Cargando…
BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer
BACKGROUND: Identification of BRCA mutation carriers among patients with breast cancer (BC) involves costs and gains. Testing has been performed according to international guidelines, focusing on family history (FH) of breast and/or ovarian cancer. An alternative is testing all patients with BC empl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000328 |
_version_ | 1783315315456737280 |
---|---|
author | Norum, Jan Grindedal, Eli Marie Heramb, Cecilie Karsrud, Inga Ariansen, Sarah Louise Undlien, Dag Erik Schlichting, Ellen Mæhle, Lovise |
author_facet | Norum, Jan Grindedal, Eli Marie Heramb, Cecilie Karsrud, Inga Ariansen, Sarah Louise Undlien, Dag Erik Schlichting, Ellen Mæhle, Lovise |
author_sort | Norum, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Identification of BRCA mutation carriers among patients with breast cancer (BC) involves costs and gains. Testing has been performed according to international guidelines, focusing on family history (FH) of breast and/or ovarian cancer. An alternative is testing all patients with BC employing sequencing of the BRCA genes and Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification (MLPA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, employing data from Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål (OUH-U) and a decision tree, was done. The societal and the healthcare perspectives were focused and a lifetime perspective employed. The comparators were the traditional FH approach used as standard of care at OUH-U in 2013 and the intervention (testing all patients with BC) performed in 2014 and 2015 at the same hospital. During the latter period, 535 patients with BC were offered BRCA testing with sequencing and MLPA. National 2014 data on mortality rates and costs were implemented, a 3% discount rate used and the costing year was 2015. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated in euros (€) per life-year gained (LYG). RESULTS: The net healthcare cost (healthcare perspective) was €40 503/LYG. Including all resource use (societal perspective), the cost was €5669/LYG. The univariate sensitivity analysis documented the unit cost of the BRCA test and the number of LYGs the prominent parameters affecting the result. Diagnostic BRCA testing of all patients with BC was superior to the FH approach and cost-effective within the frequently used thresholds (healthcare perspective) in Norway (€60 000–€80 000/LYG). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5905828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59058282018-04-20 BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer Norum, Jan Grindedal, Eli Marie Heramb, Cecilie Karsrud, Inga Ariansen, Sarah Louise Undlien, Dag Erik Schlichting, Ellen Mæhle, Lovise ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Identification of BRCA mutation carriers among patients with breast cancer (BC) involves costs and gains. Testing has been performed according to international guidelines, focusing on family history (FH) of breast and/or ovarian cancer. An alternative is testing all patients with BC employing sequencing of the BRCA genes and Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification (MLPA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, employing data from Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål (OUH-U) and a decision tree, was done. The societal and the healthcare perspectives were focused and a lifetime perspective employed. The comparators were the traditional FH approach used as standard of care at OUH-U in 2013 and the intervention (testing all patients with BC) performed in 2014 and 2015 at the same hospital. During the latter period, 535 patients with BC were offered BRCA testing with sequencing and MLPA. National 2014 data on mortality rates and costs were implemented, a 3% discount rate used and the costing year was 2015. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated in euros (€) per life-year gained (LYG). RESULTS: The net healthcare cost (healthcare perspective) was €40 503/LYG. Including all resource use (societal perspective), the cost was €5669/LYG. The univariate sensitivity analysis documented the unit cost of the BRCA test and the number of LYGs the prominent parameters affecting the result. Diagnostic BRCA testing of all patients with BC was superior to the FH approach and cost-effective within the frequently used thresholds (healthcare perspective) in Norway (€60 000–€80 000/LYG). BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5905828/ /pubmed/29682331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000328 Text en © European Society for Medical Oncology (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Norum, Jan Grindedal, Eli Marie Heramb, Cecilie Karsrud, Inga Ariansen, Sarah Louise Undlien, Dag Erik Schlichting, Ellen Mæhle, Lovise BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer |
title |
BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer |
title_full |
BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer |
title_fullStr |
BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer |
title_short |
BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer |
title_sort | brca mutation carrier detection. a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000328 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT norumjan brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer AT grindedalelimarie brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer AT herambcecilie brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer AT karsrudinga brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer AT ariansensarahlouise brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer AT undliendagerik brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer AT schlichtingellen brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer AT mæhlelovise brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer |