Cargando…

Assessment of an optimized manufacturing process for inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity study in children and adults

BACKGROUND: GSK has modified the licensed monovalent bulk manufacturing process for its split-virion inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) to harmonize the process among different strains, resulting in an increased number of finished vaccine doses, while compensating for the change from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claeys, Carine, Drame, Mamadou, García-Sicilia, José, Zaman, Khalequ, Carmona, Alfonso, Tran, Phu My, Miranda, Mariano, Martinón-Torres, Federico, Thollot, Franck, Horn, Michael, Schwarz, Tino F., Behre, Ulrich, Merino, José M., Sadowska-Krawczenko, Iwona, Szymański, Henryk, Schu, Peter, Neumeier, Elisabeth, Li, Ping, Jain, Varsha K., Innis, Bruce L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29669531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3079-8
_version_ 1783315514499530752
author Claeys, Carine
Drame, Mamadou
García-Sicilia, José
Zaman, Khalequ
Carmona, Alfonso
Tran, Phu My
Miranda, Mariano
Martinón-Torres, Federico
Thollot, Franck
Horn, Michael
Schwarz, Tino F.
Behre, Ulrich
Merino, José M.
Sadowska-Krawczenko, Iwona
Szymański, Henryk
Schu, Peter
Neumeier, Elisabeth
Li, Ping
Jain, Varsha K.
Innis, Bruce L.
author_facet Claeys, Carine
Drame, Mamadou
García-Sicilia, José
Zaman, Khalequ
Carmona, Alfonso
Tran, Phu My
Miranda, Mariano
Martinón-Torres, Federico
Thollot, Franck
Horn, Michael
Schwarz, Tino F.
Behre, Ulrich
Merino, José M.
Sadowska-Krawczenko, Iwona
Szymański, Henryk
Schu, Peter
Neumeier, Elisabeth
Li, Ping
Jain, Varsha K.
Innis, Bruce L.
author_sort Claeys, Carine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: GSK has modified the licensed monovalent bulk manufacturing process for its split-virion inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) to harmonize the process among different strains, resulting in an increased number of finished vaccine doses, while compensating for the change from inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3) to IIV4. To confirm the manufacturing changes do not alter the profile of the vaccine, a clinical trial was conducted to compare IIV4 made by the currently licensed process with a vaccine made by the new (investigational) process (IIV4-I). The main objectives were to compare the reactogenicity and safety of IIV4-I versus IIV4 in all age groups, and to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody responses based on the geometric mean titer ratio of IIV4-I versus IIV4 in children. METHODS: The Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multinational study included three cohorts: adults (18–49 years; N = 120), children (3–17 years; N = 821), and infants (6–35 months; N = 940). Eligible subjects in each cohort were randomized 1:1 to receive IIV4-I or IIV4. Both vaccines contained 15 μg of hemagglutinin antigen for each of the four seasonal virus strains. Adults and vaccine-primed children received one dose of vaccine, and vaccine-unprimed children received two doses of vaccine 28 days apart. All children aged ≥9 years were considered to be vaccine-primed and received one dose of vaccine. RESULTS: The primary immunogenicity objective of the study was met in demonstrating immunogenic non-inferiority of IIV4-I versus IIV4 in children. The IIV4-I was immunogenic against all four vaccine strains in each age cohort. The reactogenicity and safety profile of IIV4-I was similar to IIV4 in each age cohort, and there was no increase in the relative risk of fever (≥38 °C) with IIV4-I versus IIV4 within the 7-day post-vaccination period in infants (1.06; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.75, 1.50; p = 0.786). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that in adults, children, and infants, the IIV4-I made using an investigational manufacturing process was immunogenic with a reactogenicity and safety profile that was similar to licensed IIV4. These results support that the investigational process used to manufacture IIV4-I is suitable to replace the current licensed process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02207413; trial registration date: August 4, 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3079-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5907359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59073592018-04-30 Assessment of an optimized manufacturing process for inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity study in children and adults Claeys, Carine Drame, Mamadou García-Sicilia, José Zaman, Khalequ Carmona, Alfonso Tran, Phu My Miranda, Mariano Martinón-Torres, Federico Thollot, Franck Horn, Michael Schwarz, Tino F. Behre, Ulrich Merino, José M. Sadowska-Krawczenko, Iwona Szymański, Henryk Schu, Peter Neumeier, Elisabeth Li, Ping Jain, Varsha K. Innis, Bruce L. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: GSK has modified the licensed monovalent bulk manufacturing process for its split-virion inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) to harmonize the process among different strains, resulting in an increased number of finished vaccine doses, while compensating for the change from inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3) to IIV4. To confirm the manufacturing changes do not alter the profile of the vaccine, a clinical trial was conducted to compare IIV4 made by the currently licensed process with a vaccine made by the new (investigational) process (IIV4-I). The main objectives were to compare the reactogenicity and safety of IIV4-I versus IIV4 in all age groups, and to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody responses based on the geometric mean titer ratio of IIV4-I versus IIV4 in children. METHODS: The Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multinational study included three cohorts: adults (18–49 years; N = 120), children (3–17 years; N = 821), and infants (6–35 months; N = 940). Eligible subjects in each cohort were randomized 1:1 to receive IIV4-I or IIV4. Both vaccines contained 15 μg of hemagglutinin antigen for each of the four seasonal virus strains. Adults and vaccine-primed children received one dose of vaccine, and vaccine-unprimed children received two doses of vaccine 28 days apart. All children aged ≥9 years were considered to be vaccine-primed and received one dose of vaccine. RESULTS: The primary immunogenicity objective of the study was met in demonstrating immunogenic non-inferiority of IIV4-I versus IIV4 in children. The IIV4-I was immunogenic against all four vaccine strains in each age cohort. The reactogenicity and safety profile of IIV4-I was similar to IIV4 in each age cohort, and there was no increase in the relative risk of fever (≥38 °C) with IIV4-I versus IIV4 within the 7-day post-vaccination period in infants (1.06; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.75, 1.50; p = 0.786). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that in adults, children, and infants, the IIV4-I made using an investigational manufacturing process was immunogenic with a reactogenicity and safety profile that was similar to licensed IIV4. These results support that the investigational process used to manufacture IIV4-I is suitable to replace the current licensed process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02207413; trial registration date: August 4, 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3079-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5907359/ /pubmed/29669531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3079-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Claeys, Carine
Drame, Mamadou
García-Sicilia, José
Zaman, Khalequ
Carmona, Alfonso
Tran, Phu My
Miranda, Mariano
Martinón-Torres, Federico
Thollot, Franck
Horn, Michael
Schwarz, Tino F.
Behre, Ulrich
Merino, José M.
Sadowska-Krawczenko, Iwona
Szymański, Henryk
Schu, Peter
Neumeier, Elisabeth
Li, Ping
Jain, Varsha K.
Innis, Bruce L.
Assessment of an optimized manufacturing process for inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity study in children and adults
title Assessment of an optimized manufacturing process for inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity study in children and adults
title_full Assessment of an optimized manufacturing process for inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity study in children and adults
title_fullStr Assessment of an optimized manufacturing process for inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity study in children and adults
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of an optimized manufacturing process for inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity study in children and adults
title_short Assessment of an optimized manufacturing process for inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity study in children and adults
title_sort assessment of an optimized manufacturing process for inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a phase iii, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity study in children and adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29669531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3079-8
work_keys_str_mv AT claeyscarine assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT dramemamadou assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT garciasiciliajose assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT zamankhalequ assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT carmonaalfonso assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT tranphumy assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT mirandamariano assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT martinontorresfederico assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT thollotfranck assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT hornmichael assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT schwarztinof assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT behreulrich assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT merinojosem assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT sadowskakrawczenkoiwona assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT szymanskihenryk assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT schupeter assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT neumeierelisabeth assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT liping assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT jainvarshak assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults
AT innisbrucel assessmentofanoptimizedmanufacturingprocessforinactivatedquadrivalentinfluenzavaccineaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindsafetyandimmunogenicitystudyinchildrenandadults