Cargando…

Comparison of Respiratory Pathogen Detection in Upper versus Lower Respiratory Tract Samples Using the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel in the Immunocompromised Host

BACKGROUND: The FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FARP) (BioFire Diagnostics, Inc.) is a multiplex, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique that can detect 17 respiratory viruses and 3 bacterial targets in a single reaction. Immunocompromised hosts (ICH) with respiratory illnesses often undergo broncho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azadeh, Natalya, Sakata, Kenneth K., Saeed, Ali, Mullon, John J., Grys, Thomas E., Limper, Andrew H., Binnicker, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2685723
_version_ 1783315542503849984
author Azadeh, Natalya
Sakata, Kenneth K.
Saeed, Ali
Mullon, John J.
Grys, Thomas E.
Limper, Andrew H.
Binnicker, Matthew J.
author_facet Azadeh, Natalya
Sakata, Kenneth K.
Saeed, Ali
Mullon, John J.
Grys, Thomas E.
Limper, Andrew H.
Binnicker, Matthew J.
author_sort Azadeh, Natalya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FARP) (BioFire Diagnostics, Inc.) is a multiplex, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique that can detect 17 respiratory viruses and 3 bacterial targets in a single reaction. Immunocompromised hosts (ICH) with respiratory illnesses often undergo bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). This prospective study aimed to evaluate the yield and concordance of NP and BAL FARP testing when performed on the same patient concurrently. METHODS: From February to December 2016, 125 patients (100 ICH and 25 non-ICH) were enrolled. NP swabs and BAL samples were sent for FARP testing. RESULTS: The yield of the BAL FARP among ICH and non-ICH was 24% (24/100) and 8% (2/25), respectively. The yield of positive NP swabs in ICH was 27% (27/100) versus 4% (1/25) in non-ICH. The majority of patients (89%; 111/125) had concordant results between NP and BAL specimens. Of the 24 ICH patients who had a positive BAL FARP, the majority (79%) had the same pathogen detected from the NP swab. CONCLUSION: The FARP may be useful in the ICH. Given the high concordance, in patients whom a pathogen is identified on the NP FARP, a FARP performed on BAL will likely yield the same result. However, if the NP FARP is negative, performing the test on a BAL sample may have an incremental yield.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5907482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59074822018-05-30 Comparison of Respiratory Pathogen Detection in Upper versus Lower Respiratory Tract Samples Using the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel in the Immunocompromised Host Azadeh, Natalya Sakata, Kenneth K. Saeed, Ali Mullon, John J. Grys, Thomas E. Limper, Andrew H. Binnicker, Matthew J. Can Respir J Research Article BACKGROUND: The FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FARP) (BioFire Diagnostics, Inc.) is a multiplex, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique that can detect 17 respiratory viruses and 3 bacterial targets in a single reaction. Immunocompromised hosts (ICH) with respiratory illnesses often undergo bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). This prospective study aimed to evaluate the yield and concordance of NP and BAL FARP testing when performed on the same patient concurrently. METHODS: From February to December 2016, 125 patients (100 ICH and 25 non-ICH) were enrolled. NP swabs and BAL samples were sent for FARP testing. RESULTS: The yield of the BAL FARP among ICH and non-ICH was 24% (24/100) and 8% (2/25), respectively. The yield of positive NP swabs in ICH was 27% (27/100) versus 4% (1/25) in non-ICH. The majority of patients (89%; 111/125) had concordant results between NP and BAL specimens. Of the 24 ICH patients who had a positive BAL FARP, the majority (79%) had the same pathogen detected from the NP swab. CONCLUSION: The FARP may be useful in the ICH. Given the high concordance, in patients whom a pathogen is identified on the NP FARP, a FARP performed on BAL will likely yield the same result. However, if the NP FARP is negative, performing the test on a BAL sample may have an incremental yield. Hindawi 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5907482/ /pubmed/29849830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2685723 Text en Copyright © 2018 Natalya Azadeh et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Azadeh, Natalya
Sakata, Kenneth K.
Saeed, Ali
Mullon, John J.
Grys, Thomas E.
Limper, Andrew H.
Binnicker, Matthew J.
Comparison of Respiratory Pathogen Detection in Upper versus Lower Respiratory Tract Samples Using the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel in the Immunocompromised Host
title Comparison of Respiratory Pathogen Detection in Upper versus Lower Respiratory Tract Samples Using the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel in the Immunocompromised Host
title_full Comparison of Respiratory Pathogen Detection in Upper versus Lower Respiratory Tract Samples Using the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel in the Immunocompromised Host
title_fullStr Comparison of Respiratory Pathogen Detection in Upper versus Lower Respiratory Tract Samples Using the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel in the Immunocompromised Host
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Respiratory Pathogen Detection in Upper versus Lower Respiratory Tract Samples Using the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel in the Immunocompromised Host
title_short Comparison of Respiratory Pathogen Detection in Upper versus Lower Respiratory Tract Samples Using the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel in the Immunocompromised Host
title_sort comparison of respiratory pathogen detection in upper versus lower respiratory tract samples using the biofire filmarray respiratory panel in the immunocompromised host
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2685723
work_keys_str_mv AT azadehnatalya comparisonofrespiratorypathogendetectioninupperversuslowerrespiratorytractsamplesusingthebiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelintheimmunocompromisedhost
AT sakatakennethk comparisonofrespiratorypathogendetectioninupperversuslowerrespiratorytractsamplesusingthebiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelintheimmunocompromisedhost
AT saeedali comparisonofrespiratorypathogendetectioninupperversuslowerrespiratorytractsamplesusingthebiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelintheimmunocompromisedhost
AT mullonjohnj comparisonofrespiratorypathogendetectioninupperversuslowerrespiratorytractsamplesusingthebiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelintheimmunocompromisedhost
AT grysthomase comparisonofrespiratorypathogendetectioninupperversuslowerrespiratorytractsamplesusingthebiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelintheimmunocompromisedhost
AT limperandrewh comparisonofrespiratorypathogendetectioninupperversuslowerrespiratorytractsamplesusingthebiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelintheimmunocompromisedhost
AT binnickermatthewj comparisonofrespiratorypathogendetectioninupperversuslowerrespiratorytractsamplesusingthebiofirefilmarrayrespiratorypanelintheimmunocompromisedhost