Cargando…
Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma
Background: A 2017 study reported that “Plant miRNAs found in human circulating system provide evidences of cross kingdom RNAi”. Analysis of two human blood plasma sequencing datasets was said to provide evidence for uptake of plant miRNAs into human plasma. The results were also purportedly inconsi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744036 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14060.1 |
_version_ | 1783315135750733824 |
---|---|
author | Witwer, Kenneth W. |
author_facet | Witwer, Kenneth W. |
author_sort | Witwer, Kenneth W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: A 2017 study reported that “Plant miRNAs found in human circulating system provide evidences of cross kingdom RNAi”. Analysis of two human blood plasma sequencing datasets was said to provide evidence for uptake of plant miRNAs into human plasma. The results were also purportedly inconsistent with contamination. Methods: Sequences from public datasets and miRNA databases were compared with results downloaded from the website of the reporting journal. Results: Only one putative plant miRNA (“peu-MIR2910) mapped consistently above background, and this sequence is found with 100% identity in a human rRNA. Several other rarer but consistently mapped putative plant miRNAs also have 100% or near 100% matches to human transcripts or genomic sequences, and some do not appear to map to plant genomes at all. Conclusions: Reanalysis of public data suggests that dietary plant xenomiR uptake is not supported, but instead confirms previous findings that detection of rare plant miRNAs in mammalian sequencing datasets is artifactual. Some putative plant miRNAs, including MIR2910 and MIR2911, may represent human sequence contamination or other artifacts in plant studies, emphasizing the need for rigorous controls and data filtering strategies when assessing possible xenomiRNAs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5904727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59047272018-05-08 Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma Witwer, Kenneth W. F1000Res Research Article Background: A 2017 study reported that “Plant miRNAs found in human circulating system provide evidences of cross kingdom RNAi”. Analysis of two human blood plasma sequencing datasets was said to provide evidence for uptake of plant miRNAs into human plasma. The results were also purportedly inconsistent with contamination. Methods: Sequences from public datasets and miRNA databases were compared with results downloaded from the website of the reporting journal. Results: Only one putative plant miRNA (“peu-MIR2910) mapped consistently above background, and this sequence is found with 100% identity in a human rRNA. Several other rarer but consistently mapped putative plant miRNAs also have 100% or near 100% matches to human transcripts or genomic sequences, and some do not appear to map to plant genomes at all. Conclusions: Reanalysis of public data suggests that dietary plant xenomiR uptake is not supported, but instead confirms previous findings that detection of rare plant miRNAs in mammalian sequencing datasets is artifactual. Some putative plant miRNAs, including MIR2910 and MIR2911, may represent human sequence contamination or other artifacts in plant studies, emphasizing the need for rigorous controls and data filtering strategies when assessing possible xenomiRNAs. F1000 Research Limited 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5904727/ /pubmed/29744036 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14060.1 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Witwer KW http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Witwer, Kenneth W. Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma |
title | Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma |
title_full | Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma |
title_fullStr | Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma |
title_short | Alternative miRNAs? Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma |
title_sort | alternative mirnas? human sequences misidentified as plant mirnas in plant studies and in human plasma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744036 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14060.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT witwerkennethw alternativemirnashumansequencesmisidentifiedasplantmirnasinplantstudiesandinhumanplasma |