Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review

IMPORTANCE: For nearly a century, no generic form of insulin has been available in the United States. However, the first biosimilar insulin, Basaglar, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2015, and subsequently Admelog and Lusduna in 2017. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the scientific e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tieu, Carolyn, Lucas, Eleanor J., DePaola, Mindi, Rosman, Lori, Alexander, G. Caleb
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29668697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195012
_version_ 1783315323431157760
author Tieu, Carolyn
Lucas, Eleanor J.
DePaola, Mindi
Rosman, Lori
Alexander, G. Caleb
author_facet Tieu, Carolyn
Lucas, Eleanor J.
DePaola, Mindi
Rosman, Lori
Alexander, G. Caleb
author_sort Tieu, Carolyn
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: For nearly a century, no generic form of insulin has been available in the United States. However, the first biosimilar insulin, Basaglar, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2015, and subsequently Admelog and Lusduna in 2017. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the scientific evidence comparing the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar and reference insulin products. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Latin America and Caribbean Health Sciences, South Asian Database of Controlled Clinical Trials, and IndiaMED from their inception through January 14, 2018. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing safety, clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of any biosimilar insulin with a reference product in adults regardless of sample size and location. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two researchers independently reviewed all titles, abstracts and text; extracted data; and performed quality assessments. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar and reference insulin products RESULTS: Of 6945 articles screened, 11 studies were included in the data synthesis. LY2963016, Basalog, Basalin, and MK-1293 were compared to Lantus while SAR342434 was compared to Humalog. Three trials enrolled healthy volunteers, five enrolled type 1 diabetics, and two enrolled type 2 diabetics. One study enrolled both healthy and type 1 diabetics. Of the eleven studies, six examined pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic parameters and five examined clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. All studies included adverse events. All PK and/or PD studies showed that comparable parameters of biosimilar and reference products were within the pre-specified equivalence margins. Clinical studies suggested similar clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. Adverse events were similar between the groups across all studies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Few published studies have compared biosimilar and reference insulins, though those that did suggest that the biosimilars have comparable safety and clinical efficacy as its reference product.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5905882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59058822018-05-06 Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review Tieu, Carolyn Lucas, Eleanor J. DePaola, Mindi Rosman, Lori Alexander, G. Caleb PLoS One Research Article IMPORTANCE: For nearly a century, no generic form of insulin has been available in the United States. However, the first biosimilar insulin, Basaglar, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2015, and subsequently Admelog and Lusduna in 2017. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the scientific evidence comparing the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar and reference insulin products. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Latin America and Caribbean Health Sciences, South Asian Database of Controlled Clinical Trials, and IndiaMED from their inception through January 14, 2018. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing safety, clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of any biosimilar insulin with a reference product in adults regardless of sample size and location. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two researchers independently reviewed all titles, abstracts and text; extracted data; and performed quality assessments. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar and reference insulin products RESULTS: Of 6945 articles screened, 11 studies were included in the data synthesis. LY2963016, Basalog, Basalin, and MK-1293 were compared to Lantus while SAR342434 was compared to Humalog. Three trials enrolled healthy volunteers, five enrolled type 1 diabetics, and two enrolled type 2 diabetics. One study enrolled both healthy and type 1 diabetics. Of the eleven studies, six examined pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic parameters and five examined clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. All studies included adverse events. All PK and/or PD studies showed that comparable parameters of biosimilar and reference products were within the pre-specified equivalence margins. Clinical studies suggested similar clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. Adverse events were similar between the groups across all studies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Few published studies have compared biosimilar and reference insulins, though those that did suggest that the biosimilars have comparable safety and clinical efficacy as its reference product. Public Library of Science 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5905882/ /pubmed/29668697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195012 Text en © 2018 Tieu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tieu, Carolyn
Lucas, Eleanor J.
DePaola, Mindi
Rosman, Lori
Alexander, G. Caleb
Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review
title Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review
title_full Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review
title_short Efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: A systematic review
title_sort efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulins compared to their reference products: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29668697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195012
work_keys_str_mv AT tieucarolyn efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarinsulinscomparedtotheirreferenceproductsasystematicreview
AT lucaseleanorj efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarinsulinscomparedtotheirreferenceproductsasystematicreview
AT depaolamindi efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarinsulinscomparedtotheirreferenceproductsasystematicreview
AT rosmanlori efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarinsulinscomparedtotheirreferenceproductsasystematicreview
AT alexandergcaleb efficacyandsafetyofbiosimilarinsulinscomparedtotheirreferenceproductsasystematicreview