Cargando…

Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits

The importance of an accurate measurement of sagittal jaw relationship, that is, skeletal class, is critical to orthodontic treatment planning. The ANB angle, β angle, and MMBP-Wits are among indices of sagittal jaw relationship. All of these indices are subjected to geometrical distortion, especial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perinetti, Giuseppe, Ceschi, Michele, Scalia, Alessandro, Contardo, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8740731
_version_ 1783315146541629440
author Perinetti, Giuseppe
Ceschi, Michele
Scalia, Alessandro
Contardo, Luca
author_facet Perinetti, Giuseppe
Ceschi, Michele
Scalia, Alessandro
Contardo, Luca
author_sort Perinetti, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description The importance of an accurate measurement of sagittal jaw relationship, that is, skeletal class, is critical to orthodontic treatment planning. The ANB angle, β angle, and MMBP-Wits are among indices of sagittal jaw relationship. All of these indices are subjected to geometrical distortion, especially from facial divergence, making the use of floating (individualized) norms necessary. This study thus provides floating norms for the ANB angle and for the first time for the β angle and MMBP-Wits. Lateral head films were obtained from 119 subjects (74 females and 45 males; mean age, 11.2 ± 1.5 years; range, 8.2–14.0 years) with well-balanced and pleasant profile and a near-ideal occlusion. Multiple regression models were employed to quantify the association of the ANB angle, β angle, and MMBP-Wits each with other four angular cephalometric parameters including SNA, SN/PP, SN/MP, and NSBa angles. The β angle and MMBP-Wits were associated with the SNA and SN/MP angles; the ANB angle was associated with all the four other cephalometric variables. Floating norms for the β angle and MMBP-Wits (but not ANB angle) have been cross-tabulated according to the SNA angle (from 74° to 90°) and SN/MP angle (from 24° to 44°). While the ANB angle is subjected to significantly more geometrical distortion as compared to the β angle and MMBP-Wits, floating norms may be used to individualize the reference values for both the β angle and MMBP-Wits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5904795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59047952018-05-30 Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits Perinetti, Giuseppe Ceschi, Michele Scalia, Alessandro Contardo, Luca Biomed Res Int Research Article The importance of an accurate measurement of sagittal jaw relationship, that is, skeletal class, is critical to orthodontic treatment planning. The ANB angle, β angle, and MMBP-Wits are among indices of sagittal jaw relationship. All of these indices are subjected to geometrical distortion, especially from facial divergence, making the use of floating (individualized) norms necessary. This study thus provides floating norms for the ANB angle and for the first time for the β angle and MMBP-Wits. Lateral head films were obtained from 119 subjects (74 females and 45 males; mean age, 11.2 ± 1.5 years; range, 8.2–14.0 years) with well-balanced and pleasant profile and a near-ideal occlusion. Multiple regression models were employed to quantify the association of the ANB angle, β angle, and MMBP-Wits each with other four angular cephalometric parameters including SNA, SN/PP, SN/MP, and NSBa angles. The β angle and MMBP-Wits were associated with the SNA and SN/MP angles; the ANB angle was associated with all the four other cephalometric variables. Floating norms for the β angle and MMBP-Wits (but not ANB angle) have been cross-tabulated according to the SNA angle (from 74° to 90°) and SN/MP angle (from 24° to 44°). While the ANB angle is subjected to significantly more geometrical distortion as compared to the β angle and MMBP-Wits, floating norms may be used to individualize the reference values for both the β angle and MMBP-Wits. Hindawi 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5904795/ /pubmed/29850584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8740731 Text en Copyright © 2018 Giuseppe Perinetti et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Perinetti, Giuseppe
Ceschi, Michele
Scalia, Alessandro
Contardo, Luca
Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits
title Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits
title_full Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits
title_fullStr Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits
title_full_unstemmed Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits
title_short Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits
title_sort cephalometric floating norms for the β angle and mmbp-wits
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8740731
work_keys_str_mv AT perinettigiuseppe cephalometricfloatingnormsforthebangleandmmbpwits
AT ceschimichele cephalometricfloatingnormsforthebangleandmmbpwits
AT scaliaalessandro cephalometricfloatingnormsforthebangleandmmbpwits
AT contardoluca cephalometricfloatingnormsforthebangleandmmbpwits