Cargando…

Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones

INTRODUCTION: Shockwave-lithotripsy (SWL) provides a noninvasive and effective option for the management of ureteric calculi. Several factors may affect the success of SWL. Identification of these predictive factors will both increase the efficacy and decrease the cost. This study was designed to id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goel, Hemant, Gahlawat, Sumit, Bera, Malay Kumar, Pal, Dilip Kumar, Aggarwal, Onam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719327
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_84_17
_version_ 1783315508807860224
author Goel, Hemant
Gahlawat, Sumit
Bera, Malay Kumar
Pal, Dilip Kumar
Aggarwal, Onam
author_facet Goel, Hemant
Gahlawat, Sumit
Bera, Malay Kumar
Pal, Dilip Kumar
Aggarwal, Onam
author_sort Goel, Hemant
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Shockwave-lithotripsy (SWL) provides a noninvasive and effective option for the management of ureteric calculi. Several factors may affect the success of SWL. Identification of these predictive factors will both increase the efficacy and decrease the cost. This study was designed to identify factors affecting the outcome of SWL for ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted from March 2012 to November 2014 in patients with solitary ureteric calculi who were managed with SWL. Data were analyzed to identify clinical and radiological factors associated with treatment outcome. Success after SWL was described as complete stone clearance or clinically insignificant residual fragments <3 mm at 3 months after SWL. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients with ureteric calculi were divided into two groups depending on the outcome of SWL, Group A (successful - 76%) and Group B (failed - 24%). Stone size, Skin to stone distance (SSD), secondary signs of obstruction, and presence of double J (DJ) Stent, all were significantly associated with the outcome of SWL on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, stone size, hounsfield unit, SSD, and DJ stent were the independent factors affecting the outcome of SWL. On Receptor-Operator Characteristic curve analysis, a cutoff value of 8.2 mm for the stone size was found which best predicts a successful outcome, with a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 96%. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that Stone size, SSD, the presence of DJ stent, and stone attenuation values are the significant factors that influence the outcome of SWL in patients with ureteral stones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5907324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59073242018-05-01 Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones Goel, Hemant Gahlawat, Sumit Bera, Malay Kumar Pal, Dilip Kumar Aggarwal, Onam Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION: Shockwave-lithotripsy (SWL) provides a noninvasive and effective option for the management of ureteric calculi. Several factors may affect the success of SWL. Identification of these predictive factors will both increase the efficacy and decrease the cost. This study was designed to identify factors affecting the outcome of SWL for ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted from March 2012 to November 2014 in patients with solitary ureteric calculi who were managed with SWL. Data were analyzed to identify clinical and radiological factors associated with treatment outcome. Success after SWL was described as complete stone clearance or clinically insignificant residual fragments <3 mm at 3 months after SWL. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients with ureteric calculi were divided into two groups depending on the outcome of SWL, Group A (successful - 76%) and Group B (failed - 24%). Stone size, Skin to stone distance (SSD), secondary signs of obstruction, and presence of double J (DJ) Stent, all were significantly associated with the outcome of SWL on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, stone size, hounsfield unit, SSD, and DJ stent were the independent factors affecting the outcome of SWL. On Receptor-Operator Characteristic curve analysis, a cutoff value of 8.2 mm for the stone size was found which best predicts a successful outcome, with a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 96%. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that Stone size, SSD, the presence of DJ stent, and stone attenuation values are the significant factors that influence the outcome of SWL in patients with ureteral stones. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5907324/ /pubmed/29719327 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_84_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goel, Hemant
Gahlawat, Sumit
Bera, Malay Kumar
Pal, Dilip Kumar
Aggarwal, Onam
Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones
title Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones
title_full Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones
title_fullStr Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones
title_full_unstemmed Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones
title_short Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones
title_sort role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719327
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_84_17
work_keys_str_mv AT goelhemant roleofclinicalandradiologicalparametersinpredictingtheoutcomeofshockwavelithotripsyforuretericstones
AT gahlawatsumit roleofclinicalandradiologicalparametersinpredictingtheoutcomeofshockwavelithotripsyforuretericstones
AT beramalaykumar roleofclinicalandradiologicalparametersinpredictingtheoutcomeofshockwavelithotripsyforuretericstones
AT paldilipkumar roleofclinicalandradiologicalparametersinpredictingtheoutcomeofshockwavelithotripsyforuretericstones
AT aggarwalonam roleofclinicalandradiologicalparametersinpredictingtheoutcomeofshockwavelithotripsyforuretericstones