, complications, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS In this study the charts of 41 patients (26 boys and 15 girls) with caustic ingestion over the 2-year period were reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 4.4 year. Of them, 95.1% had ingested the materials accidentally, and 2 (4.9%) patients had ingested unknown substances for suicidal attempt. Of all cases, 68.3% of caustic ingestion occurred in the kitchen. 19 (46.3%) agents were acidic substances and 17 (41.5%) were alkali agents. 5 (12.1%) patients ingested unknown substances. 24.3% of the patients were asymptomatic and the most common presentation was drooling (34.14%). 26.8% of the patients had dysphagia, and 24.3% presented with oral ulcer. 7.3% had abdominal pain, 4.8% had fever, and 2.4% had hematemesis. 14 (34.1%) patients had normal feature, 6 (14.6%) had grade I injury, 12 (29.3%) had grade II injury, and 8 (19.5%) had grade III injury in endoscopic evaluation. CONCLUSION Most of the caustic ingestion occurred in kitchen. Male was the dominant sex in the caustic injury. |
---|