Cargando…

Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The consequences of treatment for Head and Neck cancer (HNC) patients has profound detrimental impacts such as impaired QOL, emotional distress, delayed recovery and frequent use of healthcare. The aim of this trial is to determine if the routine use of the Patients Concerns Inventory (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogers, Simon N., Lowe, Derek, Lowies, Cher, Yeo, Seow Tien, Allmark, Christine, Mcavery, Dominic, Humphris, Gerald M., Flavel, Robert, Semple, Cherith, Thomas, Steven J., Kanatas, Anastasios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29669529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4355-0
_version_ 1783315518979047424
author Rogers, Simon N.
Lowe, Derek
Lowies, Cher
Yeo, Seow Tien
Allmark, Christine
Mcavery, Dominic
Humphris, Gerald M.
Flavel, Robert
Semple, Cherith
Thomas, Steven J.
Kanatas, Anastasios
author_facet Rogers, Simon N.
Lowe, Derek
Lowies, Cher
Yeo, Seow Tien
Allmark, Christine
Mcavery, Dominic
Humphris, Gerald M.
Flavel, Robert
Semple, Cherith
Thomas, Steven J.
Kanatas, Anastasios
author_sort Rogers, Simon N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The consequences of treatment for Head and Neck cancer (HNC) patients has profound detrimental impacts such as impaired QOL, emotional distress, delayed recovery and frequent use of healthcare. The aim of this trial is to determine if the routine use of the Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) package in review clinics during the first year following treatment can improve overall quality of life, reduce the social-emotional impact of cancer and reduce levels of distress. Furthermore, we aim to describe the economic costs and benefits of using the PCI. METHODS: This will be a cluster preference randomised control trial with consultants either ‘using’ or ‘not using’ the PCI package at clinic. It will involve two centres Leeds and Liverpool. 416 eligible patients from at least 10 consultant clusters are required to show a clinically meaningful difference in the primary outcome. The primary outcome is the percentage of participants with less than good overall quality of life at the final one-year clinic as measured by the University of Washington QOL questionnaire version 4 (UWQOLv4). Secondary outcomes at one-year are the mean social-emotional subscale (UWQOLv4) score, Distress Thermometer (DT) score ≥ 4, and key health economic measures (QALY-EQ-5D-5 L; CSRI). DISCUSSION: This trial will provide knowledge on the effectiveness of a consultation intervention package based around the PCI used at routine follow-up clinics following treatment of head and neck cancer with curative intent. If this intervention is (cost) effective for patients, the next step will be to promote wider use of this approach as standard care in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 32,382. Clinical Trials Identifier, NCT03086629. Protocol: Version 3.0, 1st July 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5907378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59073782018-04-30 Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial Rogers, Simon N. Lowe, Derek Lowies, Cher Yeo, Seow Tien Allmark, Christine Mcavery, Dominic Humphris, Gerald M. Flavel, Robert Semple, Cherith Thomas, Steven J. Kanatas, Anastasios BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The consequences of treatment for Head and Neck cancer (HNC) patients has profound detrimental impacts such as impaired QOL, emotional distress, delayed recovery and frequent use of healthcare. The aim of this trial is to determine if the routine use of the Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) package in review clinics during the first year following treatment can improve overall quality of life, reduce the social-emotional impact of cancer and reduce levels of distress. Furthermore, we aim to describe the economic costs and benefits of using the PCI. METHODS: This will be a cluster preference randomised control trial with consultants either ‘using’ or ‘not using’ the PCI package at clinic. It will involve two centres Leeds and Liverpool. 416 eligible patients from at least 10 consultant clusters are required to show a clinically meaningful difference in the primary outcome. The primary outcome is the percentage of participants with less than good overall quality of life at the final one-year clinic as measured by the University of Washington QOL questionnaire version 4 (UWQOLv4). Secondary outcomes at one-year are the mean social-emotional subscale (UWQOLv4) score, Distress Thermometer (DT) score ≥ 4, and key health economic measures (QALY-EQ-5D-5 L; CSRI). DISCUSSION: This trial will provide knowledge on the effectiveness of a consultation intervention package based around the PCI used at routine follow-up clinics following treatment of head and neck cancer with curative intent. If this intervention is (cost) effective for patients, the next step will be to promote wider use of this approach as standard care in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 32,382. Clinical Trials Identifier, NCT03086629. Protocol: Version 3.0, 1st July 2017. BioMed Central 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5907378/ /pubmed/29669529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4355-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rogers, Simon N.
Lowe, Derek
Lowies, Cher
Yeo, Seow Tien
Allmark, Christine
Mcavery, Dominic
Humphris, Gerald M.
Flavel, Robert
Semple, Cherith
Thomas, Steven J.
Kanatas, Anastasios
Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial
title Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial
title_full Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial
title_short Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial
title_sort improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29669529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4355-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rogerssimonn improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lowederek improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lowiescher improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yeoseowtien improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT allmarkchristine improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcaverydominic improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT humphrisgeraldm improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT flavelrobert improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT semplecherith improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thomasstevenj improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kanatasanastasios improvingqualityoflifethroughtheroutineuseofthepatientconcernsinventoryforheadandneckcancerpatientsaclusterpreferencerandomizedcontrolledtrial