Cargando…
Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits
The importance of an accurate measurement of sagittal jaw relationship, that is, skeletal class, is critical to orthodontic treatment planning. The ANB angle, β angle, and MMBP-Wits are among indices of sagittal jaw relationship. All of these indices are subjected to geometrical distortion, especial...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8740731 |
_version_ | 1783315146541629440 |
---|---|
author | Perinetti, Giuseppe Ceschi, Michele Scalia, Alessandro Contardo, Luca |
author_facet | Perinetti, Giuseppe Ceschi, Michele Scalia, Alessandro Contardo, Luca |
author_sort | Perinetti, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | The importance of an accurate measurement of sagittal jaw relationship, that is, skeletal class, is critical to orthodontic treatment planning. The ANB angle, β angle, and MMBP-Wits are among indices of sagittal jaw relationship. All of these indices are subjected to geometrical distortion, especially from facial divergence, making the use of floating (individualized) norms necessary. This study thus provides floating norms for the ANB angle and for the first time for the β angle and MMBP-Wits. Lateral head films were obtained from 119 subjects (74 females and 45 males; mean age, 11.2 ± 1.5 years; range, 8.2–14.0 years) with well-balanced and pleasant profile and a near-ideal occlusion. Multiple regression models were employed to quantify the association of the ANB angle, β angle, and MMBP-Wits each with other four angular cephalometric parameters including SNA, SN/PP, SN/MP, and NSBa angles. The β angle and MMBP-Wits were associated with the SNA and SN/MP angles; the ANB angle was associated with all the four other cephalometric variables. Floating norms for the β angle and MMBP-Wits (but not ANB angle) have been cross-tabulated according to the SNA angle (from 74° to 90°) and SN/MP angle (from 24° to 44°). While the ANB angle is subjected to significantly more geometrical distortion as compared to the β angle and MMBP-Wits, floating norms may be used to individualize the reference values for both the β angle and MMBP-Wits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5904795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59047952018-05-30 Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits Perinetti, Giuseppe Ceschi, Michele Scalia, Alessandro Contardo, Luca Biomed Res Int Research Article The importance of an accurate measurement of sagittal jaw relationship, that is, skeletal class, is critical to orthodontic treatment planning. The ANB angle, β angle, and MMBP-Wits are among indices of sagittal jaw relationship. All of these indices are subjected to geometrical distortion, especially from facial divergence, making the use of floating (individualized) norms necessary. This study thus provides floating norms for the ANB angle and for the first time for the β angle and MMBP-Wits. Lateral head films were obtained from 119 subjects (74 females and 45 males; mean age, 11.2 ± 1.5 years; range, 8.2–14.0 years) with well-balanced and pleasant profile and a near-ideal occlusion. Multiple regression models were employed to quantify the association of the ANB angle, β angle, and MMBP-Wits each with other four angular cephalometric parameters including SNA, SN/PP, SN/MP, and NSBa angles. The β angle and MMBP-Wits were associated with the SNA and SN/MP angles; the ANB angle was associated with all the four other cephalometric variables. Floating norms for the β angle and MMBP-Wits (but not ANB angle) have been cross-tabulated according to the SNA angle (from 74° to 90°) and SN/MP angle (from 24° to 44°). While the ANB angle is subjected to significantly more geometrical distortion as compared to the β angle and MMBP-Wits, floating norms may be used to individualize the reference values for both the β angle and MMBP-Wits. Hindawi 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5904795/ /pubmed/29850584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8740731 Text en Copyright © 2018 Giuseppe Perinetti et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Perinetti, Giuseppe Ceschi, Michele Scalia, Alessandro Contardo, Luca Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits |
title | Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits |
title_full | Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits |
title_fullStr | Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits |
title_full_unstemmed | Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits |
title_short | Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits |
title_sort | cephalometric floating norms for the β angle and mmbp-wits |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5904795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8740731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perinettigiuseppe cephalometricfloatingnormsforthebangleandmmbpwits AT ceschimichele cephalometricfloatingnormsforthebangleandmmbpwits AT scaliaalessandro cephalometricfloatingnormsforthebangleandmmbpwits AT contardoluca cephalometricfloatingnormsforthebangleandmmbpwits |