Cargando…

Development and validation of a brief general and sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire and assessment of athletes’ nutrition knowledge

BACKGROUND: The Nutrition for Sport Knowledge Questionnaire (NSKQ) is an 89-item, valid and reliable measure of sports nutrition knowledge (SNK). It takes 25 min to complete and has been subject to low completion and response rates. The aim of this study was to develop an abridged version of the NSK...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trakman, Gina Louise, Forsyth, Adrienne, Hoye, Russell, Belski, Regina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0223-1
_version_ 1783315596234981376
author Trakman, Gina Louise
Forsyth, Adrienne
Hoye, Russell
Belski, Regina
author_facet Trakman, Gina Louise
Forsyth, Adrienne
Hoye, Russell
Belski, Regina
author_sort Trakman, Gina Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Nutrition for Sport Knowledge Questionnaire (NSKQ) is an 89-item, valid and reliable measure of sports nutrition knowledge (SNK). It takes 25 min to complete and has been subject to low completion and response rates. The aim of this study was to develop an abridged version of the NSKQ (A-NSKQ) and compare response rates, completion rates and NK scores of the NSKQ and A-NSKQ. METHODS: Rasch analysis was used for the questionnaire validation. The sample (n = 181) was the same sample that was used in the validation of the full-length NSKQ. Construct validity was assessed using the known-group comparisons method. Temporal stability was assessed using the test-retest reliability method. NK assessment was cross-sectional; responses were collected electronically from members of one non-elite Australian football (AF) and netball club, using Qualtrics Software (Qualtrics, Provo, UT). RESULTS: Validation - The A-NSKQ has 37 items that assess general (n = 17) and sports (n = 20) nutrition knowledge (NK). Both sections are unidimensional (Perc5% = 2.84% [general] and 3.41% [sport]). Both sections fit the Rasch Model (overall-interaction statistic mean (SD) = − 0.15 ± 0.96 [general] and 0.22 ± 1.11 [sport]; overall-person interaction statistic mean (SD) = − 0.11 ± 0.61 [general] and 0.08 ± 0.73 [sport]; Chi-Square probability = 0.308 [general] and 0.283 [sport]). Test-retest reliability was confirmed (r = 0.8, P < 0.001 [general] and r = 0.7, P < 0.001 [sport]). Construct validity was demonstrated (nutrition students = 77% versus non-nutrition students = 60%, P < 0.001 [general] and nutrition students = 60% versus non-nutrition students = 40%, P < 0.001 [sport]. Assessment of NK - 177 usable survey responses from were returned. Response rates were low (7%) but completion rates were high (85%). NK scores on the A-NSKQ (46%) are comparable to results obtained in similar cohorts on the NSKQ (49%). The A-NSKQ took on average 12 min to complete, which is around half the time taken to complete the NSKQ (25 min). CONCLUSIONS: The A-NSKQ is a valid and reliable, brief questionnaire designed to assess general NK (GNK) and SNK. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12970-018-0223-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5907737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59077372018-04-30 Development and validation of a brief general and sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire and assessment of athletes’ nutrition knowledge Trakman, Gina Louise Forsyth, Adrienne Hoye, Russell Belski, Regina J Int Soc Sports Nutr Research Article BACKGROUND: The Nutrition for Sport Knowledge Questionnaire (NSKQ) is an 89-item, valid and reliable measure of sports nutrition knowledge (SNK). It takes 25 min to complete and has been subject to low completion and response rates. The aim of this study was to develop an abridged version of the NSKQ (A-NSKQ) and compare response rates, completion rates and NK scores of the NSKQ and A-NSKQ. METHODS: Rasch analysis was used for the questionnaire validation. The sample (n = 181) was the same sample that was used in the validation of the full-length NSKQ. Construct validity was assessed using the known-group comparisons method. Temporal stability was assessed using the test-retest reliability method. NK assessment was cross-sectional; responses were collected electronically from members of one non-elite Australian football (AF) and netball club, using Qualtrics Software (Qualtrics, Provo, UT). RESULTS: Validation - The A-NSKQ has 37 items that assess general (n = 17) and sports (n = 20) nutrition knowledge (NK). Both sections are unidimensional (Perc5% = 2.84% [general] and 3.41% [sport]). Both sections fit the Rasch Model (overall-interaction statistic mean (SD) = − 0.15 ± 0.96 [general] and 0.22 ± 1.11 [sport]; overall-person interaction statistic mean (SD) = − 0.11 ± 0.61 [general] and 0.08 ± 0.73 [sport]; Chi-Square probability = 0.308 [general] and 0.283 [sport]). Test-retest reliability was confirmed (r = 0.8, P < 0.001 [general] and r = 0.7, P < 0.001 [sport]). Construct validity was demonstrated (nutrition students = 77% versus non-nutrition students = 60%, P < 0.001 [general] and nutrition students = 60% versus non-nutrition students = 40%, P < 0.001 [sport]. Assessment of NK - 177 usable survey responses from were returned. Response rates were low (7%) but completion rates were high (85%). NK scores on the A-NSKQ (46%) are comparable to results obtained in similar cohorts on the NSKQ (49%). The A-NSKQ took on average 12 min to complete, which is around half the time taken to complete the NSKQ (25 min). CONCLUSIONS: The A-NSKQ is a valid and reliable, brief questionnaire designed to assess general NK (GNK) and SNK. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12970-018-0223-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5907737/ /pubmed/29713248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0223-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Trakman, Gina Louise
Forsyth, Adrienne
Hoye, Russell
Belski, Regina
Development and validation of a brief general and sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire and assessment of athletes’ nutrition knowledge
title Development and validation of a brief general and sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire and assessment of athletes’ nutrition knowledge
title_full Development and validation of a brief general and sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire and assessment of athletes’ nutrition knowledge
title_fullStr Development and validation of a brief general and sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire and assessment of athletes’ nutrition knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a brief general and sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire and assessment of athletes’ nutrition knowledge
title_short Development and validation of a brief general and sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire and assessment of athletes’ nutrition knowledge
title_sort development and validation of a brief general and sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire and assessment of athletes’ nutrition knowledge
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0223-1
work_keys_str_mv AT trakmanginalouise developmentandvalidationofabriefgeneralandsportsnutritionknowledgequestionnaireandassessmentofathletesnutritionknowledge
AT forsythadrienne developmentandvalidationofabriefgeneralandsportsnutritionknowledgequestionnaireandassessmentofathletesnutritionknowledge
AT hoyerussell developmentandvalidationofabriefgeneralandsportsnutritionknowledgequestionnaireandassessmentofathletesnutritionknowledge
AT belskiregina developmentandvalidationofabriefgeneralandsportsnutritionknowledgequestionnaireandassessmentofathletesnutritionknowledge