Cargando…
Immediate implant replacement with DIEP flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction
BACKGROUND: Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy has shown a significant improvement in patients’ quality of life, making the procedure steadily more popular year after year. However, this technique has a high morbidity rate, including skin necrosis and implant...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29665804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1387-5 |
_version_ | 1783315195182972928 |
---|---|
author | Marquez, Miguel De La Parra Fernandez-Riera, Ricardo Cardona, Hector Vela Flores, Jesus María Rangel |
author_facet | Marquez, Miguel De La Parra Fernandez-Riera, Ricardo Cardona, Hector Vela Flores, Jesus María Rangel |
author_sort | Marquez, Miguel De La Parra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy has shown a significant improvement in patients’ quality of life, making the procedure steadily more popular year after year. However, this technique has a high morbidity rate, including skin necrosis and implant exposure. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively held database for autologous breast reconstruction in our institution of the last 5 years found eight cases with exposed implants after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. A single-stage procedure consisting on implant removal and immediate replacement with a deepithelialized DIEP flap was performed in all cases (10 DIEP flaps). RESULTS: All flaps were successful. Patients’ mean age was 45 years old. Three patients developed seroma (5, 7, and 14 days after surgery, respectively). No infections were detected in up to 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction is considered oncologically safe. However, it has a high rate of complications that could require implant removal. Immediate free flap reconstruction is a feasible and safe option to replace the missing volume with low risk of complications that result in a soft and natural-shaped breast. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5905049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59050492018-04-24 Immediate implant replacement with DIEP flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction Marquez, Miguel De La Parra Fernandez-Riera, Ricardo Cardona, Hector Vela Flores, Jesus María Rangel World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Implant-based immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy has shown a significant improvement in patients’ quality of life, making the procedure steadily more popular year after year. However, this technique has a high morbidity rate, including skin necrosis and implant exposure. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively held database for autologous breast reconstruction in our institution of the last 5 years found eight cases with exposed implants after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. A single-stage procedure consisting on implant removal and immediate replacement with a deepithelialized DIEP flap was performed in all cases (10 DIEP flaps). RESULTS: All flaps were successful. Patients’ mean age was 45 years old. Three patients developed seroma (5, 7, and 14 days after surgery, respectively). No infections were detected in up to 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction is considered oncologically safe. However, it has a high rate of complications that could require implant removal. Immediate free flap reconstruction is a feasible and safe option to replace the missing volume with low risk of complications that result in a soft and natural-shaped breast. BioMed Central 2018-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5905049/ /pubmed/29665804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1387-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Marquez, Miguel De La Parra Fernandez-Riera, Ricardo Cardona, Hector Vela Flores, Jesus María Rangel Immediate implant replacement with DIEP flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction |
title | Immediate implant replacement with DIEP flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction |
title_full | Immediate implant replacement with DIEP flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Immediate implant replacement with DIEP flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Immediate implant replacement with DIEP flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction |
title_short | Immediate implant replacement with DIEP flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction |
title_sort | immediate implant replacement with diep flap: a single-stage salvage option in failed implant-based breast reconstruction |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29665804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1387-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marquezmigueldelaparra immediateimplantreplacementwithdiepflapasinglestagesalvageoptioninfailedimplantbasedbreastreconstruction AT fernandezrieraricardo immediateimplantreplacementwithdiepflapasinglestagesalvageoptioninfailedimplantbasedbreastreconstruction AT cardonahectorvela immediateimplantreplacementwithdiepflapasinglestagesalvageoptioninfailedimplantbasedbreastreconstruction AT floresjesusmariarangel immediateimplantreplacementwithdiepflapasinglestagesalvageoptioninfailedimplantbasedbreastreconstruction |