Cargando…

Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements

BACKGROUND: Muscle fatigue induced by repetitive movements contributes to the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Men and women respond differently to muscle fatigue during isometric single-joint efforts, but sex differences during dynamic multi-joint tasks have not been clearly identified. Mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouffard, Jason, Yang, Chen, Begon, Mickael, Côté, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29673397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9
_version_ 1783315588027777024
author Bouffard, Jason
Yang, Chen
Begon, Mickael
Côté, Julie
author_facet Bouffard, Jason
Yang, Chen
Begon, Mickael
Côté, Julie
author_sort Bouffard, Jason
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Muscle fatigue induced by repetitive movements contributes to the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Men and women respond differently to muscle fatigue during isometric single-joint efforts, but sex differences during dynamic multi-joint tasks have not been clearly identified. Moreover, most studies comparing men and women during fatigue development assessed endurance time. However, none evaluated sex differences in kinematic adaptations to fatigue during multi-joint dynamic tasks. The objective of the study was to compare how men and women adapt their upper body kinematics during a fatiguing repetitive pointing task. METHODS: Forty men and 41 women performed repetitive pointing movements (one per second) between two targets while maintaining their elbow elevated at shoulder height. The task ended when participants rated a perceived level of fatigue of 8/10. Trunk, humerothoracic, and elbow angles were compared between the first and last 30 s of the experiment and between men and women. Linear positions of the index finger (distance from the target) and the elbow (arm elevation) as well as movement timing were documented as task performance measures. RESULTS: Men (7.4 ± 3.2 min) and women (8.3 ± 4.5 min) performed the repetitive pointing task for a similar duration. For both sex groups, trunk range of motion increased with fatigue while shoulder’s and elbow’s decreased. Moreover, participants modified their trunk posture to compensate for the decreased humerothoracic elevation. Movements at all joints also became more variable with fatigue. However, of the 24 joint angle variables assessed, only two Sex × Fatigue interactions were observed. Although average humerothoracic elevation angle decreased in both subgroups, this decrease was greater in men (standardized response mean [SRM] − 1.63) than in women (SRM − 1.44). Moreover, the movement-to-movement variability of humerothoracic elevation angle increased only in women (SRM 0.42). CONCLUSION: Despite many similarities between men’s and women’s response to fatigue induced by repetitive pointing movements, some sex differences were observed. Those subtle differences may indicate that men’s shoulder muscles were more fatigued than women’s despite a similar level of perceived exertion. They may also indicate that men and women do not adapt the exact same way to a similar fatigue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5907702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59077022018-04-30 Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements Bouffard, Jason Yang, Chen Begon, Mickael Côté, Julie Biol Sex Differ Research BACKGROUND: Muscle fatigue induced by repetitive movements contributes to the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Men and women respond differently to muscle fatigue during isometric single-joint efforts, but sex differences during dynamic multi-joint tasks have not been clearly identified. Moreover, most studies comparing men and women during fatigue development assessed endurance time. However, none evaluated sex differences in kinematic adaptations to fatigue during multi-joint dynamic tasks. The objective of the study was to compare how men and women adapt their upper body kinematics during a fatiguing repetitive pointing task. METHODS: Forty men and 41 women performed repetitive pointing movements (one per second) between two targets while maintaining their elbow elevated at shoulder height. The task ended when participants rated a perceived level of fatigue of 8/10. Trunk, humerothoracic, and elbow angles were compared between the first and last 30 s of the experiment and between men and women. Linear positions of the index finger (distance from the target) and the elbow (arm elevation) as well as movement timing were documented as task performance measures. RESULTS: Men (7.4 ± 3.2 min) and women (8.3 ± 4.5 min) performed the repetitive pointing task for a similar duration. For both sex groups, trunk range of motion increased with fatigue while shoulder’s and elbow’s decreased. Moreover, participants modified their trunk posture to compensate for the decreased humerothoracic elevation. Movements at all joints also became more variable with fatigue. However, of the 24 joint angle variables assessed, only two Sex × Fatigue interactions were observed. Although average humerothoracic elevation angle decreased in both subgroups, this decrease was greater in men (standardized response mean [SRM] − 1.63) than in women (SRM − 1.44). Moreover, the movement-to-movement variability of humerothoracic elevation angle increased only in women (SRM 0.42). CONCLUSION: Despite many similarities between men’s and women’s response to fatigue induced by repetitive pointing movements, some sex differences were observed. Those subtle differences may indicate that men’s shoulder muscles were more fatigued than women’s despite a similar level of perceived exertion. They may also indicate that men and women do not adapt the exact same way to a similar fatigue. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5907702/ /pubmed/29673397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Bouffard, Jason
Yang, Chen
Begon, Mickael
Côté, Julie
Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements
title Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements
title_full Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements
title_fullStr Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements
title_short Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements
title_sort sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29673397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-018-0175-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bouffardjason sexdifferencesinkinematicadaptationstomusclefatigueinducedbyrepetitiveupperlimbmovements
AT yangchen sexdifferencesinkinematicadaptationstomusclefatigueinducedbyrepetitiveupperlimbmovements
AT begonmickael sexdifferencesinkinematicadaptationstomusclefatigueinducedbyrepetitiveupperlimbmovements
AT cotejulie sexdifferencesinkinematicadaptationstomusclefatigueinducedbyrepetitiveupperlimbmovements