Cargando…

BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Identification of BRCA mutation carriers among patients with breast cancer (BC) involves costs and gains. Testing has been performed according to international guidelines, focusing on family history (FH) of breast and/or ovarian cancer. An alternative is testing all patients with BC empl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norum, Jan, Grindedal, Eli Marie, Heramb, Cecilie, Karsrud, Inga, Ariansen, Sarah Louise, Undlien, Dag Erik, Schlichting, Ellen, Mæhle, Lovise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000328
_version_ 1783315315456737280
author Norum, Jan
Grindedal, Eli Marie
Heramb, Cecilie
Karsrud, Inga
Ariansen, Sarah Louise
Undlien, Dag Erik
Schlichting, Ellen
Mæhle, Lovise
author_facet Norum, Jan
Grindedal, Eli Marie
Heramb, Cecilie
Karsrud, Inga
Ariansen, Sarah Louise
Undlien, Dag Erik
Schlichting, Ellen
Mæhle, Lovise
author_sort Norum, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identification of BRCA mutation carriers among patients with breast cancer (BC) involves costs and gains. Testing has been performed according to international guidelines, focusing on family history (FH) of breast and/or ovarian cancer. An alternative is testing all patients with BC employing sequencing of the BRCA genes and Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification (MLPA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, employing data from Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål (OUH-U) and a decision tree, was done. The societal and the healthcare perspectives were focused and a lifetime perspective employed. The comparators were the traditional FH approach used as standard of care at OUH-U in 2013 and the intervention (testing all patients with BC) performed in 2014 and 2015 at the same hospital. During the latter period, 535 patients with BC were offered BRCA testing with sequencing and MLPA. National 2014 data on mortality rates and costs were implemented, a 3% discount rate used and the costing year was 2015. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated in euros (€) per life-year gained (LYG). RESULTS: The net healthcare cost (healthcare perspective) was €40 503/LYG. Including all resource use (societal perspective), the cost was €5669/LYG. The univariate sensitivity analysis documented the unit cost of the BRCA test and the number of LYGs the prominent parameters affecting the result. Diagnostic BRCA testing of all patients with BC was superior to the FH approach and cost-effective within the frequently used thresholds (healthcare perspective) in Norway (€60 000–€80 000/LYG).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5905828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59058282018-04-20 BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer Norum, Jan Grindedal, Eli Marie Heramb, Cecilie Karsrud, Inga Ariansen, Sarah Louise Undlien, Dag Erik Schlichting, Ellen Mæhle, Lovise ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Identification of BRCA mutation carriers among patients with breast cancer (BC) involves costs and gains. Testing has been performed according to international guidelines, focusing on family history (FH) of breast and/or ovarian cancer. An alternative is testing all patients with BC employing sequencing of the BRCA genes and Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification (MLPA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, employing data from Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål (OUH-U) and a decision tree, was done. The societal and the healthcare perspectives were focused and a lifetime perspective employed. The comparators were the traditional FH approach used as standard of care at OUH-U in 2013 and the intervention (testing all patients with BC) performed in 2014 and 2015 at the same hospital. During the latter period, 535 patients with BC were offered BRCA testing with sequencing and MLPA. National 2014 data on mortality rates and costs were implemented, a 3% discount rate used and the costing year was 2015. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated in euros (€) per life-year gained (LYG). RESULTS: The net healthcare cost (healthcare perspective) was €40 503/LYG. Including all resource use (societal perspective), the cost was €5669/LYG. The univariate sensitivity analysis documented the unit cost of the BRCA test and the number of LYGs the prominent parameters affecting the result. Diagnostic BRCA testing of all patients with BC was superior to the FH approach and cost-effective within the frequently used thresholds (healthcare perspective) in Norway (€60 000–€80 000/LYG). BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5905828/ /pubmed/29682331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000328 Text en © European Society for Medical Oncology (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Norum, Jan
Grindedal, Eli Marie
Heramb, Cecilie
Karsrud, Inga
Ariansen, Sarah Louise
Undlien, Dag Erik
Schlichting, Ellen
Mæhle, Lovise
BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer
title BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer
title_full BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer
title_fullStr BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer
title_short BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer
title_sort brca mutation carrier detection. a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000328
work_keys_str_mv AT norumjan brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer
AT grindedalelimarie brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer
AT herambcecilie brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer
AT karsrudinga brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer
AT ariansensarahlouise brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer
AT undliendagerik brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer
AT schlichtingellen brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer
AT mæhlelovise brcamutationcarrierdetectionamodelbasedcosteffectivenessanalysiscomparingthetraditionalfamilyhistoryapproachandthetestingofallpatientswithbreastcancer