Cargando…

A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol of neoadjuvant treatments for patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy for gastric cancer patients. Neoadjuvant treatments as the administration of therapeutic agents before a main treatment gained in more and more attention. However, the role of n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Long, Bo, Yu, Ze-yuan, Li, Qiong, Du, Heng-rui, Wang, Zhen-jiang, Zhan, Hao, Jiao, Zuo-yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5908618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29642200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010392
_version_ 1783315746316615680
author Long, Bo
Yu, Ze-yuan
Li, Qiong
Du, Heng-rui
Wang, Zhen-jiang
Zhan, Hao
Jiao, Zuo-yi
author_facet Long, Bo
Yu, Ze-yuan
Li, Qiong
Du, Heng-rui
Wang, Zhen-jiang
Zhan, Hao
Jiao, Zuo-yi
author_sort Long, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy for gastric cancer patients. Neoadjuvant treatments as the administration of therapeutic agents before a main treatment gained in more and more attention. However, the role of neoadjuvant treatments is still controversial. The main aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to assess the relative efficacy of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens for gastric cancer using network meta-analysis method. METHODS: We will search 5 electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs compared the efficacy differences of surgery alone (S), preoperative chemotherapy follow by surgery (CTS), preoperative radiotherapy follow by surgery (RTS), and preoperative chemoradiotherapy follow by surgery (CRTS) for patients with gastric cancer. The risk of bias tool from the Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0 will be used to assess the risk of bias of RCTs, and the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-RCTs. Data will be analyzed using R-3.4.1 software. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The results of present network meta-analysis will estimate the relative efficacy among all interventions and rank the interventions even if head-to-head comparisons are lacking and will provide more evidence for clinicians, researchers, and patients in the management of gastric cancer. Protocol registration number: CRD42017074956
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5908618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59086182018-04-30 A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol of neoadjuvant treatments for patients with gastric cancer Long, Bo Yu, Ze-yuan Li, Qiong Du, Heng-rui Wang, Zhen-jiang Zhan, Hao Jiao, Zuo-yi Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy for gastric cancer patients. Neoadjuvant treatments as the administration of therapeutic agents before a main treatment gained in more and more attention. However, the role of neoadjuvant treatments is still controversial. The main aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to assess the relative efficacy of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens for gastric cancer using network meta-analysis method. METHODS: We will search 5 electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs compared the efficacy differences of surgery alone (S), preoperative chemotherapy follow by surgery (CTS), preoperative radiotherapy follow by surgery (RTS), and preoperative chemoradiotherapy follow by surgery (CRTS) for patients with gastric cancer. The risk of bias tool from the Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0 will be used to assess the risk of bias of RCTs, and the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-RCTs. Data will be analyzed using R-3.4.1 software. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The results of present network meta-analysis will estimate the relative efficacy among all interventions and rank the interventions even if head-to-head comparisons are lacking and will provide more evidence for clinicians, researchers, and patients in the management of gastric cancer. Protocol registration number: CRD42017074956 Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5908618/ /pubmed/29642200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010392 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Long, Bo
Yu, Ze-yuan
Li, Qiong
Du, Heng-rui
Wang, Zhen-jiang
Zhan, Hao
Jiao, Zuo-yi
A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol of neoadjuvant treatments for patients with gastric cancer
title A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol of neoadjuvant treatments for patients with gastric cancer
title_full A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol of neoadjuvant treatments for patients with gastric cancer
title_fullStr A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol of neoadjuvant treatments for patients with gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol of neoadjuvant treatments for patients with gastric cancer
title_short A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol of neoadjuvant treatments for patients with gastric cancer
title_sort systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol of neoadjuvant treatments for patients with gastric cancer
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5908618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29642200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010392
work_keys_str_mv AT longbo asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT yuzeyuan asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT liqiong asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT duhengrui asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT wangzhenjiang asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT zhanhao asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT jiaozuoyi asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT longbo systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT yuzeyuan systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT liqiong systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT duhengrui systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT wangzhenjiang systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT zhanhao systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer
AT jiaozuoyi systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocolofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforpatientswithgastriccancer