Cargando…

Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma

Background: A 2017 study reported that “Plant miRNAs found in human circulating system provide evidences of cross kingdom RNAi”. Analysis of two human blood plasma sequencing datasets was said to provide evidence for uptake of plant miRNAs into human plasma. The results were also purportedly inconsi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Witwer, Kenneth W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744036
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14060.1
_version_ 1783315135750733824
author Witwer, Kenneth W.
author_facet Witwer, Kenneth W.
author_sort Witwer, Kenneth W.
collection PubMed
description Background: A 2017 study reported that “Plant miRNAs found in human circulating system provide evidences of cross kingdom RNAi”. Analysis of two human blood plasma sequencing datasets was said to provide evidence for uptake of plant miRNAs into human plasma. The results were also purportedly inconsistent with contamination. Methods: Sequences from public datasets and miRNA databases were compared with results downloaded from the website of the reporting journal. Results: Only one putative plant miRNA (“peu-MIR2910) mapped consistently above background, and this sequence is found with 100% identity in a human rRNA. Several other rarer but consistently mapped putative plant miRNAs also have 100% or near 100% matches to human transcripts or genomic sequences, and some do not appear to map to plant genomes at all. Conclusions: Reanalysis of public data suggests that dietary plant xenomiR uptake is not supported, but instead confirms previous findings that detection of rare plant miRNAs in mammalian sequencing datasets is artifactual. Some putative plant miRNAs, including MIR2910 and MIR2911, may represent human sequence contamination or other artifacts in plant studies, emphasizing the need for rigorous controls and data filtering strategies when assessing possible xenomiRNAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5904727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59047272018-05-08 Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma Witwer, Kenneth W. F1000Res Research Article Background: A 2017 study reported that “Plant miRNAs found in human circulating system provide evidences of cross kingdom RNAi”. Analysis of two human blood plasma sequencing datasets was said to provide evidence for uptake of plant miRNAs into human plasma. The results were also purportedly inconsistent with contamination. Methods: Sequences from public datasets and miRNA databases were compared with results downloaded from the website of the reporting journal. Results: Only one putative plant miRNA (“peu-MIR2910) mapped consistently above background, and this sequence is found with 100% identity in a human rRNA. Several other rarer but consistently mapped putative plant miRNAs also have 100% or near 100% matches to human transcripts or genomic sequences, and some do not appear to map to plant genomes at all. Conclusions: Reanalysis of public data suggests that dietary plant xenomiR uptake is not supported, but instead confirms previous findings that detection of rare plant miRNAs in mammalian sequencing datasets is artifactual. Some putative plant miRNAs, including MIR2910 and MIR2911, may represent human sequence contamination or other artifacts in plant studies, emphasizing the need for rigorous controls and data filtering strategies when assessing possible xenomiRNAs. F1000 Research Limited 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5904727/ /pubmed/29744036 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14060.1 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Witwer KW http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Witwer, Kenneth W.
Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma
title Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma
title_full Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma
title_fullStr Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma
title_full_unstemmed Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma
title_short Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma
title_sort alternative mirnas? human sequences misidentified as plant mirnas in plant studies and in human plasma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744036
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14060.1
work_keys_str_mv AT witwerkennethw alternativemirnashumansequencesmisidentifiedasplantmirnasinplantstudiesandinhumanplasma