Cargando…

Mechanical circulatory support is effective to treat pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates disqualified due to unacceptable pulmonary vascular resistance

INTRODUCTION: High pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) candidates is a risk factor of right ventricle failure after the procedure. However, the increase of PVR may be a consequence of the life-threatening deterioration of the left ventricle function. The use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zakliczyński, Michał, Pacholewicz, Jerzy, Copik, Izabela, Maruszewski, Marcin, Hrapkowicz, Tomasz, Przybylski, Roman, Zembala, Marian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681957
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2018.74671
_version_ 1783315567475687424
author Zakliczyński, Michał
Pacholewicz, Jerzy
Copik, Izabela
Maruszewski, Marcin
Hrapkowicz, Tomasz
Przybylski, Roman
Zembala, Marian
author_facet Zakliczyński, Michał
Pacholewicz, Jerzy
Copik, Izabela
Maruszewski, Marcin
Hrapkowicz, Tomasz
Przybylski, Roman
Zembala, Marian
author_sort Zakliczyński, Michał
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: High pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) candidates is a risk factor of right ventricle failure after the procedure. However, the increase of PVR may be a consequence of the life-threatening deterioration of the left ventricle function. The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) seems to be the best solution, but it is reimbursed only in active OHT candidates. AIM: We performed a retrospective analysis of MCS effectiveness in maintaining PVR at values accepted for OHT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Starting from the year 2008 we identified 6 patients (all males, 42.8 ±17 years old) with dilated (n = 3), ischemic (n = 2), and restrictive cardiomyopathy (n = 1) in whom MCS – pulsatile left ventricle assist device (LVAD, n = 4), continuous flow LVAD (n = 1), and pulsatile biventricular assist device (BIVAD, n = 1) – was used at a time when PVR was unacceptable for OHT, and the reversibility test with nitroprusside was negative. After an average time of support of 261 ±129 days they were all transplanted. RESULTS: Right heart catheterization (RHC) results before MCS implantation were as follows: pulmonary artery systolic, diastolic, and mean pressure (PAPs/d/m) 60 ±20/28 ±7/40 ±11 mm Hg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) 21 ±7 mm Hg, transpulmonary gradient (TPG) 19 ±7 mm Hg, cardiac output (CO) 3.6 ±0.8 l/min, PVR 5.7 ±2.1 Wood units (WU). Right heart catheterization results during MCS therapy were as follows: PAPs/d/s 27 ±11/12 ±4/17 ±6 mm Hg, PCWP 10 ±4 mm Hg, TPG 7 ±4 mm Hg, CO 5.1 ±0.7 l/min, PVR 1.4 ±0.6 WU. None of the patients experienced right ventricle failure after OHT with only one early loss due to multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical circulatory support is an effective method of pulmonary hypertension treatment for patients disqualified for OHT due to high PVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5907613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59076132018-04-20 Mechanical circulatory support is effective to treat pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates disqualified due to unacceptable pulmonary vascular resistance Zakliczyński, Michał Pacholewicz, Jerzy Copik, Izabela Maruszewski, Marcin Hrapkowicz, Tomasz Przybylski, Roman Zembala, Marian Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: High pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) candidates is a risk factor of right ventricle failure after the procedure. However, the increase of PVR may be a consequence of the life-threatening deterioration of the left ventricle function. The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) seems to be the best solution, but it is reimbursed only in active OHT candidates. AIM: We performed a retrospective analysis of MCS effectiveness in maintaining PVR at values accepted for OHT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Starting from the year 2008 we identified 6 patients (all males, 42.8 ±17 years old) with dilated (n = 3), ischemic (n = 2), and restrictive cardiomyopathy (n = 1) in whom MCS – pulsatile left ventricle assist device (LVAD, n = 4), continuous flow LVAD (n = 1), and pulsatile biventricular assist device (BIVAD, n = 1) – was used at a time when PVR was unacceptable for OHT, and the reversibility test with nitroprusside was negative. After an average time of support of 261 ±129 days they were all transplanted. RESULTS: Right heart catheterization (RHC) results before MCS implantation were as follows: pulmonary artery systolic, diastolic, and mean pressure (PAPs/d/m) 60 ±20/28 ±7/40 ±11 mm Hg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) 21 ±7 mm Hg, transpulmonary gradient (TPG) 19 ±7 mm Hg, cardiac output (CO) 3.6 ±0.8 l/min, PVR 5.7 ±2.1 Wood units (WU). Right heart catheterization results during MCS therapy were as follows: PAPs/d/s 27 ±11/12 ±4/17 ±6 mm Hg, PCWP 10 ±4 mm Hg, TPG 7 ±4 mm Hg, CO 5.1 ±0.7 l/min, PVR 1.4 ±0.6 WU. None of the patients experienced right ventricle failure after OHT with only one early loss due to multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical circulatory support is an effective method of pulmonary hypertension treatment for patients disqualified for OHT due to high PVR. Termedia Publishing House 2018-03-28 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5907613/ /pubmed/29681957 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2018.74671 Text en Copyright © 2018 Polish Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons (Polskie Towarzystwo KardioTorakochirurgów) and the editors of the Polish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zakliczyński, Michał
Pacholewicz, Jerzy
Copik, Izabela
Maruszewski, Marcin
Hrapkowicz, Tomasz
Przybylski, Roman
Zembala, Marian
Mechanical circulatory support is effective to treat pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates disqualified due to unacceptable pulmonary vascular resistance
title Mechanical circulatory support is effective to treat pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates disqualified due to unacceptable pulmonary vascular resistance
title_full Mechanical circulatory support is effective to treat pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates disqualified due to unacceptable pulmonary vascular resistance
title_fullStr Mechanical circulatory support is effective to treat pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates disqualified due to unacceptable pulmonary vascular resistance
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical circulatory support is effective to treat pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates disqualified due to unacceptable pulmonary vascular resistance
title_short Mechanical circulatory support is effective to treat pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates disqualified due to unacceptable pulmonary vascular resistance
title_sort mechanical circulatory support is effective to treat pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates disqualified due to unacceptable pulmonary vascular resistance
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29681957
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2018.74671
work_keys_str_mv AT zakliczynskimichał mechanicalcirculatorysupportiseffectivetotreatpulmonaryhypertensioninhearttransplantcandidatesdisqualifiedduetounacceptablepulmonaryvascularresistance
AT pacholewiczjerzy mechanicalcirculatorysupportiseffectivetotreatpulmonaryhypertensioninhearttransplantcandidatesdisqualifiedduetounacceptablepulmonaryvascularresistance
AT copikizabela mechanicalcirculatorysupportiseffectivetotreatpulmonaryhypertensioninhearttransplantcandidatesdisqualifiedduetounacceptablepulmonaryvascularresistance
AT maruszewskimarcin mechanicalcirculatorysupportiseffectivetotreatpulmonaryhypertensioninhearttransplantcandidatesdisqualifiedduetounacceptablepulmonaryvascularresistance
AT hrapkowicztomasz mechanicalcirculatorysupportiseffectivetotreatpulmonaryhypertensioninhearttransplantcandidatesdisqualifiedduetounacceptablepulmonaryvascularresistance
AT przybylskiroman mechanicalcirculatorysupportiseffectivetotreatpulmonaryhypertensioninhearttransplantcandidatesdisqualifiedduetounacceptablepulmonaryvascularresistance
AT zembalamarian mechanicalcirculatorysupportiseffectivetotreatpulmonaryhypertensioninhearttransplantcandidatesdisqualifiedduetounacceptablepulmonaryvascularresistance