Cargando…

Future Time Perspective Impacts Gain-Related but Not Loss-Related Intertemporal Choice

Future time perspective (FTP) modulates individuals’ temporal orientation in selecting their motivations and goals, which widely influences their cognitions and behaviors. However, it remains unclear how FTP exactly affects intertemporal choice. To clarify the effect of FTP on intertemporal choice,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Tian, Tan, Yuxin, Gong, Xianmin, Yin, Shufei, Qiu, Fangshu, Hu, Xue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695989
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00523
_version_ 1783315073510408192
author Li, Tian
Tan, Yuxin
Gong, Xianmin
Yin, Shufei
Qiu, Fangshu
Hu, Xue
author_facet Li, Tian
Tan, Yuxin
Gong, Xianmin
Yin, Shufei
Qiu, Fangshu
Hu, Xue
author_sort Li, Tian
collection PubMed
description Future time perspective (FTP) modulates individuals’ temporal orientation in selecting their motivations and goals, which widely influences their cognitions and behaviors. However, it remains unclear how FTP exactly affects intertemporal choice. To clarify the effect of FTP on intertemporal choice, 90 college students (M(age) = 21.70, SD = 1.23) were randomly assigned to the limited FTP condition (16 males, 29 females) and the open-ended FTP condition (17 males, 28 females). In the limited FTP condition, participants were instructed to imagine their states of being 70 years old, whereas in the open-ended FTP condition, they were instructed to describe their current states. All participants then completed a series of intertemporal choice tasks, in which they chose from gain- and loss-related choices occurring at various time points. Results showed that the participants who received the future-imagining manipulation had more limited FTP compared with those who did not receive the manipulation, which confirmed the validity of the FTP manipulation. A 2 (FTP: limited vs. open-ended) × 2 (type of choice: gain vs. loss) repeated measures ANOVA on discount rate revealed a significant interaction between these two factors. The participants in the limited FTP condition had higher discount rates on gain-related choices but showed no difference on loss-related choices compared with the participants under the open-ended FTP condition. The results suggest that limited FTP could lower individuals’ future orientation (i.e., willingness to delay an outcome) on gain-related, but not on loss-related, intertemporal decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5904284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59042842018-04-25 Future Time Perspective Impacts Gain-Related but Not Loss-Related Intertemporal Choice Li, Tian Tan, Yuxin Gong, Xianmin Yin, Shufei Qiu, Fangshu Hu, Xue Front Psychol Psychology Future time perspective (FTP) modulates individuals’ temporal orientation in selecting their motivations and goals, which widely influences their cognitions and behaviors. However, it remains unclear how FTP exactly affects intertemporal choice. To clarify the effect of FTP on intertemporal choice, 90 college students (M(age) = 21.70, SD = 1.23) were randomly assigned to the limited FTP condition (16 males, 29 females) and the open-ended FTP condition (17 males, 28 females). In the limited FTP condition, participants were instructed to imagine their states of being 70 years old, whereas in the open-ended FTP condition, they were instructed to describe their current states. All participants then completed a series of intertemporal choice tasks, in which they chose from gain- and loss-related choices occurring at various time points. Results showed that the participants who received the future-imagining manipulation had more limited FTP compared with those who did not receive the manipulation, which confirmed the validity of the FTP manipulation. A 2 (FTP: limited vs. open-ended) × 2 (type of choice: gain vs. loss) repeated measures ANOVA on discount rate revealed a significant interaction between these two factors. The participants in the limited FTP condition had higher discount rates on gain-related choices but showed no difference on loss-related choices compared with the participants under the open-ended FTP condition. The results suggest that limited FTP could lower individuals’ future orientation (i.e., willingness to delay an outcome) on gain-related, but not on loss-related, intertemporal decision-making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5904284/ /pubmed/29695989 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00523 Text en Copyright © 2018 Li, Tan, Gong, Yin, Qiu and Hu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Li, Tian
Tan, Yuxin
Gong, Xianmin
Yin, Shufei
Qiu, Fangshu
Hu, Xue
Future Time Perspective Impacts Gain-Related but Not Loss-Related Intertemporal Choice
title Future Time Perspective Impacts Gain-Related but Not Loss-Related Intertemporal Choice
title_full Future Time Perspective Impacts Gain-Related but Not Loss-Related Intertemporal Choice
title_fullStr Future Time Perspective Impacts Gain-Related but Not Loss-Related Intertemporal Choice
title_full_unstemmed Future Time Perspective Impacts Gain-Related but Not Loss-Related Intertemporal Choice
title_short Future Time Perspective Impacts Gain-Related but Not Loss-Related Intertemporal Choice
title_sort future time perspective impacts gain-related but not loss-related intertemporal choice
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695989
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00523
work_keys_str_mv AT litian futuretimeperspectiveimpactsgainrelatedbutnotlossrelatedintertemporalchoice
AT tanyuxin futuretimeperspectiveimpactsgainrelatedbutnotlossrelatedintertemporalchoice
AT gongxianmin futuretimeperspectiveimpactsgainrelatedbutnotlossrelatedintertemporalchoice
AT yinshufei futuretimeperspectiveimpactsgainrelatedbutnotlossrelatedintertemporalchoice
AT qiufangshu futuretimeperspectiveimpactsgainrelatedbutnotlossrelatedintertemporalchoice
AT huxue futuretimeperspectiveimpactsgainrelatedbutnotlossrelatedintertemporalchoice