Cargando…

Effect site concentration of propofol at induction and recovery of anaesthesia - A correlative dose-response study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sound knowledge about effect site concentration (Ce) of propofol aids in smooth induction, maintenance and early recovery. We studied the correlation between Ce of propofol at loss of response to verbal command and recovery concentration using target-controlled infusion (TCI) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sukumar, Vasanth, Radhakrishnan, Arathi, Keshavan, Venkatesh H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29720751
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_670_17
_version_ 1783315531293523968
author Sukumar, Vasanth
Radhakrishnan, Arathi
Keshavan, Venkatesh H
author_facet Sukumar, Vasanth
Radhakrishnan, Arathi
Keshavan, Venkatesh H
author_sort Sukumar, Vasanth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sound knowledge about effect site concentration (Ce) of propofol aids in smooth induction, maintenance and early recovery. We studied the correlation between Ce of propofol at loss of response to verbal command and recovery concentration using target-controlled infusion (TCI) in Indian patients who underwent spine surgeries. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing spine surgeries were included. Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) technique with TCI for propofol using modified Marsh model was used. Entropy and neuromuscular transmission were used. Ce at induction and recovery and the corresponding state entropy (SE) values were noted. RESULTS: The mean propofol Ce and SE at induction were 2.34 ± 0.24 μg/ml and 52 ± 8, respectively. The mean propofol Ce and SE at recovery were 1.02 ± 0.22 μg/ml and 86.80 ± 2.86, respectively. The Ce at recovery was approximately 50% of the induction value. The correlation coefficient 'r' between Ce at induction and recovery was 0.56. The mean infusion dose of propofol during the maintenance period was 81 ± 14.33 μg/kg/min. The average induction dose of propofol was 1.17 ± 0.2 mg/kg. CONCLUSION: There is a positive correlation between Ce at induction and recovery. Ce for recovery may have to be set at a lower level during TCI-TIVA and appropriately infusion should be stopped for early recovery. The induction and maintenance doses of propofol are lower than the recommended doses. Data emphasise the need for pharmacokinetic model based on our population characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5907431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59074312018-05-02 Effect site concentration of propofol at induction and recovery of anaesthesia - A correlative dose-response study Sukumar, Vasanth Radhakrishnan, Arathi Keshavan, Venkatesh H Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sound knowledge about effect site concentration (Ce) of propofol aids in smooth induction, maintenance and early recovery. We studied the correlation between Ce of propofol at loss of response to verbal command and recovery concentration using target-controlled infusion (TCI) in Indian patients who underwent spine surgeries. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing spine surgeries were included. Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) technique with TCI for propofol using modified Marsh model was used. Entropy and neuromuscular transmission were used. Ce at induction and recovery and the corresponding state entropy (SE) values were noted. RESULTS: The mean propofol Ce and SE at induction were 2.34 ± 0.24 μg/ml and 52 ± 8, respectively. The mean propofol Ce and SE at recovery were 1.02 ± 0.22 μg/ml and 86.80 ± 2.86, respectively. The Ce at recovery was approximately 50% of the induction value. The correlation coefficient 'r' between Ce at induction and recovery was 0.56. The mean infusion dose of propofol during the maintenance period was 81 ± 14.33 μg/kg/min. The average induction dose of propofol was 1.17 ± 0.2 mg/kg. CONCLUSION: There is a positive correlation between Ce at induction and recovery. Ce for recovery may have to be set at a lower level during TCI-TIVA and appropriately infusion should be stopped for early recovery. The induction and maintenance doses of propofol are lower than the recommended doses. Data emphasise the need for pharmacokinetic model based on our population characteristics. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5907431/ /pubmed/29720751 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_670_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sukumar, Vasanth
Radhakrishnan, Arathi
Keshavan, Venkatesh H
Effect site concentration of propofol at induction and recovery of anaesthesia - A correlative dose-response study
title Effect site concentration of propofol at induction and recovery of anaesthesia - A correlative dose-response study
title_full Effect site concentration of propofol at induction and recovery of anaesthesia - A correlative dose-response study
title_fullStr Effect site concentration of propofol at induction and recovery of anaesthesia - A correlative dose-response study
title_full_unstemmed Effect site concentration of propofol at induction and recovery of anaesthesia - A correlative dose-response study
title_short Effect site concentration of propofol at induction and recovery of anaesthesia - A correlative dose-response study
title_sort effect site concentration of propofol at induction and recovery of anaesthesia - a correlative dose-response study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29720751
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_670_17
work_keys_str_mv AT sukumarvasanth effectsiteconcentrationofpropofolatinductionandrecoveryofanaesthesiaacorrelativedoseresponsestudy
AT radhakrishnanarathi effectsiteconcentrationofpropofolatinductionandrecoveryofanaesthesiaacorrelativedoseresponsestudy
AT keshavanvenkateshh effectsiteconcentrationofpropofolatinductionandrecoveryofanaesthesiaacorrelativedoseresponsestudy