Cargando…

Behavior of mandibular canines as abutment teeth and indirect retainers in Kennedy class II Removable Partial Denture Prosthesis

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the behavior of mandibular canines acting as abutment teeth and indirect retainers of a Kennedy class II according to different designs: lingual rest and lingual rest associated with a reciprocal arm. MATERIALS & METHODS: A resin cast with two s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camacho, Marisol C., Gallardo, Yolanda R., Stegun, Roberto Ch., Costa, Bruno, Sesma, Newton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29687083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00575
_version_ 1783315090864340992
author Camacho, Marisol C.
Gallardo, Yolanda R.
Stegun, Roberto Ch.
Costa, Bruno
Sesma, Newton
author_facet Camacho, Marisol C.
Gallardo, Yolanda R.
Stegun, Roberto Ch.
Costa, Bruno
Sesma, Newton
author_sort Camacho, Marisol C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the behavior of mandibular canines acting as abutment teeth and indirect retainers of a Kennedy class II according to different designs: lingual rest and lingual rest associated with a reciprocal arm. MATERIALS & METHODS: A resin cast with two simulated canine teeth was made in Ni-Cr alloy, representing a Kennedy class II mandibular arch. With the objective of simulating the resilience of the periodontal ligament, a polyurethane layer was added at the canine tooth's root. A metallic framework of Co-Cr alloy was fabricated with a T bar clasp and a lingual rest associated with a reciprocal arm. To obtain the second framework, the reciprocal arm was removed using a tungsten bur. Each framework was submitted to tensile force using a VersaTest machine. The magnitude and direction of canine movement during removal of the framework was measured using two dial gauges (mm). The axial tensile force required to remove the experimental framework (N) was also evaluated. The data were compared using the paired t-test with 95% confidence intervals. Differences were considered significant at P < .05. RESULTS: The mean retentive force of the modified design framework with the reciprocal arm was significantly higher (P < .0001) than that of the framework with the lingual rest. The abutment teeth showed movement in the lingual and mesial directions, and this movement was less when associated with the reciprocal arm design. CONCLUSION: The reciprocal arm in association with a lingual rest in the framework decreased the movement of the abutment teeth when analyzed in the bucco-lingual and mesio-distal directions and contributed to increased retention by friction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5904390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59043902018-04-23 Behavior of mandibular canines as abutment teeth and indirect retainers in Kennedy class II Removable Partial Denture Prosthesis Camacho, Marisol C. Gallardo, Yolanda R. Stegun, Roberto Ch. Costa, Bruno Sesma, Newton Heliyon Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the behavior of mandibular canines acting as abutment teeth and indirect retainers of a Kennedy class II according to different designs: lingual rest and lingual rest associated with a reciprocal arm. MATERIALS & METHODS: A resin cast with two simulated canine teeth was made in Ni-Cr alloy, representing a Kennedy class II mandibular arch. With the objective of simulating the resilience of the periodontal ligament, a polyurethane layer was added at the canine tooth's root. A metallic framework of Co-Cr alloy was fabricated with a T bar clasp and a lingual rest associated with a reciprocal arm. To obtain the second framework, the reciprocal arm was removed using a tungsten bur. Each framework was submitted to tensile force using a VersaTest machine. The magnitude and direction of canine movement during removal of the framework was measured using two dial gauges (mm). The axial tensile force required to remove the experimental framework (N) was also evaluated. The data were compared using the paired t-test with 95% confidence intervals. Differences were considered significant at P < .05. RESULTS: The mean retentive force of the modified design framework with the reciprocal arm was significantly higher (P < .0001) than that of the framework with the lingual rest. The abutment teeth showed movement in the lingual and mesial directions, and this movement was less when associated with the reciprocal arm design. CONCLUSION: The reciprocal arm in association with a lingual rest in the framework decreased the movement of the abutment teeth when analyzed in the bucco-lingual and mesio-distal directions and contributed to increased retention by friction. Elsevier 2018-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5904390/ /pubmed/29687083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00575 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Camacho, Marisol C.
Gallardo, Yolanda R.
Stegun, Roberto Ch.
Costa, Bruno
Sesma, Newton
Behavior of mandibular canines as abutment teeth and indirect retainers in Kennedy class II Removable Partial Denture Prosthesis
title Behavior of mandibular canines as abutment teeth and indirect retainers in Kennedy class II Removable Partial Denture Prosthesis
title_full Behavior of mandibular canines as abutment teeth and indirect retainers in Kennedy class II Removable Partial Denture Prosthesis
title_fullStr Behavior of mandibular canines as abutment teeth and indirect retainers in Kennedy class II Removable Partial Denture Prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Behavior of mandibular canines as abutment teeth and indirect retainers in Kennedy class II Removable Partial Denture Prosthesis
title_short Behavior of mandibular canines as abutment teeth and indirect retainers in Kennedy class II Removable Partial Denture Prosthesis
title_sort behavior of mandibular canines as abutment teeth and indirect retainers in kennedy class ii removable partial denture prosthesis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29687083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00575
work_keys_str_mv AT camachomarisolc behaviorofmandibularcaninesasabutmentteethandindirectretainersinkennedyclassiiremovablepartialdentureprosthesis
AT gallardoyolandar behaviorofmandibularcaninesasabutmentteethandindirectretainersinkennedyclassiiremovablepartialdentureprosthesis
AT stegunrobertoch behaviorofmandibularcaninesasabutmentteethandindirectretainersinkennedyclassiiremovablepartialdentureprosthesis
AT costabruno behaviorofmandibularcaninesasabutmentteethandindirectretainersinkennedyclassiiremovablepartialdentureprosthesis
AT sesmanewton behaviorofmandibularcaninesasabutmentteethandindirectretainersinkennedyclassiiremovablepartialdentureprosthesis