Cargando…
Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones
INTRODUCTION: Shockwave-lithotripsy (SWL) provides a noninvasive and effective option for the management of ureteric calculi. Several factors may affect the success of SWL. Identification of these predictive factors will both increase the efficacy and decrease the cost. This study was designed to id...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719327 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_84_17 |
_version_ | 1783315508807860224 |
---|---|
author | Goel, Hemant Gahlawat, Sumit Bera, Malay Kumar Pal, Dilip Kumar Aggarwal, Onam |
author_facet | Goel, Hemant Gahlawat, Sumit Bera, Malay Kumar Pal, Dilip Kumar Aggarwal, Onam |
author_sort | Goel, Hemant |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Shockwave-lithotripsy (SWL) provides a noninvasive and effective option for the management of ureteric calculi. Several factors may affect the success of SWL. Identification of these predictive factors will both increase the efficacy and decrease the cost. This study was designed to identify factors affecting the outcome of SWL for ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted from March 2012 to November 2014 in patients with solitary ureteric calculi who were managed with SWL. Data were analyzed to identify clinical and radiological factors associated with treatment outcome. Success after SWL was described as complete stone clearance or clinically insignificant residual fragments <3 mm at 3 months after SWL. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients with ureteric calculi were divided into two groups depending on the outcome of SWL, Group A (successful - 76%) and Group B (failed - 24%). Stone size, Skin to stone distance (SSD), secondary signs of obstruction, and presence of double J (DJ) Stent, all were significantly associated with the outcome of SWL on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, stone size, hounsfield unit, SSD, and DJ stent were the independent factors affecting the outcome of SWL. On Receptor-Operator Characteristic curve analysis, a cutoff value of 8.2 mm for the stone size was found which best predicts a successful outcome, with a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 96%. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that Stone size, SSD, the presence of DJ stent, and stone attenuation values are the significant factors that influence the outcome of SWL in patients with ureteral stones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5907324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59073242018-05-01 Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones Goel, Hemant Gahlawat, Sumit Bera, Malay Kumar Pal, Dilip Kumar Aggarwal, Onam Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION: Shockwave-lithotripsy (SWL) provides a noninvasive and effective option for the management of ureteric calculi. Several factors may affect the success of SWL. Identification of these predictive factors will both increase the efficacy and decrease the cost. This study was designed to identify factors affecting the outcome of SWL for ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted from March 2012 to November 2014 in patients with solitary ureteric calculi who were managed with SWL. Data were analyzed to identify clinical and radiological factors associated with treatment outcome. Success after SWL was described as complete stone clearance or clinically insignificant residual fragments <3 mm at 3 months after SWL. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients with ureteric calculi were divided into two groups depending on the outcome of SWL, Group A (successful - 76%) and Group B (failed - 24%). Stone size, Skin to stone distance (SSD), secondary signs of obstruction, and presence of double J (DJ) Stent, all were significantly associated with the outcome of SWL on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, stone size, hounsfield unit, SSD, and DJ stent were the independent factors affecting the outcome of SWL. On Receptor-Operator Characteristic curve analysis, a cutoff value of 8.2 mm for the stone size was found which best predicts a successful outcome, with a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 96%. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that Stone size, SSD, the presence of DJ stent, and stone attenuation values are the significant factors that influence the outcome of SWL in patients with ureteral stones. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5907324/ /pubmed/29719327 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_84_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Goel, Hemant Gahlawat, Sumit Bera, Malay Kumar Pal, Dilip Kumar Aggarwal, Onam Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones |
title | Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones |
title_full | Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones |
title_fullStr | Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones |
title_short | Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones |
title_sort | role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719327 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_84_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goelhemant roleofclinicalandradiologicalparametersinpredictingtheoutcomeofshockwavelithotripsyforuretericstones AT gahlawatsumit roleofclinicalandradiologicalparametersinpredictingtheoutcomeofshockwavelithotripsyforuretericstones AT beramalaykumar roleofclinicalandradiologicalparametersinpredictingtheoutcomeofshockwavelithotripsyforuretericstones AT paldilipkumar roleofclinicalandradiologicalparametersinpredictingtheoutcomeofshockwavelithotripsyforuretericstones AT aggarwalonam roleofclinicalandradiologicalparametersinpredictingtheoutcomeofshockwavelithotripsyforuretericstones |