Cargando…

New Bacterial Infection in the Prostate after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

BACKGROUND: The prostate is prone to infections. Hypothetically, bacteria can be inoculated into the prostate during a transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) and progress into chronic bacterial prostatitis. Therefore, we examined new bacterial infections in biopsied prostates after TRPB and whether they...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Yumi, Lee, Gilho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e126
_version_ 1783315834041532416
author Seo, Yumi
Lee, Gilho
author_facet Seo, Yumi
Lee, Gilho
author_sort Seo, Yumi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prostate is prone to infections. Hypothetically, bacteria can be inoculated into the prostate during a transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) and progress into chronic bacterial prostatitis. Therefore, we examined new bacterial infections in biopsied prostates after TRPB and whether they affect clinical characteristics in the biopsied patients. METHODS: Of men whose prostate cultures have been taken prior to TRPB, 105 men with bacteria-free benign prostate pathology underwent an additional repeated prostate culture within a year after TRPB. RESULTS: Twenty out of 105 men (19.05%) acquired new bacteria in their naïve prostates after TRPB. Except for one single case of Escherichia coli infection, 19 men had acquired gram-positive bacteria species. Between the culture-positive and negative groups, there were no significant differences in age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, white blood cell (WBC) counts in expressed prostatic secretion (EPS), prostate volume, symptom severities in Korean version of the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) questionnaire, and patient-specific risk factors for biopsy associated infectious complications. Additionally, the TRPB procedure increased the WBC counts in post-biopsy EPS (P = 0.031, McNemar test), but did not increase the serum PSA level and symptoms of NIH-CPSI in 20 men who acquired new bacteria after TRPB. CONCLUSION: The TRPB procedure was significantly associated with acquiring new bacterial infections in the biopsied prostate, but these localized bacteria did not affect patients' serum PSA level and symptoms after biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5909103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59091032018-04-23 New Bacterial Infection in the Prostate after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Seo, Yumi Lee, Gilho J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The prostate is prone to infections. Hypothetically, bacteria can be inoculated into the prostate during a transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) and progress into chronic bacterial prostatitis. Therefore, we examined new bacterial infections in biopsied prostates after TRPB and whether they affect clinical characteristics in the biopsied patients. METHODS: Of men whose prostate cultures have been taken prior to TRPB, 105 men with bacteria-free benign prostate pathology underwent an additional repeated prostate culture within a year after TRPB. RESULTS: Twenty out of 105 men (19.05%) acquired new bacteria in their naïve prostates after TRPB. Except for one single case of Escherichia coli infection, 19 men had acquired gram-positive bacteria species. Between the culture-positive and negative groups, there were no significant differences in age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, white blood cell (WBC) counts in expressed prostatic secretion (EPS), prostate volume, symptom severities in Korean version of the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) questionnaire, and patient-specific risk factors for biopsy associated infectious complications. Additionally, the TRPB procedure increased the WBC counts in post-biopsy EPS (P = 0.031, McNemar test), but did not increase the serum PSA level and symptoms of NIH-CPSI in 20 men who acquired new bacteria after TRPB. CONCLUSION: The TRPB procedure was significantly associated with acquiring new bacterial infections in the biopsied prostate, but these localized bacteria did not affect patients' serum PSA level and symptoms after biopsy. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2018-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5909103/ /pubmed/29686597 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e126 Text en © 2018 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Seo, Yumi
Lee, Gilho
New Bacterial Infection in the Prostate after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy
title New Bacterial Infection in the Prostate after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy
title_full New Bacterial Infection in the Prostate after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy
title_fullStr New Bacterial Infection in the Prostate after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy
title_full_unstemmed New Bacterial Infection in the Prostate after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy
title_short New Bacterial Infection in the Prostate after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy
title_sort new bacterial infection in the prostate after transrectal prostate biopsy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e126
work_keys_str_mv AT seoyumi newbacterialinfectionintheprostateaftertransrectalprostatebiopsy
AT leegilho newbacterialinfectionintheprostateaftertransrectalprostatebiopsy