Cargando…
Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements
BACKGROUND: Muscle fatigue induced by repetitive movements contributes to the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Men and women respond differently to muscle fatigue during isometric single-joint efforts, but sex differences during dynamic multi-joint tasks have not been clearly identified. Mo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29673397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9 |
_version_ | 1783315588027777024 |
---|---|
author | Bouffard, Jason Yang, Chen Begon, Mickael Côté, Julie |
author_facet | Bouffard, Jason Yang, Chen Begon, Mickael Côté, Julie |
author_sort | Bouffard, Jason |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Muscle fatigue induced by repetitive movements contributes to the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Men and women respond differently to muscle fatigue during isometric single-joint efforts, but sex differences during dynamic multi-joint tasks have not been clearly identified. Moreover, most studies comparing men and women during fatigue development assessed endurance time. However, none evaluated sex differences in kinematic adaptations to fatigue during multi-joint dynamic tasks. The objective of the study was to compare how men and women adapt their upper body kinematics during a fatiguing repetitive pointing task. METHODS: Forty men and 41 women performed repetitive pointing movements (one per second) between two targets while maintaining their elbow elevated at shoulder height. The task ended when participants rated a perceived level of fatigue of 8/10. Trunk, humerothoracic, and elbow angles were compared between the first and last 30 s of the experiment and between men and women. Linear positions of the index finger (distance from the target) and the elbow (arm elevation) as well as movement timing were documented as task performance measures. RESULTS: Men (7.4 ± 3.2 min) and women (8.3 ± 4.5 min) performed the repetitive pointing task for a similar duration. For both sex groups, trunk range of motion increased with fatigue while shoulder’s and elbow’s decreased. Moreover, participants modified their trunk posture to compensate for the decreased humerothoracic elevation. Movements at all joints also became more variable with fatigue. However, of the 24 joint angle variables assessed, only two Sex × Fatigue interactions were observed. Although average humerothoracic elevation angle decreased in both subgroups, this decrease was greater in men (standardized response mean [SRM] − 1.63) than in women (SRM − 1.44). Moreover, the movement-to-movement variability of humerothoracic elevation angle increased only in women (SRM 0.42). CONCLUSION: Despite many similarities between men’s and women’s response to fatigue induced by repetitive pointing movements, some sex differences were observed. Those subtle differences may indicate that men’s shoulder muscles were more fatigued than women’s despite a similar level of perceived exertion. They may also indicate that men and women do not adapt the exact same way to a similar fatigue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5907702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59077022018-04-30 Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements Bouffard, Jason Yang, Chen Begon, Mickael Côté, Julie Biol Sex Differ Research BACKGROUND: Muscle fatigue induced by repetitive movements contributes to the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Men and women respond differently to muscle fatigue during isometric single-joint efforts, but sex differences during dynamic multi-joint tasks have not been clearly identified. Moreover, most studies comparing men and women during fatigue development assessed endurance time. However, none evaluated sex differences in kinematic adaptations to fatigue during multi-joint dynamic tasks. The objective of the study was to compare how men and women adapt their upper body kinematics during a fatiguing repetitive pointing task. METHODS: Forty men and 41 women performed repetitive pointing movements (one per second) between two targets while maintaining their elbow elevated at shoulder height. The task ended when participants rated a perceived level of fatigue of 8/10. Trunk, humerothoracic, and elbow angles were compared between the first and last 30 s of the experiment and between men and women. Linear positions of the index finger (distance from the target) and the elbow (arm elevation) as well as movement timing were documented as task performance measures. RESULTS: Men (7.4 ± 3.2 min) and women (8.3 ± 4.5 min) performed the repetitive pointing task for a similar duration. For both sex groups, trunk range of motion increased with fatigue while shoulder’s and elbow’s decreased. Moreover, participants modified their trunk posture to compensate for the decreased humerothoracic elevation. Movements at all joints also became more variable with fatigue. However, of the 24 joint angle variables assessed, only two Sex × Fatigue interactions were observed. Although average humerothoracic elevation angle decreased in both subgroups, this decrease was greater in men (standardized response mean [SRM] − 1.63) than in women (SRM − 1.44). Moreover, the movement-to-movement variability of humerothoracic elevation angle increased only in women (SRM 0.42). CONCLUSION: Despite many similarities between men’s and women’s response to fatigue induced by repetitive pointing movements, some sex differences were observed. Those subtle differences may indicate that men’s shoulder muscles were more fatigued than women’s despite a similar level of perceived exertion. They may also indicate that men and women do not adapt the exact same way to a similar fatigue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5907702/ /pubmed/29673397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Bouffard, Jason Yang, Chen Begon, Mickael Côté, Julie Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements |
title | Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements |
title_full | Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements |
title_short | Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements |
title_sort | sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29673397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bouffardjason sexdifferencesinkinematicadaptationstomusclefatigueinducedbyrepetitiveupperlimbmovements AT yangchen sexdifferencesinkinematicadaptationstomusclefatigueinducedbyrepetitiveupperlimbmovements AT begonmickael sexdifferencesinkinematicadaptationstomusclefatigueinducedbyrepetitiveupperlimbmovements AT cotejulie sexdifferencesinkinematicadaptationstomusclefatigueinducedbyrepetitiveupperlimbmovements |