Cargando…
Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality
BACKGROUND: A newly introduced PET/CT scanner (Discovery Meaningful Insights—DMI, GE Healthcare) includes the silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) with time-of-flight (TOF) technology first used in the GE SIGNA PET/MRI. In this study, we investigated the impact of various acquisition times on image qualit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29666972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0207-x |
_version_ | 1783315026029838336 |
---|---|
author | Sonni, Ida Baratto, Lucia Park, Sonya Hatami, Negin Srinivas, Shyam Davidzon, Guido Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam Iagaru, Andrei |
author_facet | Sonni, Ida Baratto, Lucia Park, Sonya Hatami, Negin Srinivas, Shyam Davidzon, Guido Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam Iagaru, Andrei |
author_sort | Sonni, Ida |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A newly introduced PET/CT scanner (Discovery Meaningful Insights—DMI, GE Healthcare) includes the silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) with time-of-flight (TOF) technology first used in the GE SIGNA PET/MRI. In this study, we investigated the impact of various acquisition times on image quality using this SiPM-based PET/CT. METHODS: We reviewed data from 58 participants with cancer who were scanned using the DMI PET/CT scanner. The administered dosages ranged 295.3–429.9 MBq (mean ± SD 356.3 ± 37.4) and imaging started at 71–142 min (mean ± SD 101.41 ± 17.52) after administration of the radiopharmaceutical. The patients’ BMI ranged 19.79–46.16 (mean ± SD 26.55 ± 5.53). We retrospectively reconstructed the raw TOF data at 30, 60, 90, and 120 s/bed and at the standard image acquisition time per clinical protocol (180 or 210 s/bed depending on BMI). Each reconstruction was reviewed blindly by two nuclear medicine physicians and scored 1–5 (1—poor, 5—excellent quality). The liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was used as a quantitative measure of image quality. RESULTS: The average scores ± SD of the readers were 2.61 ± 0.83, 3.70 ± 0.92, 4.36 ± 0.82, 4.82 ± 0.39, and 4.91 ± 0.91 for the 30, 60, 90, and 120 s/bed and at standard acquisition time, respectively. Inter-reader agreement on image quality assessment was good, with a weighted kappa of 0.80 (95% CI 0.72–0.81). In the evaluation of the effects of time per bed acquisition on semi-quantitative measurements, we found that the only time point significantly different from the standard time were 30 and 60 s (both with P < 0.001). The effects of dose and BMI were not statistically significant (P = 0.195 and 0.098, respectively). There was a significant positive effect of time on SNR (P < 0.001), as well as a significant negative effect of weight (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that despite significant delays from injection to imaging (due to comparison with standard PET/CT) compared to standard clinical operations and even in a population with average BMI > 25, images can be acquired as fast as 90 s/bed using the SiPM PET/CT and still result in very good image quality (average score > 4). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5904089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59040892018-04-27 Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality Sonni, Ida Baratto, Lucia Park, Sonya Hatami, Negin Srinivas, Shyam Davidzon, Guido Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam Iagaru, Andrei EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: A newly introduced PET/CT scanner (Discovery Meaningful Insights—DMI, GE Healthcare) includes the silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) with time-of-flight (TOF) technology first used in the GE SIGNA PET/MRI. In this study, we investigated the impact of various acquisition times on image quality using this SiPM-based PET/CT. METHODS: We reviewed data from 58 participants with cancer who were scanned using the DMI PET/CT scanner. The administered dosages ranged 295.3–429.9 MBq (mean ± SD 356.3 ± 37.4) and imaging started at 71–142 min (mean ± SD 101.41 ± 17.52) after administration of the radiopharmaceutical. The patients’ BMI ranged 19.79–46.16 (mean ± SD 26.55 ± 5.53). We retrospectively reconstructed the raw TOF data at 30, 60, 90, and 120 s/bed and at the standard image acquisition time per clinical protocol (180 or 210 s/bed depending on BMI). Each reconstruction was reviewed blindly by two nuclear medicine physicians and scored 1–5 (1—poor, 5—excellent quality). The liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was used as a quantitative measure of image quality. RESULTS: The average scores ± SD of the readers were 2.61 ± 0.83, 3.70 ± 0.92, 4.36 ± 0.82, 4.82 ± 0.39, and 4.91 ± 0.91 for the 30, 60, 90, and 120 s/bed and at standard acquisition time, respectively. Inter-reader agreement on image quality assessment was good, with a weighted kappa of 0.80 (95% CI 0.72–0.81). In the evaluation of the effects of time per bed acquisition on semi-quantitative measurements, we found that the only time point significantly different from the standard time were 30 and 60 s (both with P < 0.001). The effects of dose and BMI were not statistically significant (P = 0.195 and 0.098, respectively). There was a significant positive effect of time on SNR (P < 0.001), as well as a significant negative effect of weight (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that despite significant delays from injection to imaging (due to comparison with standard PET/CT) compared to standard clinical operations and even in a population with average BMI > 25, images can be acquired as fast as 90 s/bed using the SiPM PET/CT and still result in very good image quality (average score > 4). Springer International Publishing 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5904089/ /pubmed/29666972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0207-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sonni, Ida Baratto, Lucia Park, Sonya Hatami, Negin Srinivas, Shyam Davidzon, Guido Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam Iagaru, Andrei Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality |
title | Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality |
title_full | Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality |
title_fullStr | Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality |
title_short | Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality |
title_sort | initial experience with a sipm-based pet/ct scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29666972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0207-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonniida initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality AT barattolucia initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality AT parksonya initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality AT hataminegin initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality AT srinivasshyam initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality AT davidzonguido initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality AT gambhirsanjivsam initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality AT iagaruandrei initialexperiencewithasipmbasedpetctscannerinfluenceofacquisitiontimeonimagequality |