Cargando…

The known-groups validity of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an accelerometer in people with subacute stroke

[Purpose] This study aimed to assess the known-groups validity of the estimated metabolic equivalents during physical activities using accelerometer, Active Style Pro HJA 350-IT, in people with subacute stroke. [Subjects and Methods] Ten participants with subacute stroke and ten healthy people perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shimizu, Natsuki, Hashidate, Hiroyuki, Ota, Tomohiro, Saito, Akihiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5908992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.507
_version_ 1783315809899118592
author Shimizu, Natsuki
Hashidate, Hiroyuki
Ota, Tomohiro
Saito, Akihiko
author_facet Shimizu, Natsuki
Hashidate, Hiroyuki
Ota, Tomohiro
Saito, Akihiko
author_sort Shimizu, Natsuki
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] This study aimed to assess the known-groups validity of the estimated metabolic equivalents during physical activities using accelerometer, Active Style Pro HJA 350-IT, in people with subacute stroke. [Subjects and Methods] Ten participants with subacute stroke and ten healthy people performed six activities (lying, sitting, standing, sitting with reaching task, standing with reaching task, and walking) and metabolic equivalents were estimated using the accelerometer during each activity. These estimated metabolic equivalents were compared with reported metabolic equivalents through compendiums or previous studies. Additionally, the estimated metabolic equivalents were compared between subacute stroke and healthy control participants. [Results] The estimated metabolic equivalents of both groups during maintaining posture showed significantly lower values in comparison with previous studies. There were no significant differences between the estimated metabolic equivalents during sitting with reaching tasks or standing with reaching tasks when compared with compendium metabolic equivalents across both groups. The estimated metabolic equivalents during walking were inevitable values significantly differed from previous study which conducted with stroke patients with lower gait abilities in both groups. [Conclusion] The estimated metabolic equivalents using accelerometer may be suitable to assess movement activity rather than motionless activity, and accelerometer demonstrated acceptable validity in people with subacute stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5908992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59089922018-04-27 The known-groups validity of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an accelerometer in people with subacute stroke Shimizu, Natsuki Hashidate, Hiroyuki Ota, Tomohiro Saito, Akihiko J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] This study aimed to assess the known-groups validity of the estimated metabolic equivalents during physical activities using accelerometer, Active Style Pro HJA 350-IT, in people with subacute stroke. [Subjects and Methods] Ten participants with subacute stroke and ten healthy people performed six activities (lying, sitting, standing, sitting with reaching task, standing with reaching task, and walking) and metabolic equivalents were estimated using the accelerometer during each activity. These estimated metabolic equivalents were compared with reported metabolic equivalents through compendiums or previous studies. Additionally, the estimated metabolic equivalents were compared between subacute stroke and healthy control participants. [Results] The estimated metabolic equivalents of both groups during maintaining posture showed significantly lower values in comparison with previous studies. There were no significant differences between the estimated metabolic equivalents during sitting with reaching tasks or standing with reaching tasks when compared with compendium metabolic equivalents across both groups. The estimated metabolic equivalents during walking were inevitable values significantly differed from previous study which conducted with stroke patients with lower gait abilities in both groups. [Conclusion] The estimated metabolic equivalents using accelerometer may be suitable to assess movement activity rather than motionless activity, and accelerometer demonstrated acceptable validity in people with subacute stroke. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2018-04-13 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5908992/ /pubmed/29706696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.507 Text en 2018©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Shimizu, Natsuki
Hashidate, Hiroyuki
Ota, Tomohiro
Saito, Akihiko
The known-groups validity of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an accelerometer in people with subacute stroke
title The known-groups validity of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an accelerometer in people with subacute stroke
title_full The known-groups validity of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an accelerometer in people with subacute stroke
title_fullStr The known-groups validity of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an accelerometer in people with subacute stroke
title_full_unstemmed The known-groups validity of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an accelerometer in people with subacute stroke
title_short The known-groups validity of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an accelerometer in people with subacute stroke
title_sort known-groups validity of intensity-based physical activity measurement using an accelerometer in people with subacute stroke
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5908992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.507
work_keys_str_mv AT shimizunatsuki theknowngroupsvalidityofintensitybasedphysicalactivitymeasurementusinganaccelerometerinpeoplewithsubacutestroke
AT hashidatehiroyuki theknowngroupsvalidityofintensitybasedphysicalactivitymeasurementusinganaccelerometerinpeoplewithsubacutestroke
AT otatomohiro theknowngroupsvalidityofintensitybasedphysicalactivitymeasurementusinganaccelerometerinpeoplewithsubacutestroke
AT saitoakihiko theknowngroupsvalidityofintensitybasedphysicalactivitymeasurementusinganaccelerometerinpeoplewithsubacutestroke
AT shimizunatsuki knowngroupsvalidityofintensitybasedphysicalactivitymeasurementusinganaccelerometerinpeoplewithsubacutestroke
AT hashidatehiroyuki knowngroupsvalidityofintensitybasedphysicalactivitymeasurementusinganaccelerometerinpeoplewithsubacutestroke
AT otatomohiro knowngroupsvalidityofintensitybasedphysicalactivitymeasurementusinganaccelerometerinpeoplewithsubacutestroke
AT saitoakihiko knowngroupsvalidityofintensitybasedphysicalactivitymeasurementusinganaccelerometerinpeoplewithsubacutestroke