Cargando…

Scleral Buckling under a Slit-lamp Illumination System with a Contact Wide-angle Viewing Lens Compared with an Indirect Ophthalmoscope

PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of scleral buckling surgery performed under a slit-lamp illumination system (Visulux) with a contact wide-angle viewing lens (Mini Quad) in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to compare these outcomes with those of surgery performed under a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Seung Yong, Lee, Youlim, Kim, Mirinae, Park, Young-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5906397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29611372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0092
_version_ 1783315361557381120
author Choi, Seung Yong
Lee, Youlim
Kim, Mirinae
Park, Young-Hoon
author_facet Choi, Seung Yong
Lee, Youlim
Kim, Mirinae
Park, Young-Hoon
author_sort Choi, Seung Yong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of scleral buckling surgery performed under a slit-lamp illumination system (Visulux) with a contact wide-angle viewing lens (Mini Quad) in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to compare these outcomes with those of surgery performed under an indirect ophthalmoscope. METHODS: By retrospective review of electronic medical records, patients with RRD who had undergone scleral buckling surgery were identified. Scleral buckling surgeries were performed with two illumination instruments, a slit-lamp (SL group) and an indirect ophthalmoscope (IO group). Subretinal fluid drainage, cryopexy, and intravitreal gas injection were performed optionally. At 6 months after surgery, anatomical and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Operation time was also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 45 total patients (45 eyes), 28 were included in the SL group, and 17 were included in the IO group. In the SL and IO groups, the primary anatomical success rate was 89.3% and 88.2%, respectively (p = 0.92). The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution change, which reflects improvement in best-corrected visual acuity after surgery, was −0.19 ± 0.38 in the SL group and −0.21 ± 0.63 in the IO group; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.91). The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the SL group (78.9 ± 11.8 minutes) than in the IO group (100.0 ± 13.9 minutes, p < 0.001), especially for patients who underwent additional procedures such as subretinal fluid drainage and cryopexy (81.4 ± 12.9 and 103.5 ± 12.3 minutes, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Scleral buckling surgery performed under a slit-lamp illumination system yielded a similar anatomical success rate and similar functional improvement in RRD compared with surgery performed under an indirect ophthalmoscope. The slit-lamp system could save time, especially in bullous RRD, which requires additional subretinal fluid drainage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5906397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59063972018-04-23 Scleral Buckling under a Slit-lamp Illumination System with a Contact Wide-angle Viewing Lens Compared with an Indirect Ophthalmoscope Choi, Seung Yong Lee, Youlim Kim, Mirinae Park, Young-Hoon Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of scleral buckling surgery performed under a slit-lamp illumination system (Visulux) with a contact wide-angle viewing lens (Mini Quad) in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to compare these outcomes with those of surgery performed under an indirect ophthalmoscope. METHODS: By retrospective review of electronic medical records, patients with RRD who had undergone scleral buckling surgery were identified. Scleral buckling surgeries were performed with two illumination instruments, a slit-lamp (SL group) and an indirect ophthalmoscope (IO group). Subretinal fluid drainage, cryopexy, and intravitreal gas injection were performed optionally. At 6 months after surgery, anatomical and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Operation time was also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 45 total patients (45 eyes), 28 were included in the SL group, and 17 were included in the IO group. In the SL and IO groups, the primary anatomical success rate was 89.3% and 88.2%, respectively (p = 0.92). The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution change, which reflects improvement in best-corrected visual acuity after surgery, was −0.19 ± 0.38 in the SL group and −0.21 ± 0.63 in the IO group; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.91). The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the SL group (78.9 ± 11.8 minutes) than in the IO group (100.0 ± 13.9 minutes, p < 0.001), especially for patients who underwent additional procedures such as subretinal fluid drainage and cryopexy (81.4 ± 12.9 and 103.5 ± 12.3 minutes, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Scleral buckling surgery performed under a slit-lamp illumination system yielded a similar anatomical success rate and similar functional improvement in RRD compared with surgery performed under an indirect ophthalmoscope. The slit-lamp system could save time, especially in bullous RRD, which requires additional subretinal fluid drainage. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2018-04 2018-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5906397/ /pubmed/29611372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0092 Text en © 2018 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Seung Yong
Lee, Youlim
Kim, Mirinae
Park, Young-Hoon
Scleral Buckling under a Slit-lamp Illumination System with a Contact Wide-angle Viewing Lens Compared with an Indirect Ophthalmoscope
title Scleral Buckling under a Slit-lamp Illumination System with a Contact Wide-angle Viewing Lens Compared with an Indirect Ophthalmoscope
title_full Scleral Buckling under a Slit-lamp Illumination System with a Contact Wide-angle Viewing Lens Compared with an Indirect Ophthalmoscope
title_fullStr Scleral Buckling under a Slit-lamp Illumination System with a Contact Wide-angle Viewing Lens Compared with an Indirect Ophthalmoscope
title_full_unstemmed Scleral Buckling under a Slit-lamp Illumination System with a Contact Wide-angle Viewing Lens Compared with an Indirect Ophthalmoscope
title_short Scleral Buckling under a Slit-lamp Illumination System with a Contact Wide-angle Viewing Lens Compared with an Indirect Ophthalmoscope
title_sort scleral buckling under a slit-lamp illumination system with a contact wide-angle viewing lens compared with an indirect ophthalmoscope
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5906397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29611372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0092
work_keys_str_mv AT choiseungyong scleralbucklingunderaslitlampilluminationsystemwithacontactwideangleviewinglenscomparedwithanindirectophthalmoscope
AT leeyoulim scleralbucklingunderaslitlampilluminationsystemwithacontactwideangleviewinglenscomparedwithanindirectophthalmoscope
AT kimmirinae scleralbucklingunderaslitlampilluminationsystemwithacontactwideangleviewinglenscomparedwithanindirectophthalmoscope
AT parkyounghoon scleralbucklingunderaslitlampilluminationsystemwithacontactwideangleviewinglenscomparedwithanindirectophthalmoscope