Cargando…
Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae)
Previous molecular phylogenetic analyses have resolved the Australian bloodwood eucalypt genus Corymbia (~100 species) as either monophyletic or paraphyletic with respect to Angophora (9–10 species). Here we assess relationships of Corymbia and Angophora using a large dataset of chloroplast DNA sequ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29668710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195034 |
_version_ | 1783315326105026560 |
---|---|
author | Schuster, Tanja M. Setaro, Sabrina D. Tibbits, Josquin F. G. Batty, Erin L. Fowler, Rachael M. McLay, Todd G. B. Wilcox, Stephen Ades, Peter K. Bayly, Michael J. |
author_facet | Schuster, Tanja M. Setaro, Sabrina D. Tibbits, Josquin F. G. Batty, Erin L. Fowler, Rachael M. McLay, Todd G. B. Wilcox, Stephen Ades, Peter K. Bayly, Michael J. |
author_sort | Schuster, Tanja M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous molecular phylogenetic analyses have resolved the Australian bloodwood eucalypt genus Corymbia (~100 species) as either monophyletic or paraphyletic with respect to Angophora (9–10 species). Here we assess relationships of Corymbia and Angophora using a large dataset of chloroplast DNA sequences (121,016 base pairs; from 90 accessions representing 55 Corymbia and 8 Angophora species, plus 33 accessions of related genera), skimmed from high throughput sequencing of genomic DNA, and compare results with new analyses of nuclear ITS sequences (119 accessions) from previous studies. Maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses of cpDNA resolve well supported trees with most nodes having >95% bootstrap support. These trees strongly reject monophyly of Corymbia, its two subgenera (Corymbia and Blakella), most taxonomic sections (Abbreviatae, Maculatae, Naviculares, Septentrionales), and several species. ITS trees weakly indicate paraphyly of Corymbia (bootstrap support <50% for maximum likelihood, and 71% for parsimony), but are highly incongruent with the cpDNA analyses, in that they support monophyly of both subgenera and some taxonomic sections of Corymbia. The striking incongruence between cpDNA trees and both morphological taxonomy and ITS trees is attributed largely to chloroplast introgression between taxa, because of geographic sharing of chloroplast clades across taxonomic groups. Such introgression has been widely inferred in studies of the related genus Eucalyptus. This is the first report of its likely prevalence in Corymbia and Angophora, but this is consistent with previous morphological inferences of hybridisation between species. Our findings (based on continent-wide sampling) highlight a need for more focussed studies to assess the extent of hybridisation and introgression in the evolutionary history of these genera, and that critical testing of the classification of Corymbia and Angophora requires additional sequence data from nuclear genomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5905893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59058932018-05-06 Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae) Schuster, Tanja M. Setaro, Sabrina D. Tibbits, Josquin F. G. Batty, Erin L. Fowler, Rachael M. McLay, Todd G. B. Wilcox, Stephen Ades, Peter K. Bayly, Michael J. PLoS One Research Article Previous molecular phylogenetic analyses have resolved the Australian bloodwood eucalypt genus Corymbia (~100 species) as either monophyletic or paraphyletic with respect to Angophora (9–10 species). Here we assess relationships of Corymbia and Angophora using a large dataset of chloroplast DNA sequences (121,016 base pairs; from 90 accessions representing 55 Corymbia and 8 Angophora species, plus 33 accessions of related genera), skimmed from high throughput sequencing of genomic DNA, and compare results with new analyses of nuclear ITS sequences (119 accessions) from previous studies. Maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses of cpDNA resolve well supported trees with most nodes having >95% bootstrap support. These trees strongly reject monophyly of Corymbia, its two subgenera (Corymbia and Blakella), most taxonomic sections (Abbreviatae, Maculatae, Naviculares, Septentrionales), and several species. ITS trees weakly indicate paraphyly of Corymbia (bootstrap support <50% for maximum likelihood, and 71% for parsimony), but are highly incongruent with the cpDNA analyses, in that they support monophyly of both subgenera and some taxonomic sections of Corymbia. The striking incongruence between cpDNA trees and both morphological taxonomy and ITS trees is attributed largely to chloroplast introgression between taxa, because of geographic sharing of chloroplast clades across taxonomic groups. Such introgression has been widely inferred in studies of the related genus Eucalyptus. This is the first report of its likely prevalence in Corymbia and Angophora, but this is consistent with previous morphological inferences of hybridisation between species. Our findings (based on continent-wide sampling) highlight a need for more focussed studies to assess the extent of hybridisation and introgression in the evolutionary history of these genera, and that critical testing of the classification of Corymbia and Angophora requires additional sequence data from nuclear genomes. Public Library of Science 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5905893/ /pubmed/29668710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195034 Text en © 2018 Schuster et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schuster, Tanja M. Setaro, Sabrina D. Tibbits, Josquin F. G. Batty, Erin L. Fowler, Rachael M. McLay, Todd G. B. Wilcox, Stephen Ades, Peter K. Bayly, Michael J. Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae) |
title | Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae) |
title_full | Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae) |
title_fullStr | Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae) |
title_full_unstemmed | Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae) |
title_short | Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae) |
title_sort | chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus corymbia, family myrtaceae) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29668710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schustertanjam chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae AT setarosabrinad chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae AT tibbitsjosquinfg chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae AT battyerinl chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae AT fowlerrachaelm chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae AT mclaytoddgb chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae AT wilcoxstephen chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae AT adespeterk chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae AT baylymichaelj chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae |