Cargando…

Reliability and Physiological Interpretation of Pulmonary Gas Exchange by “Circulatory Equivalents” in Chronic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND: Peak ratios of pulmonary gas‐exchange to ventilation during exercise ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , termed “circulatory equivalents”) are sensitive to heart failure (HF) severity, likely reflecting low and/or poorly distributed pulmonary perfusion. We tested whether peak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Chunting, Rossiter, Harry B., Porszasz, Janos, Bowen, T. Scott, Witte, Klaus K., Stringer, William W., Casaburi, Richard, Hansen, James E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008072
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Peak ratios of pulmonary gas‐exchange to ventilation during exercise ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , termed “circulatory equivalents”) are sensitive to heart failure (HF) severity, likely reflecting low and/or poorly distributed pulmonary perfusion. We tested whether peak [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] would: (1) distinguish HF patients from controls; (2) be independent of incremental exercise protocol; and (3) correlate with lactate threshold (LT) and ventilatory compensation point (VCP), respectively. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty‐four HF patients (61±11 years) with reduced ejection fraction (31±8%) and 11 controls (63±7 years) performed ramp‐incremental cycle ergometry. Eighteen HF patients also performed slow (5±1 W/min), medium (9±4 W/min), and fast (19±6 W/min) ramps. Peak [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] from X‐Y plot, and LT and VCP from 9‐panel plot, were determined by 2 independent, blinded, assessors. Peak [Formula: see text] (31.2±4.4 versus 41.8±4.8 mL/L; P<0.0001) and [Formula: see text] (29.3±3.0 versus 36.9±4.0 mL/L; P<0.0001) were lower in HF than controls. Within individuals, there was no difference across 3 ramp rates in peak [Formula: see text] (P=0.62) or [Formula: see text] (P=0.97). Coefficient of variation (CV) in peak [Formula: see text] was lower than for LT (5.1±2.1% versus 8.2±3.7%; P=0.014), and coefficient of variation in peak [Formula: see text] was lower than for VCP (3.3±1.8% versus 8.7±4.2%; P<0.001). In all participants, peak [Formula: see text] was correlated with, but occurred earlier than, LT (r (2)=0.94; mean bias, −0.11 L/min), and peak [Formula: see text] was correlated with, but occurred earlier than, VCP (r (2)=0.98; mean bias −0.08 L/min). CONCLUSIONS: Peak circulatory equivalents during exercise are strongly associated with (but not identical to) LT and VCP. Peak circulatory equivalents are reliable, objective, effort‐independent indices of gas‐exchange abnormality in HF.