Cargando…

Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae)

Previous molecular phylogenetic analyses have resolved the Australian bloodwood eucalypt genus Corymbia (~100 species) as either monophyletic or paraphyletic with respect to Angophora (9–10 species). Here we assess relationships of Corymbia and Angophora using a large dataset of chloroplast DNA sequ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuster, Tanja M., Setaro, Sabrina D., Tibbits, Josquin F. G., Batty, Erin L., Fowler, Rachael M., McLay, Todd G. B., Wilcox, Stephen, Ades, Peter K., Bayly, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29668710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195034
_version_ 1783315326105026560
author Schuster, Tanja M.
Setaro, Sabrina D.
Tibbits, Josquin F. G.
Batty, Erin L.
Fowler, Rachael M.
McLay, Todd G. B.
Wilcox, Stephen
Ades, Peter K.
Bayly, Michael J.
author_facet Schuster, Tanja M.
Setaro, Sabrina D.
Tibbits, Josquin F. G.
Batty, Erin L.
Fowler, Rachael M.
McLay, Todd G. B.
Wilcox, Stephen
Ades, Peter K.
Bayly, Michael J.
author_sort Schuster, Tanja M.
collection PubMed
description Previous molecular phylogenetic analyses have resolved the Australian bloodwood eucalypt genus Corymbia (~100 species) as either monophyletic or paraphyletic with respect to Angophora (9–10 species). Here we assess relationships of Corymbia and Angophora using a large dataset of chloroplast DNA sequences (121,016 base pairs; from 90 accessions representing 55 Corymbia and 8 Angophora species, plus 33 accessions of related genera), skimmed from high throughput sequencing of genomic DNA, and compare results with new analyses of nuclear ITS sequences (119 accessions) from previous studies. Maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses of cpDNA resolve well supported trees with most nodes having >95% bootstrap support. These trees strongly reject monophyly of Corymbia, its two subgenera (Corymbia and Blakella), most taxonomic sections (Abbreviatae, Maculatae, Naviculares, Septentrionales), and several species. ITS trees weakly indicate paraphyly of Corymbia (bootstrap support <50% for maximum likelihood, and 71% for parsimony), but are highly incongruent with the cpDNA analyses, in that they support monophyly of both subgenera and some taxonomic sections of Corymbia. The striking incongruence between cpDNA trees and both morphological taxonomy and ITS trees is attributed largely to chloroplast introgression between taxa, because of geographic sharing of chloroplast clades across taxonomic groups. Such introgression has been widely inferred in studies of the related genus Eucalyptus. This is the first report of its likely prevalence in Corymbia and Angophora, but this is consistent with previous morphological inferences of hybridisation between species. Our findings (based on continent-wide sampling) highlight a need for more focussed studies to assess the extent of hybridisation and introgression in the evolutionary history of these genera, and that critical testing of the classification of Corymbia and Angophora requires additional sequence data from nuclear genomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5905893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59058932018-05-06 Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae) Schuster, Tanja M. Setaro, Sabrina D. Tibbits, Josquin F. G. Batty, Erin L. Fowler, Rachael M. McLay, Todd G. B. Wilcox, Stephen Ades, Peter K. Bayly, Michael J. PLoS One Research Article Previous molecular phylogenetic analyses have resolved the Australian bloodwood eucalypt genus Corymbia (~100 species) as either monophyletic or paraphyletic with respect to Angophora (9–10 species). Here we assess relationships of Corymbia and Angophora using a large dataset of chloroplast DNA sequences (121,016 base pairs; from 90 accessions representing 55 Corymbia and 8 Angophora species, plus 33 accessions of related genera), skimmed from high throughput sequencing of genomic DNA, and compare results with new analyses of nuclear ITS sequences (119 accessions) from previous studies. Maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses of cpDNA resolve well supported trees with most nodes having >95% bootstrap support. These trees strongly reject monophyly of Corymbia, its two subgenera (Corymbia and Blakella), most taxonomic sections (Abbreviatae, Maculatae, Naviculares, Septentrionales), and several species. ITS trees weakly indicate paraphyly of Corymbia (bootstrap support <50% for maximum likelihood, and 71% for parsimony), but are highly incongruent with the cpDNA analyses, in that they support monophyly of both subgenera and some taxonomic sections of Corymbia. The striking incongruence between cpDNA trees and both morphological taxonomy and ITS trees is attributed largely to chloroplast introgression between taxa, because of geographic sharing of chloroplast clades across taxonomic groups. Such introgression has been widely inferred in studies of the related genus Eucalyptus. This is the first report of its likely prevalence in Corymbia and Angophora, but this is consistent with previous morphological inferences of hybridisation between species. Our findings (based on continent-wide sampling) highlight a need for more focussed studies to assess the extent of hybridisation and introgression in the evolutionary history of these genera, and that critical testing of the classification of Corymbia and Angophora requires additional sequence data from nuclear genomes. Public Library of Science 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5905893/ /pubmed/29668710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195034 Text en © 2018 Schuster et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schuster, Tanja M.
Setaro, Sabrina D.
Tibbits, Josquin F. G.
Batty, Erin L.
Fowler, Rachael M.
McLay, Todd G. B.
Wilcox, Stephen
Ades, Peter K.
Bayly, Michael J.
Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae)
title Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae)
title_full Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae)
title_fullStr Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae)
title_full_unstemmed Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae)
title_short Chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the Australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia, family Myrtaceae)
title_sort chloroplast variation is incongruent with classification of the australian bloodwood eucalypts (genus corymbia, family myrtaceae)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5905893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29668710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195034
work_keys_str_mv AT schustertanjam chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae
AT setarosabrinad chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae
AT tibbitsjosquinfg chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae
AT battyerinl chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae
AT fowlerrachaelm chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae
AT mclaytoddgb chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae
AT wilcoxstephen chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae
AT adespeterk chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae
AT baylymichaelj chloroplastvariationisincongruentwithclassificationoftheaustralianbloodwoodeucalyptsgenuscorymbiafamilymyrtaceae