Cargando…

Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality

BACKGROUND: A newly introduced PET/CT scanner (Discovery Meaningful Insights—DMI, GE Healthcare) includes the silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) with time-of-flight (TOF) technology first used in the GE SIGNA PET/MRI. In this study, we investigated the impact of various acquisition times on image qualit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonni, Ida, Baratto, Lucia, Park, Sonya, Hatami, Negin, Srinivas, Shyam, Davidzon, Guido, Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam, Iagaru, Andrei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29666972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0207-x
_version_ 1783315026029838336
author Sonni, Ida
Baratto, Lucia
Park, Sonya
Hatami, Negin
Srinivas, Shyam
Davidzon, Guido
Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam
Iagaru, Andrei
author_facet Sonni, Ida
Baratto, Lucia
Park, Sonya
Hatami, Negin
Srinivas, Shyam
Davidzon, Guido
Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam
Iagaru, Andrei
author_sort Sonni, Ida
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A newly introduced PET/CT scanner (Discovery Meaningful Insights—DMI, GE Healthcare) includes the silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) with time-of-flight (TOF) technology first used in the GE SIGNA PET/MRI. In this study, we investigated the impact of various acquisition times on image quality using this SiPM-based PET/CT. METHODS: We reviewed data from 58 participants with cancer who were scanned using the DMI PET/CT scanner. The administered dosages ranged 295.3–429.9 MBq (mean ± SD 356.3 ± 37.4) and imaging started at 71–142 min (mean ± SD 101.41 ± 17.52) after administration of the radiopharmaceutical. The patients’ BMI ranged 19.79–46.16 (mean ± SD 26.55 ± 5.53). We retrospectively reconstructed the raw TOF data at 30, 60, 90, and 120 s/bed and at the standard image acquisition time per clinical protocol (180 or 210 s/bed depending on BMI). Each reconstruction was reviewed blindly by two nuclear medicine physicians and scored 1–5 (1—poor, 5—excellent quality). The liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was used as a quantitative measure of image quality. RESULTS: The average scores ± SD of the readers were 2.61 ± 0.83, 3.70 ± 0.92, 4.36 ± 0.82, 4.82 ± 0.39, and 4.91 ± 0.91 for the 30, 60, 90, and 120 s/bed and at standard acquisition time, respectively. Inter-reader agreement on image quality assessment was good, with a weighted kappa of 0.80 (95% CI 0.72–0.81). In the evaluation of the effects of time per bed acquisition on semi-quantitative measurements, we found that the only time point significantly different from the standard time were 30 and 60 s (both with P < 0.001). The effects of dose and BMI were not statistically significant (P = 0.195 and 0.098, respectively). There was a significant positive effect of time on SNR (P < 0.001), as well as a significant negative effect of weight (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that despite significant delays from injection to imaging (due to comparison with standard PET/CT) compared to standard clinical operations and even in a population with average BMI > 25, images can be acquired as fast as 90 s/bed using the SiPM PET/CT and still result in very good image quality (average score > 4).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5904089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59040892018-04-27 Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality Sonni, Ida Baratto, Lucia Park, Sonya Hatami, Negin Srinivas, Shyam Davidzon, Guido Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam Iagaru, Andrei EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: A newly introduced PET/CT scanner (Discovery Meaningful Insights—DMI, GE Healthcare) includes the silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) with time-of-flight (TOF) technology first used in the GE SIGNA PET/MRI. In this study, we investigated the impact of various acquisition times on image quality using this SiPM-based PET/CT. METHODS: We reviewed data from 58 participants with cancer who were scanned using the DMI PET/CT scanner. The administered dosages ranged 295.3–429.9 MBq (mean ± SD 356.3 ± 37.4) and imaging started at 71–142 min (mean ± SD 101.41 ± 17.52) after administration of the radiopharmaceutical. The patients’ BMI ranged 19.79–46.16 (mean ± SD 26.55 ± 5.53). We retrospectively reconstructed the raw TOF data at 30, 60, 90, and 120 s/bed and at the standard image acquisition time per clinical protocol (180 or 210 s/bed depending on BMI). Each reconstruction was reviewed blindly by two nuclear medicine physicians and scored 1–5 (1—poor, 5—excellent quality). The liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was used as a quantitative measure of image quality. RESULTS: The average scores ± SD of the readers were 2.61 ± 0.83, 3.70 ± 0.92, 4.36 ± 0.82, 4.82 ± 0.39, and 4.91 ± 0.91 for the 30, 60, 90, and 120 s/bed and at standard acquisition time, respectively. Inter-reader agreement on image quality assessment was good, with a weighted kappa of 0.80 (95% CI 0.72–0.81). In the evaluation of the effects of time per bed acquisition on semi-quantitative measurements, we found that the only time point significantly different from the standard time were 30 and 60 s (both with P < 0.001). The effects of dose and BMI were not statistically significant (P = 0.195 and 0.098, respectively). There was a significant positive effect of time on SNR (P < 0.001), as well as a significant negative effect of weight (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that despite significant delays from injection to imaging (due to comparison with standard PET/CT) compared to standard clinical operations and even in a population with average BMI > 25, images can be acquired as fast as 90 s/bed using the SiPM PET/CT and still result in very good image quality (average score > 4). Springer International Publishing 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5904089/ /pubmed/29666972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0207-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sonni, Ida
Baratto, Lucia
Park, Sonya
Hatami, Negin
Srinivas, Shyam
Davidzon, Guido
Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam
Iagaru, Andrei
Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality
title Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality
title_full Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality
title_fullStr Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality
title_full_unstemmed Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality
title_short Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality
title_sort initial experience with a sipm-based pet/ct scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29666972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0207-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sonniida initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality
AT barattolucia initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality
AT parksonya initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality
AT hataminegin initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality
AT srinivasshyam initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality
AT davidzonguido initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality
AT gambhirsanjivsam initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality
AT iagaruandrei initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality