Cargando…

Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of patient positioning on the volume of organs at risk (OARs) in or near the planning target volume (PTV) and the dose distribution in adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy. METHODS: Seventeen patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sawayanagi, Subaru, Yamashita, Hideomi, Ogita, Mami, Kiritoshi, Tomoki, Nakamoto, Takahiro, Abe, Osamu, Nakagawa, Keiichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29665832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1023-0
_version_ 1783315212544245760
author Sawayanagi, Subaru
Yamashita, Hideomi
Ogita, Mami
Kiritoshi, Tomoki
Nakamoto, Takahiro
Abe, Osamu
Nakagawa, Keiichi
author_facet Sawayanagi, Subaru
Yamashita, Hideomi
Ogita, Mami
Kiritoshi, Tomoki
Nakamoto, Takahiro
Abe, Osamu
Nakagawa, Keiichi
author_sort Sawayanagi, Subaru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of patient positioning on the volume of organs at risk (OARs) in or near the planning target volume (PTV) and the dose distribution in adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy. METHODS: Seventeen patients who received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (66 Gy in 33 fractions) as adjuvant or salvage therapy after prostatectomy were evaluated. All patients underwent CT scans in both the prone (on a belly board) and supine positions. The target volumes and OARs were delineated on each CT series. The planning target volume (PTV) was extended in every direction to generate the PTV + 0.5 cm, PTV + 1 cm, PTV + 2 cm, PTV + 3 cm, and PTV + 4 cm values. The volumes of the OARs overlapping with the PTV and the extended target volumes in the prone and supine position were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters in the prone and supine position were compared using the paired t-test. RESULTS: The mean overlapping volumes of the small intestine for each of the PTV values were as follows (prone position vs. supine position [mean ± SD]): PTV, 1.5 ± 5.5 cm(3) vs. 7.9 ± 15.7 cm(3) (P = 0.028); PTV + 0.5 cm, 2.6 ± 8.9 cm(3) vs. 12.1 ± 22.6 cm(3) (P = 0.028); PTV + 1 cm, 3.5 ± 11.4 cm(3) vs. 17.1 ± 29.8 cm(3) (P = 0.028); PTV + 2 cm, 5.6 ± 14.5 cm(3) vs. 26.8 ± 46.9 cm(3) (P = 0.028); and PTV + 3 cm, 9.0 ± 17.4 cm(3) vs. 36.5 ± 63.2 cm(3) (P = 0.019), respectively. Some of the overlapping volumes of the rectum and bladder were significantly smaller in the prone position. On the other hand, when the target volume was extended by ≥2 cm, the overlapping volumes of the femurs were significantly larger in the prone position. V15 of the rectum and mean dose and V65 of the bladder were significantly lower in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that the volumes of the small intestine, rectum, and bladder in or near the PTV decreased when the patient was placed in the prone position on a belly board in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The dose distribution seemed superior in the prone position to the supine position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5905127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59051272018-04-24 Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer Sawayanagi, Subaru Yamashita, Hideomi Ogita, Mami Kiritoshi, Tomoki Nakamoto, Takahiro Abe, Osamu Nakagawa, Keiichi Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of patient positioning on the volume of organs at risk (OARs) in or near the planning target volume (PTV) and the dose distribution in adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy. METHODS: Seventeen patients who received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (66 Gy in 33 fractions) as adjuvant or salvage therapy after prostatectomy were evaluated. All patients underwent CT scans in both the prone (on a belly board) and supine positions. The target volumes and OARs were delineated on each CT series. The planning target volume (PTV) was extended in every direction to generate the PTV + 0.5 cm, PTV + 1 cm, PTV + 2 cm, PTV + 3 cm, and PTV + 4 cm values. The volumes of the OARs overlapping with the PTV and the extended target volumes in the prone and supine position were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters in the prone and supine position were compared using the paired t-test. RESULTS: The mean overlapping volumes of the small intestine for each of the PTV values were as follows (prone position vs. supine position [mean ± SD]): PTV, 1.5 ± 5.5 cm(3) vs. 7.9 ± 15.7 cm(3) (P = 0.028); PTV + 0.5 cm, 2.6 ± 8.9 cm(3) vs. 12.1 ± 22.6 cm(3) (P = 0.028); PTV + 1 cm, 3.5 ± 11.4 cm(3) vs. 17.1 ± 29.8 cm(3) (P = 0.028); PTV + 2 cm, 5.6 ± 14.5 cm(3) vs. 26.8 ± 46.9 cm(3) (P = 0.028); and PTV + 3 cm, 9.0 ± 17.4 cm(3) vs. 36.5 ± 63.2 cm(3) (P = 0.019), respectively. Some of the overlapping volumes of the rectum and bladder were significantly smaller in the prone position. On the other hand, when the target volume was extended by ≥2 cm, the overlapping volumes of the femurs were significantly larger in the prone position. V15 of the rectum and mean dose and V65 of the bladder were significantly lower in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that the volumes of the small intestine, rectum, and bladder in or near the PTV decreased when the patient was placed in the prone position on a belly board in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The dose distribution seemed superior in the prone position to the supine position. BioMed Central 2018-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5905127/ /pubmed/29665832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1023-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sawayanagi, Subaru
Yamashita, Hideomi
Ogita, Mami
Kiritoshi, Tomoki
Nakamoto, Takahiro
Abe, Osamu
Nakagawa, Keiichi
Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title_full Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title_fullStr Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title_short Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer
title_sort volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29665832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1023-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sawayanagisubaru volumetricanddosimetriccomparisonoforgansatriskbetweentheproneandsupinepositionsinpostoperativeradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT yamashitahideomi volumetricanddosimetriccomparisonoforgansatriskbetweentheproneandsupinepositionsinpostoperativeradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT ogitamami volumetricanddosimetriccomparisonoforgansatriskbetweentheproneandsupinepositionsinpostoperativeradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT kiritoshitomoki volumetricanddosimetriccomparisonoforgansatriskbetweentheproneandsupinepositionsinpostoperativeradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT nakamototakahiro volumetricanddosimetriccomparisonoforgansatriskbetweentheproneandsupinepositionsinpostoperativeradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT abeosamu volumetricanddosimetriccomparisonoforgansatriskbetweentheproneandsupinepositionsinpostoperativeradiotherapyforprostatecancer
AT nakagawakeiichi volumetricanddosimetriccomparisonoforgansatriskbetweentheproneandsupinepositionsinpostoperativeradiotherapyforprostatecancer