Cargando…

Safety and Feasibility of the OmniPod Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adult, Adolescent, and Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Personalized Model Predictive Control Algorithm

Background: The safety and feasibility of the OmniPod personalized model predictive control (MPC) algorithm in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes were investigated. Methods: This multicenter, observational trial included a 1-week outpatient sensor-augmented pump open-loop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buckingham, Bruce A., Forlenza, Gregory P., Pinsker, Jordan E., Christiansen, Mark P., Wadwa, R. Paul, Schneider, Jennifer, Peyser, Thomas A., Dassau, Eyal, Lee, Joon Bok, O'Connor, Jason, Layne, Jennifer E., Ly, Trang T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29431513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0346
_version_ 1783315986176278528
author Buckingham, Bruce A.
Forlenza, Gregory P.
Pinsker, Jordan E.
Christiansen, Mark P.
Wadwa, R. Paul
Schneider, Jennifer
Peyser, Thomas A.
Dassau, Eyal
Lee, Joon Bok
O'Connor, Jason
Layne, Jennifer E.
Ly, Trang T.
author_facet Buckingham, Bruce A.
Forlenza, Gregory P.
Pinsker, Jordan E.
Christiansen, Mark P.
Wadwa, R. Paul
Schneider, Jennifer
Peyser, Thomas A.
Dassau, Eyal
Lee, Joon Bok
O'Connor, Jason
Layne, Jennifer E.
Ly, Trang T.
author_sort Buckingham, Bruce A.
collection PubMed
description Background: The safety and feasibility of the OmniPod personalized model predictive control (MPC) algorithm in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes were investigated. Methods: This multicenter, observational trial included a 1-week outpatient sensor-augmented pump open-loop phase and a 36-h inpatient hybrid closed-loop (HCL) phase with announced meals ranging from 30 to 90 g of carbohydrates and limited physical activity. Patients aged 6–65 years with HbA1c between 6.0% and 10.0% were eligible. The investigational system included a modified version of OmniPod, the Dexcom G4 505 Share(®) AP System, and the personalized MPC algorithm running on a tablet computer. Primary endpoints included sensor glucose percentage of time in hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL and hyperglycemia >250 mg/dL. Additional glycemic targets were assessed. Results: The percentage of time <70 mg/dL during the 36-h HCL phase was mean (standard deviation): 0.7 (1.7) in adults receiving 80% meal bolus (n = 24), and 0.7 (1.2) in adults (n = 10), 2.0 (2.4) in adolescents (n = 12), and 2.0 (2.6) in pediatrics (n = 12) receiving 100% meal bolus. The overall hypoglycemia rate was 0.49 events/24 h. The percentage of time >250 mg/dL was 8.0 (7.5), 3.6 (3.7), 4.9 (6.3), and 6.7 (5.6) in the study groups, respectively. Percentage of time in the target range of 70–180 mg/dL was 69.5 (14.4), 73.0 (15.0), 72.6 (15.5), and 70.1 (12.3), respectively. Conclusions: The OmniPod personalized MPC algorithm performed well and was safe during day and night use in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Longer term studies will assess the safety and performance of the algorithm under free living conditions with extended use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5910038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59100382018-04-23 Safety and Feasibility of the OmniPod Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adult, Adolescent, and Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Personalized Model Predictive Control Algorithm Buckingham, Bruce A. Forlenza, Gregory P. Pinsker, Jordan E. Christiansen, Mark P. Wadwa, R. Paul Schneider, Jennifer Peyser, Thomas A. Dassau, Eyal Lee, Joon Bok O'Connor, Jason Layne, Jennifer E. Ly, Trang T. Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: The safety and feasibility of the OmniPod personalized model predictive control (MPC) algorithm in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes were investigated. Methods: This multicenter, observational trial included a 1-week outpatient sensor-augmented pump open-loop phase and a 36-h inpatient hybrid closed-loop (HCL) phase with announced meals ranging from 30 to 90 g of carbohydrates and limited physical activity. Patients aged 6–65 years with HbA1c between 6.0% and 10.0% were eligible. The investigational system included a modified version of OmniPod, the Dexcom G4 505 Share(®) AP System, and the personalized MPC algorithm running on a tablet computer. Primary endpoints included sensor glucose percentage of time in hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL and hyperglycemia >250 mg/dL. Additional glycemic targets were assessed. Results: The percentage of time <70 mg/dL during the 36-h HCL phase was mean (standard deviation): 0.7 (1.7) in adults receiving 80% meal bolus (n = 24), and 0.7 (1.2) in adults (n = 10), 2.0 (2.4) in adolescents (n = 12), and 2.0 (2.6) in pediatrics (n = 12) receiving 100% meal bolus. The overall hypoglycemia rate was 0.49 events/24 h. The percentage of time >250 mg/dL was 8.0 (7.5), 3.6 (3.7), 4.9 (6.3), and 6.7 (5.6) in the study groups, respectively. Percentage of time in the target range of 70–180 mg/dL was 69.5 (14.4), 73.0 (15.0), 72.6 (15.5), and 70.1 (12.3), respectively. Conclusions: The OmniPod personalized MPC algorithm performed well and was safe during day and night use in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Longer term studies will assess the safety and performance of the algorithm under free living conditions with extended use. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018-04-01 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5910038/ /pubmed/29431513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0346 Text en © Bruce A. Buckingham, et al., 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Buckingham, Bruce A.
Forlenza, Gregory P.
Pinsker, Jordan E.
Christiansen, Mark P.
Wadwa, R. Paul
Schneider, Jennifer
Peyser, Thomas A.
Dassau, Eyal
Lee, Joon Bok
O'Connor, Jason
Layne, Jennifer E.
Ly, Trang T.
Safety and Feasibility of the OmniPod Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adult, Adolescent, and Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Personalized Model Predictive Control Algorithm
title Safety and Feasibility of the OmniPod Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adult, Adolescent, and Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Personalized Model Predictive Control Algorithm
title_full Safety and Feasibility of the OmniPod Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adult, Adolescent, and Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Personalized Model Predictive Control Algorithm
title_fullStr Safety and Feasibility of the OmniPod Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adult, Adolescent, and Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Personalized Model Predictive Control Algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Feasibility of the OmniPod Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adult, Adolescent, and Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Personalized Model Predictive Control Algorithm
title_short Safety and Feasibility of the OmniPod Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adult, Adolescent, and Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Personalized Model Predictive Control Algorithm
title_sort safety and feasibility of the omnipod hybrid closed-loop system in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using a personalized model predictive control algorithm
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29431513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0346
work_keys_str_mv AT buckinghambrucea safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT forlenzagregoryp safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT pinskerjordane safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT christiansenmarkp safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT wadwarpaul safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT schneiderjennifer safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT peyserthomasa safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT dassaueyal safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT leejoonbok safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT oconnorjason safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT laynejennifere safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm
AT lytrangt safetyandfeasibilityoftheomnipodhybridclosedloopsysteminadultadolescentandpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesusingapersonalizedmodelpredictivecontrolalgorithm