Cargando…

Multimodal ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: a prospective study of clinical feasibility

BACKGROUND: To describe the clinical set-up and evaluate the feasibility of multimodal ultrasound tomography (MUT) for breast imaging. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients referred for breast imaging and 24 healthy volunteers underwent MUT. In the 32 patients, the examination discomfort was comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forte, S., Dellas, S., Stieltjes, B., Bongartz, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0029-y
_version_ 1783315887334359040
author Forte, S.
Dellas, S.
Stieltjes, B.
Bongartz, B.
author_facet Forte, S.
Dellas, S.
Stieltjes, B.
Bongartz, B.
author_sort Forte, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To describe the clinical set-up and evaluate the feasibility of multimodal ultrasound tomography (MUT) for breast imaging. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients referred for breast imaging and 24 healthy volunteers underwent MUT. In the 32 patients, the examination discomfort was compared to that of mammography (n = 31), handheld ultrasound (HUS) (n = 27) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n = 4) on a scale from 1 (lowest discomfort) to 10 (highest discomfort). MUT investigation time was recorded. Findings automatically detected by MUT were correlated with conventional imaging and biopsy results. RESULTS: Breast MUT was well tolerated by all 56 participants; 55 bilateral exams were uneventful. During one exam, the digitalisation card failed and the exam was successfully repeated within three days. Mean examination discomfort was 1.6 (range = 1–5) for MUT, 1.5 (range = 1–5) for HUS, 5.3 (range = 3–7) for MRI, and 6.3 (range = 1–10) for mammography. MUT examination time was 38 ± 6 min (mean ± standard deviation). In the patients referred for breast imaging, MUT detected four lesions and indicated malignancy in three of these cases. These findings were confirmed by additional imaging and biopsy. CONCLUSION: MUT is feasible in a clinical context considering examination time and patient acceptance. These interesting initial diagnostic findings warrant further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5909358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59093582018-04-24 Multimodal ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: a prospective study of clinical feasibility Forte, S. Dellas, S. Stieltjes, B. Bongartz, B. Eur Radiol Exp Technical Note BACKGROUND: To describe the clinical set-up and evaluate the feasibility of multimodal ultrasound tomography (MUT) for breast imaging. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients referred for breast imaging and 24 healthy volunteers underwent MUT. In the 32 patients, the examination discomfort was compared to that of mammography (n = 31), handheld ultrasound (HUS) (n = 27) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n = 4) on a scale from 1 (lowest discomfort) to 10 (highest discomfort). MUT investigation time was recorded. Findings automatically detected by MUT were correlated with conventional imaging and biopsy results. RESULTS: Breast MUT was well tolerated by all 56 participants; 55 bilateral exams were uneventful. During one exam, the digitalisation card failed and the exam was successfully repeated within three days. Mean examination discomfort was 1.6 (range = 1–5) for MUT, 1.5 (range = 1–5) for HUS, 5.3 (range = 3–7) for MRI, and 6.3 (range = 1–10) for mammography. MUT examination time was 38 ± 6 min (mean ± standard deviation). In the patients referred for breast imaging, MUT detected four lesions and indicated malignancy in three of these cases. These findings were confirmed by additional imaging and biopsy. CONCLUSION: MUT is feasible in a clinical context considering examination time and patient acceptance. These interesting initial diagnostic findings warrant further studies. Springer International Publishing 2017-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5909358/ /pubmed/29708167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0029-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Forte, S.
Dellas, S.
Stieltjes, B.
Bongartz, B.
Multimodal ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: a prospective study of clinical feasibility
title Multimodal ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: a prospective study of clinical feasibility
title_full Multimodal ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: a prospective study of clinical feasibility
title_fullStr Multimodal ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: a prospective study of clinical feasibility
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: a prospective study of clinical feasibility
title_short Multimodal ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: a prospective study of clinical feasibility
title_sort multimodal ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: a prospective study of clinical feasibility
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0029-y
work_keys_str_mv AT fortes multimodalultrasoundtomographyforbreastimagingaprospectivestudyofclinicalfeasibility
AT dellass multimodalultrasoundtomographyforbreastimagingaprospectivestudyofclinicalfeasibility
AT stieltjesb multimodalultrasoundtomographyforbreastimagingaprospectivestudyofclinicalfeasibility
AT bongartzb multimodalultrasoundtomographyforbreastimagingaprospectivestudyofclinicalfeasibility