Cargando…

Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

BACKGROUND: Current techniques for evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) commonly require phantom calibration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel algorithm for phantomless in vivo dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based assessment of BMD of the lumbar spine in comparison with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Booz, Christian, Hofmann, Philipp C., Sedlmair, Martin, Flohr, Thomas G., Schmidt, Bernhard, D’Angelo, Tommaso, Martin, Simon S., Lenga, Lukas, Leithner, Doris, Vogl, Thomas J., Wichmann, Julian L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0017-2
_version_ 1783315883843649536
author Booz, Christian
Hofmann, Philipp C.
Sedlmair, Martin
Flohr, Thomas G.
Schmidt, Bernhard
D’Angelo, Tommaso
Martin, Simon S.
Lenga, Lukas
Leithner, Doris
Vogl, Thomas J.
Wichmann, Julian L.
author_facet Booz, Christian
Hofmann, Philipp C.
Sedlmair, Martin
Flohr, Thomas G.
Schmidt, Bernhard
D’Angelo, Tommaso
Martin, Simon S.
Lenga, Lukas
Leithner, Doris
Vogl, Thomas J.
Wichmann, Julian L.
author_sort Booz, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current techniques for evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) commonly require phantom calibration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel algorithm for phantomless in vivo dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based assessment of BMD of the lumbar spine in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). METHODS: Data from clinically indicated DECT and DEXA examinations within two months comprising the lumbar spine of 47 patients were retrospectively evaluated. By using a novel automated dedicated post-processing algorithm for DECT, the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae L1–L4 was selected and analysed. Linear correlation was analysed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient for the comparison of the results from DECT and DEXA. RESULTS: A total of 186 lumbar vertebrae in 47 patients (mean age, 58 years; age range, 24–85 years) were analysed, 24 men (mean age, 55 years; age range, 24–85 years) and 23 women (mean age, 59 years; age range, 31–80 years). Mean BMD of L1–L4 determined with DEXA was 0.985 g/cm(2) and 20/47 patients (42.6%) showed an osteoporotic BMD (T score lower than – 2.5) of at least two vertebrae. Average DECT-based BMD of L1–L4 was 86.8 mg/cm(3). Regression analysis demonstrated a lack of correlation between DECT- and DEXA-based BMD values with a Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient r = 0.4205. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated post-processing of DECT data using a novel algorithm for retrospective phantomless BMD assessment of the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae from clinically indicated DECT examinations is feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5909343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59093432018-04-24 Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Booz, Christian Hofmann, Philipp C. Sedlmair, Martin Flohr, Thomas G. Schmidt, Bernhard D’Angelo, Tommaso Martin, Simon S. Lenga, Lukas Leithner, Doris Vogl, Thomas J. Wichmann, Julian L. Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: Current techniques for evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) commonly require phantom calibration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel algorithm for phantomless in vivo dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based assessment of BMD of the lumbar spine in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). METHODS: Data from clinically indicated DECT and DEXA examinations within two months comprising the lumbar spine of 47 patients were retrospectively evaluated. By using a novel automated dedicated post-processing algorithm for DECT, the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae L1–L4 was selected and analysed. Linear correlation was analysed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient for the comparison of the results from DECT and DEXA. RESULTS: A total of 186 lumbar vertebrae in 47 patients (mean age, 58 years; age range, 24–85 years) were analysed, 24 men (mean age, 55 years; age range, 24–85 years) and 23 women (mean age, 59 years; age range, 31–80 years). Mean BMD of L1–L4 determined with DEXA was 0.985 g/cm(2) and 20/47 patients (42.6%) showed an osteoporotic BMD (T score lower than – 2.5) of at least two vertebrae. Average DECT-based BMD of L1–L4 was 86.8 mg/cm(3). Regression analysis demonstrated a lack of correlation between DECT- and DEXA-based BMD values with a Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient r = 0.4205. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated post-processing of DECT data using a novel algorithm for retrospective phantomless BMD assessment of the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae from clinically indicated DECT examinations is feasible. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5909343/ /pubmed/29708178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0017-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Booz, Christian
Hofmann, Philipp C.
Sedlmair, Martin
Flohr, Thomas G.
Schmidt, Bernhard
D’Angelo, Tommaso
Martin, Simon S.
Lenga, Lukas
Leithner, Doris
Vogl, Thomas J.
Wichmann, Julian L.
Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_full Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_fullStr Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_short Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_sort evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy ct post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0017-2
work_keys_str_mv AT boozchristian evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT hofmannphilippc evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT sedlmairmartin evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT flohrthomasg evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT schmidtbernhard evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT dangelotommaso evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT martinsimons evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT lengalukas evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT leithnerdoris evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT voglthomasj evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT wichmannjulianl evaluationofbonemineraldensityofthelumbarspineusinganovelphantomlessdualenergyctpostprocessingalgorithmincomparisonwithdualenergyxrayabsorptiometry