Cargando…

Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage is a major surgical complication following esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. Specific risk factors such as celiac trunk (TC) stenosis and high calcification score of the aorta have been identified, but no data are available on their relative prognostic values. This retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, De-Hua, Brinkmann, Sebastian, Smith, Lucy, Becker, Ingrid, Schroeder, Wolfgang, Hoelscher, Arnulf H, Haneder, Stefan, Maintz, David, Spiro, Judith Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713180
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S157352
_version_ 1783315958362800128
author Chang, De-Hua
Brinkmann, Sebastian
Smith, Lucy
Becker, Ingrid
Schroeder, Wolfgang
Hoelscher, Arnulf H
Haneder, Stefan
Maintz, David
Spiro, Judith Eva
author_facet Chang, De-Hua
Brinkmann, Sebastian
Smith, Lucy
Becker, Ingrid
Schroeder, Wolfgang
Hoelscher, Arnulf H
Haneder, Stefan
Maintz, David
Spiro, Judith Eva
author_sort Chang, De-Hua
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage is a major surgical complication following esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. Specific risk factors such as celiac trunk (TC) stenosis and high calcification score of the aorta have been identified, but no data are available on their relative prognostic values. This retrospective study aimed to compare and evaluate calcification score versus stenosis quantification with regards to prognostic impact on anastomotic leakage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of 164 consecutive patients with primary esophageal cancer were evaluated by two radiologists to apply a calcification score (0–3 scale) assessing the aorta, the celiac axis and the right and left postceliac arteries. Concurrently, the presence and degree of stenosis of TC and superior mesenteric artery were recorded for stenosis quantification. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage was noted in 14/164 patients and 12/14 showed stenosis of TC (n=11). The presence of TC stenosis was found to have a significant impact on anastomotic healing (p=0.004). The odds ratio for the prediction of anastomotic leakage by the degree of stenosis was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02–1.07). Ten of 14 patients had aortic calcification scores of 1 or 2, but calcification scores of the aorta, the celiac axis and the right and left postceliac arteries did not correlate with the corresponding TC stenosis values and showed no influence on patient outcome as defined by the occurrence of anastomotic insufficiency (p=0.565, 0.855, 0.518 and 1.000, respectively). Inter-reader reliability of computed tomography analysis and absolute agreement on calcium scoring was mostly over 90%. No significant differences in preoperative comorbidities and patient characteristics were found between those with and without anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION: Measurement of TC stenosis in preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans proved to be more reliable than calcification scores in predicting anastomotic leakage and should, therefore, be used in the risk assessment of patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastric pull-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5909785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59097852018-04-30 Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up Chang, De-Hua Brinkmann, Sebastian Smith, Lucy Becker, Ingrid Schroeder, Wolfgang Hoelscher, Arnulf H Haneder, Stefan Maintz, David Spiro, Judith Eva Ther Clin Risk Manag Original Research PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage is a major surgical complication following esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. Specific risk factors such as celiac trunk (TC) stenosis and high calcification score of the aorta have been identified, but no data are available on their relative prognostic values. This retrospective study aimed to compare and evaluate calcification score versus stenosis quantification with regards to prognostic impact on anastomotic leakage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of 164 consecutive patients with primary esophageal cancer were evaluated by two radiologists to apply a calcification score (0–3 scale) assessing the aorta, the celiac axis and the right and left postceliac arteries. Concurrently, the presence and degree of stenosis of TC and superior mesenteric artery were recorded for stenosis quantification. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage was noted in 14/164 patients and 12/14 showed stenosis of TC (n=11). The presence of TC stenosis was found to have a significant impact on anastomotic healing (p=0.004). The odds ratio for the prediction of anastomotic leakage by the degree of stenosis was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02–1.07). Ten of 14 patients had aortic calcification scores of 1 or 2, but calcification scores of the aorta, the celiac axis and the right and left postceliac arteries did not correlate with the corresponding TC stenosis values and showed no influence on patient outcome as defined by the occurrence of anastomotic insufficiency (p=0.565, 0.855, 0.518 and 1.000, respectively). Inter-reader reliability of computed tomography analysis and absolute agreement on calcium scoring was mostly over 90%. No significant differences in preoperative comorbidities and patient characteristics were found between those with and without anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION: Measurement of TC stenosis in preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans proved to be more reliable than calcification scores in predicting anastomotic leakage and should, therefore, be used in the risk assessment of patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. Dove Medical Press 2018-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5909785/ /pubmed/29713180 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S157352 Text en © 2018 Chang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chang, De-Hua
Brinkmann, Sebastian
Smith, Lucy
Becker, Ingrid
Schroeder, Wolfgang
Hoelscher, Arnulf H
Haneder, Stefan
Maintz, David
Spiro, Judith Eva
Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title_full Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title_fullStr Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title_full_unstemmed Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title_short Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title_sort calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two ct-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5909785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713180
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S157352
work_keys_str_mv AT changdehua calcificationscoreversusarterialstenosisgradingcomparisonoftwoctbasedmethodsforriskassessmentofanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT brinkmannsebastian calcificationscoreversusarterialstenosisgradingcomparisonoftwoctbasedmethodsforriskassessmentofanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT smithlucy calcificationscoreversusarterialstenosisgradingcomparisonoftwoctbasedmethodsforriskassessmentofanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT beckeringrid calcificationscoreversusarterialstenosisgradingcomparisonoftwoctbasedmethodsforriskassessmentofanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT schroederwolfgang calcificationscoreversusarterialstenosisgradingcomparisonoftwoctbasedmethodsforriskassessmentofanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT hoelscherarnulfh calcificationscoreversusarterialstenosisgradingcomparisonoftwoctbasedmethodsforriskassessmentofanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT hanederstefan calcificationscoreversusarterialstenosisgradingcomparisonoftwoctbasedmethodsforriskassessmentofanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT maintzdavid calcificationscoreversusarterialstenosisgradingcomparisonoftwoctbasedmethodsforriskassessmentofanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT spirojuditheva calcificationscoreversusarterialstenosisgradingcomparisonoftwoctbasedmethodsforriskassessmentofanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup