Cargando…
Inertial Sensor Measurements of Upper-Limb Kinematics in Stroke Patients in Clinic and Home Environment
BACKGROUND: Upper-limb impairments in stroke patients are usually measured in clinical setting using standard clinical assessment. In addition, kinematic analysis using opto-electronic systems has been used in the laboratory setting to map arm recovery. Such kinematic measurements cannot capture the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5906540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707537 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00027 |
_version_ | 1783315391625297920 |
---|---|
author | Held, Jeremia P. O. Klaassen, Bart Eenhoorn, Albert van Beijnum, Bert-Jan F. Buurke, Jaap H. Veltink, Peter H. Luft, Andreas R. |
author_facet | Held, Jeremia P. O. Klaassen, Bart Eenhoorn, Albert van Beijnum, Bert-Jan F. Buurke, Jaap H. Veltink, Peter H. Luft, Andreas R. |
author_sort | Held, Jeremia P. O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Upper-limb impairments in stroke patients are usually measured in clinical setting using standard clinical assessment. In addition, kinematic analysis using opto-electronic systems has been used in the laboratory setting to map arm recovery. Such kinematic measurements cannot capture the actual function of the upper extremity in daily life. The aim of this study is to longitudinally explore the complementarity of post-stroke upper-limb recovery measured by standard clinical assessments and daily-life recorded kinematics. METHODS: The study was designed as an observational, single-group study to evaluate rehabilitation progress in a clinical and home environment, with a full-body sensor system in stroke patients. Kinematic data were recorded with a full-body motion capture suit during clinical assessment and self-directed activities of daily living. The measurements were performed at three time points for 3 h: (1) 2 weeks before discharge of the rehabilitation clinic, (2) right after discharge, and (3) 4 weeks after discharge. The kinematic analysis of reaching movements uses the position and orientation of each body segment to derive the joint angles. Newly developed metrics for classifying activity and quality of upper extremity movement were applied. RESULTS: The data of four stroke patients (three mildly impaired, one sever impaired) were included in this study. The arm motor function assessment improved during the inpatient rehabilitation, but declined in the first 4 weeks after discharge. A change in the data (kinematics and new metrics) from the daily-life recording was seen in in all patients. Despite this worsening patients increased the number of reaches they performed during daily life in their home environment. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to measure arm kinematics using Inertial Measurement Unit sensors during daily life in stroke patients at the different stages of rehabilitation. Our results from the daily-life recordings complemented the data from the clinical assessments and illustrate the potential to identify stroke patient characteristics, based on kinematics, reaching counts, and work area. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02118363. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5906540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59065402018-04-27 Inertial Sensor Measurements of Upper-Limb Kinematics in Stroke Patients in Clinic and Home Environment Held, Jeremia P. O. Klaassen, Bart Eenhoorn, Albert van Beijnum, Bert-Jan F. Buurke, Jaap H. Veltink, Peter H. Luft, Andreas R. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology BACKGROUND: Upper-limb impairments in stroke patients are usually measured in clinical setting using standard clinical assessment. In addition, kinematic analysis using opto-electronic systems has been used in the laboratory setting to map arm recovery. Such kinematic measurements cannot capture the actual function of the upper extremity in daily life. The aim of this study is to longitudinally explore the complementarity of post-stroke upper-limb recovery measured by standard clinical assessments and daily-life recorded kinematics. METHODS: The study was designed as an observational, single-group study to evaluate rehabilitation progress in a clinical and home environment, with a full-body sensor system in stroke patients. Kinematic data were recorded with a full-body motion capture suit during clinical assessment and self-directed activities of daily living. The measurements were performed at three time points for 3 h: (1) 2 weeks before discharge of the rehabilitation clinic, (2) right after discharge, and (3) 4 weeks after discharge. The kinematic analysis of reaching movements uses the position and orientation of each body segment to derive the joint angles. Newly developed metrics for classifying activity and quality of upper extremity movement were applied. RESULTS: The data of four stroke patients (three mildly impaired, one sever impaired) were included in this study. The arm motor function assessment improved during the inpatient rehabilitation, but declined in the first 4 weeks after discharge. A change in the data (kinematics and new metrics) from the daily-life recording was seen in in all patients. Despite this worsening patients increased the number of reaches they performed during daily life in their home environment. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to measure arm kinematics using Inertial Measurement Unit sensors during daily life in stroke patients at the different stages of rehabilitation. Our results from the daily-life recordings complemented the data from the clinical assessments and illustrate the potential to identify stroke patient characteristics, based on kinematics, reaching counts, and work area. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02118363. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5906540/ /pubmed/29707537 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00027 Text en Copyright © 2018 Held, Klaassen, Eenhoorn, Beijnum, Buurke, Veltink and Luft. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Held, Jeremia P. O. Klaassen, Bart Eenhoorn, Albert van Beijnum, Bert-Jan F. Buurke, Jaap H. Veltink, Peter H. Luft, Andreas R. Inertial Sensor Measurements of Upper-Limb Kinematics in Stroke Patients in Clinic and Home Environment |
title | Inertial Sensor Measurements of Upper-Limb Kinematics in Stroke Patients in Clinic and Home Environment |
title_full | Inertial Sensor Measurements of Upper-Limb Kinematics in Stroke Patients in Clinic and Home Environment |
title_fullStr | Inertial Sensor Measurements of Upper-Limb Kinematics in Stroke Patients in Clinic and Home Environment |
title_full_unstemmed | Inertial Sensor Measurements of Upper-Limb Kinematics in Stroke Patients in Clinic and Home Environment |
title_short | Inertial Sensor Measurements of Upper-Limb Kinematics in Stroke Patients in Clinic and Home Environment |
title_sort | inertial sensor measurements of upper-limb kinematics in stroke patients in clinic and home environment |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5906540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707537 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heldjeremiapo inertialsensormeasurementsofupperlimbkinematicsinstrokepatientsinclinicandhomeenvironment AT klaassenbart inertialsensormeasurementsofupperlimbkinematicsinstrokepatientsinclinicandhomeenvironment AT eenhoornalbert inertialsensormeasurementsofupperlimbkinematicsinstrokepatientsinclinicandhomeenvironment AT vanbeijnumbertjanf inertialsensormeasurementsofupperlimbkinematicsinstrokepatientsinclinicandhomeenvironment AT buurkejaaph inertialsensormeasurementsofupperlimbkinematicsinstrokepatientsinclinicandhomeenvironment AT veltinkpeterh inertialsensormeasurementsofupperlimbkinematicsinstrokepatientsinclinicandhomeenvironment AT luftandreasr inertialsensormeasurementsofupperlimbkinematicsinstrokepatientsinclinicandhomeenvironment |