Cargando…
Role of Anti-MICA Antibodies in Graft Survival of Renal Transplant Recipients of India
INTRODUCTION: The MIC (MHC class I chain-related) genes are a group of nonclassical MHC genes, located in the MHC class 1 region of chromosome 6. The aim of the present study was to find the prevalence of MHC class 1 chain-related (MICA) alloantibodies in patients undergoing live-related donor renal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3434050 |
_version_ | 1783315529228877824 |
---|---|
author | Chowdhry, Mohit Makroo, R. N. Singh, Mandhata Kumar, Manoj Thakur, Yogita Sharma, Vandana |
author_facet | Chowdhry, Mohit Makroo, R. N. Singh, Mandhata Kumar, Manoj Thakur, Yogita Sharma, Vandana |
author_sort | Chowdhry, Mohit |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The MIC (MHC class I chain-related) genes are a group of nonclassical MHC genes, located in the MHC class 1 region of chromosome 6. The aim of the present study was to find the prevalence of MHC class 1 chain-related (MICA) alloantibodies in patients undergoing live-related donor renal transplantation and its role in short-term graft survival. The role of blood transfusion in the formation of these antibodies was also studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pretransplant samples of patients undergoing renal allograft transplantation were tested for anti-MICA antibodies. Association of various demographics, HLA-A + B + DRB1 mismatches, anti-HLA antibody screen, and anti-MICA antibodies was assessed using Pearson's chi-square test. RESULTS: Out of 646 serum samples, 94 (14.6%) were positive and 552 (85.4%) were negative for anti-MICA antibodies. Patients with anti-MICA antibody had a graft survival 89.3% as compared to 94.7% in patients without anti-MICA antibody (P < 0.05). The hazard ratio for all patients was 3.0701 (P < 0.05). Out of the 340 patients with no HLA antibodies, the presence of anti-MICA antibodies without any HLA antibodies (n = 43) was associated with poor outcome in the patients (hazard ratio of 2.768, P < 0.05). The presence of MICA antibodies with HLA antibodies did not decrease the graft survival (hazards ratio of 1.3750, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Preformed MICA antibodies independently increase the risk of kidney rejection and therefore recommend that guidelines should be formed for mandatory testing of these antibodies prior to renal transplant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5907422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59074222018-05-30 Role of Anti-MICA Antibodies in Graft Survival of Renal Transplant Recipients of India Chowdhry, Mohit Makroo, R. N. Singh, Mandhata Kumar, Manoj Thakur, Yogita Sharma, Vandana J Immunol Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: The MIC (MHC class I chain-related) genes are a group of nonclassical MHC genes, located in the MHC class 1 region of chromosome 6. The aim of the present study was to find the prevalence of MHC class 1 chain-related (MICA) alloantibodies in patients undergoing live-related donor renal transplantation and its role in short-term graft survival. The role of blood transfusion in the formation of these antibodies was also studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pretransplant samples of patients undergoing renal allograft transplantation were tested for anti-MICA antibodies. Association of various demographics, HLA-A + B + DRB1 mismatches, anti-HLA antibody screen, and anti-MICA antibodies was assessed using Pearson's chi-square test. RESULTS: Out of 646 serum samples, 94 (14.6%) were positive and 552 (85.4%) were negative for anti-MICA antibodies. Patients with anti-MICA antibody had a graft survival 89.3% as compared to 94.7% in patients without anti-MICA antibody (P < 0.05). The hazard ratio for all patients was 3.0701 (P < 0.05). Out of the 340 patients with no HLA antibodies, the presence of anti-MICA antibodies without any HLA antibodies (n = 43) was associated with poor outcome in the patients (hazard ratio of 2.768, P < 0.05). The presence of MICA antibodies with HLA antibodies did not decrease the graft survival (hazards ratio of 1.3750, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Preformed MICA antibodies independently increase the risk of kidney rejection and therefore recommend that guidelines should be formed for mandatory testing of these antibodies prior to renal transplant. Hindawi 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5907422/ /pubmed/29850626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3434050 Text en Copyright © 2018 Mohit Chowdhry et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chowdhry, Mohit Makroo, R. N. Singh, Mandhata Kumar, Manoj Thakur, Yogita Sharma, Vandana Role of Anti-MICA Antibodies in Graft Survival of Renal Transplant Recipients of India |
title | Role of Anti-MICA Antibodies in Graft Survival of Renal Transplant Recipients of India |
title_full | Role of Anti-MICA Antibodies in Graft Survival of Renal Transplant Recipients of India |
title_fullStr | Role of Anti-MICA Antibodies in Graft Survival of Renal Transplant Recipients of India |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of Anti-MICA Antibodies in Graft Survival of Renal Transplant Recipients of India |
title_short | Role of Anti-MICA Antibodies in Graft Survival of Renal Transplant Recipients of India |
title_sort | role of anti-mica antibodies in graft survival of renal transplant recipients of india |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3434050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chowdhrymohit roleofantimicaantibodiesingraftsurvivalofrenaltransplantrecipientsofindia AT makroorn roleofantimicaantibodiesingraftsurvivalofrenaltransplantrecipientsofindia AT singhmandhata roleofantimicaantibodiesingraftsurvivalofrenaltransplantrecipientsofindia AT kumarmanoj roleofantimicaantibodiesingraftsurvivalofrenaltransplantrecipientsofindia AT thakuryogita roleofantimicaantibodiesingraftsurvivalofrenaltransplantrecipientsofindia AT sharmavandana roleofantimicaantibodiesingraftsurvivalofrenaltransplantrecipientsofindia |