Cargando…

OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES: Erlotinib, the first generation of epidermoid growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has been recommended as an essential treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation. Although it has improved progression-free survival (PFS), over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Feng, Zheng, Hanrui, Zhang, Pengfei, Hutton, David, Li, Qiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020128
_version_ 1783315310721368064
author Wen, Feng
Zheng, Hanrui
Zhang, Pengfei
Hutton, David
Li, Qiu
author_facet Wen, Feng
Zheng, Hanrui
Zhang, Pengfei
Hutton, David
Li, Qiu
author_sort Wen, Feng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Erlotinib, the first generation of epidermoid growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has been recommended as an essential treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation. Although it has improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) was limited and erlotinib can be expensive. This cost-effectiveness analysis compares erlotinib monotherapy with gemcitabine-included doublet chemotherapy. SETTING: First-line treatment of Asian patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutation. METHODS: A Markov model was created based on the results of the ENSURE (NCT01342965) and OPTIMAL (CTONG-0802) trials which evaluated erlotinib and chemotherapy. The model simulates cancer progression and all causes of death. All medical costs were calculated from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes are costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: The combined PFS was 11.81 months and 5.1 months for erlotinib and chemotherapy, respectively, while the OS was reversed at 24.68 months for erlotinib and 26.16 months for chemotherapy. The chemotherapy arm gained 0.13 QALYs compared with erlotinib monotherapy (1.17 QALYs vs 1.04 QALYs), while erlotinib had lower costs ($55 230 vs $77 669), resulting in an ICER of $174 808 per QALY for the chemotherapy arm, which exceeds three times the Chinese GDP per capita. The most influential factors were the health utility of PFS, the cost of erlotinib and the health utility of progressed disease. CONCLUSION: Erlotinib monotherapy may be acceptable as a cost-effective first-line treatment for NSCLC compared with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The results were robust to changes in assumptions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01342965 and CTONG-0802.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5905764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59057642018-04-20 OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer Wen, Feng Zheng, Hanrui Zhang, Pengfei Hutton, David Li, Qiu BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: Erlotinib, the first generation of epidermoid growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has been recommended as an essential treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation. Although it has improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) was limited and erlotinib can be expensive. This cost-effectiveness analysis compares erlotinib monotherapy with gemcitabine-included doublet chemotherapy. SETTING: First-line treatment of Asian patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutation. METHODS: A Markov model was created based on the results of the ENSURE (NCT01342965) and OPTIMAL (CTONG-0802) trials which evaluated erlotinib and chemotherapy. The model simulates cancer progression and all causes of death. All medical costs were calculated from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes are costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: The combined PFS was 11.81 months and 5.1 months for erlotinib and chemotherapy, respectively, while the OS was reversed at 24.68 months for erlotinib and 26.16 months for chemotherapy. The chemotherapy arm gained 0.13 QALYs compared with erlotinib monotherapy (1.17 QALYs vs 1.04 QALYs), while erlotinib had lower costs ($55 230 vs $77 669), resulting in an ICER of $174 808 per QALY for the chemotherapy arm, which exceeds three times the Chinese GDP per capita. The most influential factors were the health utility of PFS, the cost of erlotinib and the health utility of progressed disease. CONCLUSION: Erlotinib monotherapy may be acceptable as a cost-effective first-line treatment for NSCLC compared with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The results were robust to changes in assumptions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01342965 and CTONG-0802. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5905764/ /pubmed/29654023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020128 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Wen, Feng
Zheng, Hanrui
Zhang, Pengfei
Hutton, David
Li, Qiu
OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer
title OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer
title_full OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer
title_fullStr OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer
title_short OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer
title_sort optimal and ensure trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020128
work_keys_str_mv AT wenfeng optimalandensuretrialsbasedcombinedcosteffectivenessanalysisoferlotinibversuschemotherapyforthefirstlinetreatmentofasianpatientswithnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhenghanrui optimalandensuretrialsbasedcombinedcosteffectivenessanalysisoferlotinibversuschemotherapyforthefirstlinetreatmentofasianpatientswithnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangpengfei optimalandensuretrialsbasedcombinedcosteffectivenessanalysisoferlotinibversuschemotherapyforthefirstlinetreatmentofasianpatientswithnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT huttondavid optimalandensuretrialsbasedcombinedcosteffectivenessanalysisoferlotinibversuschemotherapyforthefirstlinetreatmentofasianpatientswithnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT liqiu optimalandensuretrialsbasedcombinedcosteffectivenessanalysisoferlotinibversuschemotherapyforthefirstlinetreatmentofasianpatientswithnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer