Cargando…
De-escalation of antifungal treatment in critically ill patients with suspected invasive Candida infection: incidence, associated factors, and safety
BACKGROUND: Antifungal treatment is common in critically ill patients, but only a small proportion of patients receiving antifungals have a proven fungal infection. However, antifungal treatment has side effects such as toxicity, emergence of resistance, and high cost. Moreover, empirical antifungal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5908771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29675561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0392-8 |
_version_ | 1783315758601732096 |
---|---|
author | Jaffal, Karim Poissy, Julien Rouze, Anahita Preau, Sébastien Sendid, Boualem Cornu, Marjorie Nseir, Saad |
author_facet | Jaffal, Karim Poissy, Julien Rouze, Anahita Preau, Sébastien Sendid, Boualem Cornu, Marjorie Nseir, Saad |
author_sort | Jaffal, Karim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Antifungal treatment is common in critically ill patients, but only a small proportion of patients receiving antifungals have a proven fungal infection. However, antifungal treatment has side effects such as toxicity, emergence of resistance, and high cost. Moreover, empirical antifungal treatment is still a matter for debate in these patients. Our study aimed to determine the incidence, associated factors, and safety of de-escalation of antifungals in critically ill patients. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a 30-bed mixed ICU, from January 2012 through January 2013. Patients hospitalized for > 5 days and treated with antifungals for first suspected or proven invasive Candida infection were included. Exclusion criteria were prophylactic antifungals, suspected invasive aspergillosis, and neutropenia. De-escalation was defined as switch from initial systemic antifungals (except fluconazole) to triazoles, or stopping initial drugs within the 5 days following their initiation. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety patients were included. Antifungal treatment was empirical, preemptive, and targeted in 55, 27, and 24% of study patients, respectively. Caspofungin (53%), fluconazole (43%), voriconazole (4%), and liposomal amphotericin B (0.5%) were the more frequently used antifungals. De-escalation was performed in 38 (20%) patients. Invasive mechanical ventilation was independently associated with lower rates of de-escalation (OR 0.25 [95% CI 0.08–0.85], p = 0.013). Total duration of antifungal treatment was significantly shorter in patients with de-escalation, compared with those with no de-escalation (med [IQR] 6 (5, 18) vs. 13 days (7, 25), p = 0.023). No significant difference was found in duration of mechanical ventilation (22 [5–31] vs. 20 days [10–35], p = 0.43), length of ICU stay (25 [14–40) vs. 25 days [11–40], p = 0.99), ICU mortality (45 vs. 59%, p = 0.13), or 1-year mortality (55 vs. 64%, p = 0.33) between patients with de-escalation and those with no de-escalation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: De-escalation was performed in 20% of patients receiving systemic antifungals for suspected or proven invasive Candida infection. Mechanical ventilation was independently associated with lower rates of de-escalation. De-escalation of antifungal treatment seems to be safe in critically ill patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5908771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59087712018-04-30 De-escalation of antifungal treatment in critically ill patients with suspected invasive Candida infection: incidence, associated factors, and safety Jaffal, Karim Poissy, Julien Rouze, Anahita Preau, Sébastien Sendid, Boualem Cornu, Marjorie Nseir, Saad Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Antifungal treatment is common in critically ill patients, but only a small proportion of patients receiving antifungals have a proven fungal infection. However, antifungal treatment has side effects such as toxicity, emergence of resistance, and high cost. Moreover, empirical antifungal treatment is still a matter for debate in these patients. Our study aimed to determine the incidence, associated factors, and safety of de-escalation of antifungals in critically ill patients. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a 30-bed mixed ICU, from January 2012 through January 2013. Patients hospitalized for > 5 days and treated with antifungals for first suspected or proven invasive Candida infection were included. Exclusion criteria were prophylactic antifungals, suspected invasive aspergillosis, and neutropenia. De-escalation was defined as switch from initial systemic antifungals (except fluconazole) to triazoles, or stopping initial drugs within the 5 days following their initiation. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety patients were included. Antifungal treatment was empirical, preemptive, and targeted in 55, 27, and 24% of study patients, respectively. Caspofungin (53%), fluconazole (43%), voriconazole (4%), and liposomal amphotericin B (0.5%) were the more frequently used antifungals. De-escalation was performed in 38 (20%) patients. Invasive mechanical ventilation was independently associated with lower rates of de-escalation (OR 0.25 [95% CI 0.08–0.85], p = 0.013). Total duration of antifungal treatment was significantly shorter in patients with de-escalation, compared with those with no de-escalation (med [IQR] 6 (5, 18) vs. 13 days (7, 25), p = 0.023). No significant difference was found in duration of mechanical ventilation (22 [5–31] vs. 20 days [10–35], p = 0.43), length of ICU stay (25 [14–40) vs. 25 days [11–40], p = 0.99), ICU mortality (45 vs. 59%, p = 0.13), or 1-year mortality (55 vs. 64%, p = 0.33) between patients with de-escalation and those with no de-escalation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: De-escalation was performed in 20% of patients receiving systemic antifungals for suspected or proven invasive Candida infection. Mechanical ventilation was independently associated with lower rates of de-escalation. De-escalation of antifungal treatment seems to be safe in critically ill patients. Springer International Publishing 2018-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5908771/ /pubmed/29675561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0392-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Jaffal, Karim Poissy, Julien Rouze, Anahita Preau, Sébastien Sendid, Boualem Cornu, Marjorie Nseir, Saad De-escalation of antifungal treatment in critically ill patients with suspected invasive Candida infection: incidence, associated factors, and safety |
title | De-escalation of antifungal treatment in critically ill patients with suspected invasive Candida infection: incidence, associated factors, and safety |
title_full | De-escalation of antifungal treatment in critically ill patients with suspected invasive Candida infection: incidence, associated factors, and safety |
title_fullStr | De-escalation of antifungal treatment in critically ill patients with suspected invasive Candida infection: incidence, associated factors, and safety |
title_full_unstemmed | De-escalation of antifungal treatment in critically ill patients with suspected invasive Candida infection: incidence, associated factors, and safety |
title_short | De-escalation of antifungal treatment in critically ill patients with suspected invasive Candida infection: incidence, associated factors, and safety |
title_sort | de-escalation of antifungal treatment in critically ill patients with suspected invasive candida infection: incidence, associated factors, and safety |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5908771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29675561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0392-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaffalkarim deescalationofantifungaltreatmentincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinvasivecandidainfectionincidenceassociatedfactorsandsafety AT poissyjulien deescalationofantifungaltreatmentincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinvasivecandidainfectionincidenceassociatedfactorsandsafety AT rouzeanahita deescalationofantifungaltreatmentincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinvasivecandidainfectionincidenceassociatedfactorsandsafety AT preausebastien deescalationofantifungaltreatmentincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinvasivecandidainfectionincidenceassociatedfactorsandsafety AT sendidboualem deescalationofantifungaltreatmentincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinvasivecandidainfectionincidenceassociatedfactorsandsafety AT cornumarjorie deescalationofantifungaltreatmentincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinvasivecandidainfectionincidenceassociatedfactorsandsafety AT nseirsaad deescalationofantifungaltreatmentincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedinvasivecandidainfectionincidenceassociatedfactorsandsafety |