Cargando…

Methodological aspects of serosurveillance in resource-poor settings

Animal production is important for the agricultural economy in low-income countries, but is threatened by infectious diseases. Serosurveys are conducted for different reasons such as disease detection, risk factor studies, disease monitoring and establishing disease-free status. Most reports on such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sternberg Lewerin, Susanna, Wolff, Cecilia, Masembe, Charles, Ståhl, Karl, Boqvist, Sofia, Franko, Mikael Andersson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000273
_version_ 1783315317128167424
author Sternberg Lewerin, Susanna
Wolff, Cecilia
Masembe, Charles
Ståhl, Karl
Boqvist, Sofia
Franko, Mikael Andersson
author_facet Sternberg Lewerin, Susanna
Wolff, Cecilia
Masembe, Charles
Ståhl, Karl
Boqvist, Sofia
Franko, Mikael Andersson
author_sort Sternberg Lewerin, Susanna
collection PubMed
description Animal production is important for the agricultural economy in low-income countries, but is threatened by infectious diseases. Serosurveys are conducted for different reasons such as disease detection, risk factor studies, disease monitoring and establishing disease-free status. Most reports on such serosurveys include some discussion about methodological constraints but still, by necessity, rely on serological results for case definition. This study uses a cross-sectional serosurvey for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), Rift Valley fever (RVF) and contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) in cattle in three districts in Western Uganda to illustrate the limitations of this approach, addressing the questions of what flaws can be expected in sampling and diagnostics and how these influence the results. The target was to collect blood samples from 60 cattle herds per district. To reflect the recent infection history of the herd, young animals (two to five years) were prioritised. The farmers were interviewed about management, cattle trade, cattle health and vaccination. Commercial ELISAs were used for serological analyses: for CBPP the IDEXX CBPP Mycoplasma mycoides subspecies mycoides antibody test kit, for RVF the ID Screen Rift Valley Fever competitive ELISA, and for FMD the PrioCHECK FMDV NS. Apparent prevalence, true prevalence and associations with herd characteristics were assessed. The sampling plans could not be entirely fulfilled, nor the number of tests run in the laboratory. There were reactors to all three diseases with an apparent prevalence of approximately 30 per cent for CBPP, 6 per cent for RVF and 7 per cent for FMD. Calculation of true prevalence based on test sensitivity and specificity resulted in a slightly higher prevalence figure for CBPP and lower figures for RVF and FMD. The study illustrates the importance of considering diagnostic test performance when interpreting results from serosurveys, and the challenge of representative sampling and laboratory work in low-income countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5905835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59058352018-04-20 Methodological aspects of serosurveillance in resource-poor settings Sternberg Lewerin, Susanna Wolff, Cecilia Masembe, Charles Ståhl, Karl Boqvist, Sofia Franko, Mikael Andersson Vet Rec Open Cross Sectional Study or Survey Animal production is important for the agricultural economy in low-income countries, but is threatened by infectious diseases. Serosurveys are conducted for different reasons such as disease detection, risk factor studies, disease monitoring and establishing disease-free status. Most reports on such serosurveys include some discussion about methodological constraints but still, by necessity, rely on serological results for case definition. This study uses a cross-sectional serosurvey for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), Rift Valley fever (RVF) and contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) in cattle in three districts in Western Uganda to illustrate the limitations of this approach, addressing the questions of what flaws can be expected in sampling and diagnostics and how these influence the results. The target was to collect blood samples from 60 cattle herds per district. To reflect the recent infection history of the herd, young animals (two to five years) were prioritised. The farmers were interviewed about management, cattle trade, cattle health and vaccination. Commercial ELISAs were used for serological analyses: for CBPP the IDEXX CBPP Mycoplasma mycoides subspecies mycoides antibody test kit, for RVF the ID Screen Rift Valley Fever competitive ELISA, and for FMD the PrioCHECK FMDV NS. Apparent prevalence, true prevalence and associations with herd characteristics were assessed. The sampling plans could not be entirely fulfilled, nor the number of tests run in the laboratory. There were reactors to all three diseases with an apparent prevalence of approximately 30 per cent for CBPP, 6 per cent for RVF and 7 per cent for FMD. Calculation of true prevalence based on test sensitivity and specificity resulted in a slightly higher prevalence figure for CBPP and lower figures for RVF and FMD. The study illustrates the importance of considering diagnostic test performance when interpreting results from serosurveys, and the challenge of representative sampling and laboratory work in low-income countries. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5905835/ /pubmed/29682293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000273 Text en © British Veterinary Association (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Cross Sectional Study or Survey
Sternberg Lewerin, Susanna
Wolff, Cecilia
Masembe, Charles
Ståhl, Karl
Boqvist, Sofia
Franko, Mikael Andersson
Methodological aspects of serosurveillance in resource-poor settings
title Methodological aspects of serosurveillance in resource-poor settings
title_full Methodological aspects of serosurveillance in resource-poor settings
title_fullStr Methodological aspects of serosurveillance in resource-poor settings
title_full_unstemmed Methodological aspects of serosurveillance in resource-poor settings
title_short Methodological aspects of serosurveillance in resource-poor settings
title_sort methodological aspects of serosurveillance in resource-poor settings
topic Cross Sectional Study or Survey
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000273
work_keys_str_mv AT sternberglewerinsusanna methodologicalaspectsofserosurveillanceinresourcepoorsettings
AT wolffcecilia methodologicalaspectsofserosurveillanceinresourcepoorsettings
AT masembecharles methodologicalaspectsofserosurveillanceinresourcepoorsettings
AT stahlkarl methodologicalaspectsofserosurveillanceinresourcepoorsettings
AT boqvistsofia methodologicalaspectsofserosurveillanceinresourcepoorsettings
AT frankomikaelandersson methodologicalaspectsofserosurveillanceinresourcepoorsettings