Cargando…
Significant association of BDNF rs6265 G>A polymorphism with susceptibility to epilepsy: a meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Previously published articles have suggested that BDNF rs6265 G>A polymorphism is a potential risk factor for epilepsy. However, the results were not consistent. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the association between BDNF rs6265 G>A polymorphism and epilepsy ris...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713173 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S154927 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Previously published articles have suggested that BDNF rs6265 G>A polymorphism is a potential risk factor for epilepsy. However, the results were not consistent. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the association between BDNF rs6265 G>A polymorphism and epilepsy risk. Four online databases were searched, and related studies were reviewed from their inception up to June 20, 2017. ORs and corresponding 95% CIs were used to calculate the associations of each genetic model. Overall, 10 case–control publications involving 9,512 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between BDNF rs6265 G>A polymorphism and epilepsy (A vs G: OR=0.88, 95% CI=0.83–0.94, P<0.01, I(2)=0%; GA vs GG: OR=0.88, 95% CI=0.79–0.97, P=0.01, I(2)=0%; AA vs GG: OR=0.79, 95% CI=0.70–0.90, P<0.01, I(2)=0%; GA+AA vs GG: OR=0.85, 95% CI=0.77–0.94, P<0.01, I(2)=0%; AA vs GG+GA: OR=0.85, 95% CI=0.76–0.95, P=0.01, I(2)=0%). Subgroup analysis also showed similar results in an Asian population. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis indicated that BDNF rs6265 G>A polymorphism might be involved in epilepsy susceptibility, especially in the Asian population. |
---|