Cargando…

Our experiences and suggestions with PEEK marker use in prostate cancer radiotherapy

Polyether ether ketone (PEEK), a material commonly used in industry, has recently been introduced in medicine. The use of PEEK in place of gold in gold marker implantation for prostate radiotherapy has been suggested to be advantageous because it is associated with a lower level of artefacts. In thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sen, Cenk Ahmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29692664
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2018.74394
_version_ 1783315947599167488
author Sen, Cenk Ahmet
author_facet Sen, Cenk Ahmet
author_sort Sen, Cenk Ahmet
collection PubMed
description Polyether ether ketone (PEEK), a material commonly used in industry, has recently been introduced in medicine. The use of PEEK in place of gold in gold marker implantation for prostate radiotherapy has been suggested to be advantageous because it is associated with a lower level of artefacts. In this study, we present a disadvantage of this newly introduced method, which has not yet been defined in the literature, and offer a solution for this problem to shed light on this issue, which has not yet been completely understood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5909730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59097302018-04-24 Our experiences and suggestions with PEEK marker use in prostate cancer radiotherapy Sen, Cenk Ahmet Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Letter to the Editor Polyether ether ketone (PEEK), a material commonly used in industry, has recently been introduced in medicine. The use of PEEK in place of gold in gold marker implantation for prostate radiotherapy has been suggested to be advantageous because it is associated with a lower level of artefacts. In this study, we present a disadvantage of this newly introduced method, which has not yet been defined in the literature, and offer a solution for this problem to shed light on this issue, which has not yet been completely understood. Termedia Publishing House 2018-04-03 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5909730/ /pubmed/29692664 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2018.74394 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Sen, Cenk Ahmet
Our experiences and suggestions with PEEK marker use in prostate cancer radiotherapy
title Our experiences and suggestions with PEEK marker use in prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_full Our experiences and suggestions with PEEK marker use in prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_fullStr Our experiences and suggestions with PEEK marker use in prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Our experiences and suggestions with PEEK marker use in prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_short Our experiences and suggestions with PEEK marker use in prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_sort our experiences and suggestions with peek marker use in prostate cancer radiotherapy
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29692664
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2018.74394
work_keys_str_mv AT sencenkahmet ourexperiencesandsuggestionswithpeekmarkeruseinprostatecancerradiotherapy