Cargando…
Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
BACKGROUND: Current techniques for evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) commonly require phantom calibration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel algorithm for phantomless in vivo dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based assessment of BMD of the lumbar spine in comparison with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0017-2 |
_version_ | 1783315883843649536 |
---|---|
author | Booz, Christian Hofmann, Philipp C. Sedlmair, Martin Flohr, Thomas G. Schmidt, Bernhard D’Angelo, Tommaso Martin, Simon S. Lenga, Lukas Leithner, Doris Vogl, Thomas J. Wichmann, Julian L. |
author_facet | Booz, Christian Hofmann, Philipp C. Sedlmair, Martin Flohr, Thomas G. Schmidt, Bernhard D’Angelo, Tommaso Martin, Simon S. Lenga, Lukas Leithner, Doris Vogl, Thomas J. Wichmann, Julian L. |
author_sort | Booz, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current techniques for evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) commonly require phantom calibration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel algorithm for phantomless in vivo dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based assessment of BMD of the lumbar spine in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). METHODS: Data from clinically indicated DECT and DEXA examinations within two months comprising the lumbar spine of 47 patients were retrospectively evaluated. By using a novel automated dedicated post-processing algorithm for DECT, the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae L1–L4 was selected and analysed. Linear correlation was analysed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient for the comparison of the results from DECT and DEXA. RESULTS: A total of 186 lumbar vertebrae in 47 patients (mean age, 58 years; age range, 24–85 years) were analysed, 24 men (mean age, 55 years; age range, 24–85 years) and 23 women (mean age, 59 years; age range, 31–80 years). Mean BMD of L1–L4 determined with DEXA was 0.985 g/cm(2) and 20/47 patients (42.6%) showed an osteoporotic BMD (T score lower than – 2.5) of at least two vertebrae. Average DECT-based BMD of L1–L4 was 86.8 mg/cm(3). Regression analysis demonstrated a lack of correlation between DECT- and DEXA-based BMD values with a Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient r = 0.4205. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated post-processing of DECT data using a novel algorithm for retrospective phantomless BMD assessment of the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae from clinically indicated DECT examinations is feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5909343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59093432018-04-24 Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Booz, Christian Hofmann, Philipp C. Sedlmair, Martin Flohr, Thomas G. Schmidt, Bernhard D’Angelo, Tommaso Martin, Simon S. Lenga, Lukas Leithner, Doris Vogl, Thomas J. Wichmann, Julian L. Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: Current techniques for evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) commonly require phantom calibration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel algorithm for phantomless in vivo dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based assessment of BMD of the lumbar spine in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). METHODS: Data from clinically indicated DECT and DEXA examinations within two months comprising the lumbar spine of 47 patients were retrospectively evaluated. By using a novel automated dedicated post-processing algorithm for DECT, the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae L1–L4 was selected and analysed. Linear correlation was analysed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient for the comparison of the results from DECT and DEXA. RESULTS: A total of 186 lumbar vertebrae in 47 patients (mean age, 58 years; age range, 24–85 years) were analysed, 24 men (mean age, 55 years; age range, 24–85 years) and 23 women (mean age, 59 years; age range, 31–80 years). Mean BMD of L1–L4 determined with DEXA was 0.985 g/cm(2) and 20/47 patients (42.6%) showed an osteoporotic BMD (T score lower than – 2.5) of at least two vertebrae. Average DECT-based BMD of L1–L4 was 86.8 mg/cm(3). Regression analysis demonstrated a lack of correlation between DECT- and DEXA-based BMD values with a Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient r = 0.4205. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated post-processing of DECT data using a novel algorithm for retrospective phantomless BMD assessment of the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae from clinically indicated DECT examinations is feasible. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5909343/ /pubmed/29708178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0017-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Booz, Christian Hofmann, Philipp C. Sedlmair, Martin Flohr, Thomas G. Schmidt, Bernhard D’Angelo, Tommaso Martin, Simon S. Lenga, Lukas Leithner, Doris Vogl, Thomas J. Wichmann, Julian L. Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
title | Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
title_full | Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
title_short | Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry |
title_sort | evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy ct post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0017-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boozchristian evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry AT hofmannphilippc evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry AT sedlmairmartin evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry AT flohrthomasg evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry AT schmidtbernhard evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry AT dangelotommaso evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry AT martinsimons evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry AT lengalukas evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry AT leithnerdoris evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry AT voglthomasj evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry AT wichmannjulianl evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry |