Cargando…

Comparison of methods to assess onset of breast development in the LEGACY Girls Study: methodological considerations for studies of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Younger age at onset of breast development, which has been declining in recent decades, is associated with increased breast cancer risk independent of age at menarche. Given the need to study the drivers of these trends, it is essential to validate methods to assess breast onset that can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houghton, Lauren C., Knight, Julia A., De Souza, Mary Jane, Goldberg, Mandy, White, Melissa L., O’Toole, Karen, Chung, Wendy K., Bradbury, Angela R., Daly, Mary B., Andrulis, Irene L., John, Esther M., Buys, Saundra S., Terry, Mary Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29669587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-0943-9
_version_ 1783315519449858048
author Houghton, Lauren C.
Knight, Julia A.
De Souza, Mary Jane
Goldberg, Mandy
White, Melissa L.
O’Toole, Karen
Chung, Wendy K.
Bradbury, Angela R.
Daly, Mary B.
Andrulis, Irene L.
John, Esther M.
Buys, Saundra S.
Terry, Mary Beth
author_facet Houghton, Lauren C.
Knight, Julia A.
De Souza, Mary Jane
Goldberg, Mandy
White, Melissa L.
O’Toole, Karen
Chung, Wendy K.
Bradbury, Angela R.
Daly, Mary B.
Andrulis, Irene L.
John, Esther M.
Buys, Saundra S.
Terry, Mary Beth
author_sort Houghton, Lauren C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Younger age at onset of breast development, which has been declining in recent decades, is associated with increased breast cancer risk independent of age at menarche. Given the need to study the drivers of these trends, it is essential to validate methods to assess breast onset that can be used in large-scale studies when direct clinical assessment of breast onset is not feasible. METHODS: Breast development is usually measured by Tanner stages (TSs), assessed either by physical examination or by mother’s report using a picture-based Sexual Maturation Scale (SMS). As an alternative, a mother-reported Pubertal Development Scale (PDS) without pictures has been used in some studies. We compared agreement of SMS and PDS with each other (n = 1022) and the accuracy of PDS with clinical TS as a gold standard for the subset of girls with this measure (n = 282) using the LEGACY cohort. We further compared prediction of breast onset using ROC curves and tested whether adding urinary estrone 1-glucuronide (E1G) improved the AUC. RESULTS: The agreement of PDS with SMS was high (kappa = 0.80). The sensitivity of PDS vs clinical TS was 86.6%. The AUCs for PDS alone and SMS alone were 0.88 and 0.79, respectively. Including E1G concentrations improved the AUC for both methods (0.91 and 0.86 for PDS and SMS, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The PDS without pictures is a highly accurate, sensitive, and specific method for assessing breast onset, especially in settings where clinical TS is not feasible. In addition, it is comparable to SMS methods with pictures and thus easier to implement in large-scale studies, particularly phone-based interviews where pictures may not be available. Urinary E1G can improve accuracy over than PDS or SMS alone. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-018-0943-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5907380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59073802018-04-30 Comparison of methods to assess onset of breast development in the LEGACY Girls Study: methodological considerations for studies of breast cancer Houghton, Lauren C. Knight, Julia A. De Souza, Mary Jane Goldberg, Mandy White, Melissa L. O’Toole, Karen Chung, Wendy K. Bradbury, Angela R. Daly, Mary B. Andrulis, Irene L. John, Esther M. Buys, Saundra S. Terry, Mary Beth Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Younger age at onset of breast development, which has been declining in recent decades, is associated with increased breast cancer risk independent of age at menarche. Given the need to study the drivers of these trends, it is essential to validate methods to assess breast onset that can be used in large-scale studies when direct clinical assessment of breast onset is not feasible. METHODS: Breast development is usually measured by Tanner stages (TSs), assessed either by physical examination or by mother’s report using a picture-based Sexual Maturation Scale (SMS). As an alternative, a mother-reported Pubertal Development Scale (PDS) without pictures has been used in some studies. We compared agreement of SMS and PDS with each other (n = 1022) and the accuracy of PDS with clinical TS as a gold standard for the subset of girls with this measure (n = 282) using the LEGACY cohort. We further compared prediction of breast onset using ROC curves and tested whether adding urinary estrone 1-glucuronide (E1G) improved the AUC. RESULTS: The agreement of PDS with SMS was high (kappa = 0.80). The sensitivity of PDS vs clinical TS was 86.6%. The AUCs for PDS alone and SMS alone were 0.88 and 0.79, respectively. Including E1G concentrations improved the AUC for both methods (0.91 and 0.86 for PDS and SMS, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The PDS without pictures is a highly accurate, sensitive, and specific method for assessing breast onset, especially in settings where clinical TS is not feasible. In addition, it is comparable to SMS methods with pictures and thus easier to implement in large-scale studies, particularly phone-based interviews where pictures may not be available. Urinary E1G can improve accuracy over than PDS or SMS alone. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-018-0943-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-18 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5907380/ /pubmed/29669587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-0943-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Houghton, Lauren C.
Knight, Julia A.
De Souza, Mary Jane
Goldberg, Mandy
White, Melissa L.
O’Toole, Karen
Chung, Wendy K.
Bradbury, Angela R.
Daly, Mary B.
Andrulis, Irene L.
John, Esther M.
Buys, Saundra S.
Terry, Mary Beth
Comparison of methods to assess onset of breast development in the LEGACY Girls Study: methodological considerations for studies of breast cancer
title Comparison of methods to assess onset of breast development in the LEGACY Girls Study: methodological considerations for studies of breast cancer
title_full Comparison of methods to assess onset of breast development in the LEGACY Girls Study: methodological considerations for studies of breast cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of methods to assess onset of breast development in the LEGACY Girls Study: methodological considerations for studies of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods to assess onset of breast development in the LEGACY Girls Study: methodological considerations for studies of breast cancer
title_short Comparison of methods to assess onset of breast development in the LEGACY Girls Study: methodological considerations for studies of breast cancer
title_sort comparison of methods to assess onset of breast development in the legacy girls study: methodological considerations for studies of breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29669587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-0943-9
work_keys_str_mv AT houghtonlaurenc comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT knightjuliaa comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT desouzamaryjane comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT goldbergmandy comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT whitemelissal comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT otoolekaren comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT chungwendyk comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT bradburyangelar comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT dalymaryb comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT andrulisirenel comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT johnestherm comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT buyssaundras comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer
AT terrymarybeth comparisonofmethodstoassessonsetofbreastdevelopmentinthelegacygirlsstudymethodologicalconsiderationsforstudiesofbreastcancer